利用药理平衡模型评估 GluN2A 选择性拮抗剂对异位 NMDA 受体的调节作用。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
James S Lotti, Jaron Jones, Jill C Farnsworth, Feng Yi, Fabao Zhao, Frank S Menniti, Robert A Volkmann, Rasmus P Clausen, Kasper B Hansen
{"title":"利用药理平衡模型评估 GluN2A 选择性拮抗剂对异位 NMDA 受体的调节作用。","authors":"James S Lotti, Jaron Jones, Jill C Farnsworth, Feng Yi, Fabao Zhao, Frank S Menniti, Robert A Volkmann, Rasmus P Clausen, Kasper B Hansen","doi":"10.1124/molpharm.124.000975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>NMDA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors are critically involved in excitatory neurotransmission and their dysfunction is implicated in many brain disorders. Allosteric modulators with selectivity for specific NMDA receptor subtypes are therefore attractive as therapeutic agents, and sustained drug discovery efforts have resulted in a wide range of new allosteric modulators. However, evaluation of allosteric NMDA receptor modulators is limited by the lack of operational ligand-receptor models to describe modulator binding dissociation constants (K<sub>B</sub>) and effects on agonist binding affinity (α) and efficacy (β). Here, we describe a pharmacological equilibrium model that encapsulates activation and modulation of NMDA receptors, and we apply this model to afford deeper understanding of GluN2A-selective negative allosteric modulators (NAMs), TCN-201, MPX-004, and MPX-007. We exploit slow NAM unbinding to examine receptors at hemi-equilibrium when fully occupied by agonists and modulators to demonstrate that TCN-201 display weaker binding and negative modulation of glycine binding affinity (K<sub>B</sub> = 42 nM, α = 0.0032) compared to MPX-004 (K<sub>B</sub> = 9.3 nM, α = 0.0018) and MPX-007 (K<sub>B</sub> = 1.1 nM, α = 0.00053). MPX-004 increases agonist efficacy (β = 1.19), whereas TCN-201 (β = 0.76) and MPX-007 (β = 0.82) reduce agonist efficacy. These values describing allosteric modulation of diheteromeric GluN1/2A receptors with two modulator binding sites are unchanged in triheteromeric GluN1/2A/2B receptors with a single binding site. This evaluation of NMDA receptor modulation reveals differences between ligand analogs that shape their utility as pharmacological tool compounds and facilitates the design of new modulators with therapeutic potential. <b>Significance Statement</b> Detailed understanding of allosteric NMDA receptor modulation requires pharmacological methods to quantify modulator binding affinity and the strengths of modulation of agonist binding and efficacy. We describe a generic ligand-receptor model for allosteric NMDA receptor modulation and use this model for the characterization of GluN2A-selective NAMs. The model enables quantitative evaluation of a broad range of NMDA receptor modulators and provides opportunities to optimize these modulators by embellishing the interpretation of their structure-activity relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":18767,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of allosteric NMDA receptor modulation by GluN2A-selective antagonists using pharmacological equilibrium modeling.\",\"authors\":\"James S Lotti, Jaron Jones, Jill C Farnsworth, Feng Yi, Fabao Zhao, Frank S Menniti, Robert A Volkmann, Rasmus P Clausen, Kasper B Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1124/molpharm.124.000975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>NMDA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors are critically involved in excitatory neurotransmission and their dysfunction is implicated in many brain disorders. Allosteric modulators with selectivity for specific NMDA receptor subtypes are therefore attractive as therapeutic agents, and sustained drug discovery efforts have resulted in a wide range of new allosteric modulators. However, evaluation of allosteric NMDA receptor modulators is limited by the lack of operational ligand-receptor models to describe modulator binding dissociation constants (K<sub>B</sub>) and effects on agonist binding affinity (α) and efficacy (β). Here, we describe a pharmacological equilibrium model that encapsulates activation and modulation of NMDA receptors, and we apply this model to afford deeper understanding of GluN2A-selective negative allosteric modulators (NAMs), TCN-201, MPX-004, and MPX-007. We exploit slow NAM unbinding to examine receptors at hemi-equilibrium when fully occupied by agonists and modulators to demonstrate that TCN-201 display weaker binding and negative modulation of glycine binding affinity (K<sub>B</sub> = 42 nM, α = 0.0032) compared to MPX-004 (K<sub>B</sub> = 9.3 nM, α = 0.0018) and MPX-007 (K<sub>B</sub> = 1.1 nM, α = 0.00053). MPX-004 increases agonist efficacy (β = 1.19), whereas TCN-201 (β = 0.76) and MPX-007 (β = 0.82) reduce agonist efficacy. These values describing allosteric modulation of diheteromeric GluN1/2A receptors with two modulator binding sites are unchanged in triheteromeric GluN1/2A/2B receptors with a single binding site. This evaluation of NMDA receptor modulation reveals differences between ligand analogs that shape their utility as pharmacological tool compounds and facilitates the design of new modulators with therapeutic potential. <b>Significance Statement</b> Detailed understanding of allosteric NMDA receptor modulation requires pharmacological methods to quantify modulator binding affinity and the strengths of modulation of agonist binding and efficacy. We describe a generic ligand-receptor model for allosteric NMDA receptor modulation and use this model for the characterization of GluN2A-selective NAMs. The model enables quantitative evaluation of a broad range of NMDA receptor modulators and provides opportunities to optimize these modulators by embellishing the interpretation of their structure-activity relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1124/molpharm.124.000975\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1124/molpharm.124.000975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

NMDA 型离子型谷氨酸受体在兴奋性神经传递中起着关键作用,许多脑部疾病都与它们的功能障碍有关。因此,对特定 NMDA 受体亚型具有选择性的异构调节剂作为治疗药物很有吸引力。然而,由于缺乏可操作的配体-受体模型来描述调节剂的结合解离常数(KB)以及对激动剂结合亲和力(α)和药效(β)的影响,对异位NMDA受体调节剂的评估受到了限制。在这里,我们描述了一个囊括 NMDA 受体的激活和调节的药理学平衡模型,并将该模型用于加深对 GluN2A 选择性负异位调节剂(NAM)TCN-201、MPX-004 和 MPX-007 的理解。我们利用缓慢的 NAM 解除结合来研究完全被激动剂和调节剂占据时处于半平衡状态的受体,结果表明,与 MPX-004 (KB = 9.3 nM,α = 0.0018)和 MPX-007 (KB = 1.1 nM,α = 0.00053)相比,TCN-201 显示出较弱的结合力和对甘氨酸结合亲和力的负调节(KB = 42 nM,α = 0.0032)。MPX-004 增加了激动剂功效(β = 1.19),而 TCN-201 (β = 0.76)和 MPX-007 (β = 0.82)降低了激动剂功效。这些数值描述了具有两个调节剂结合位点的二异构体 GluN1/2A 受体的异构调节作用,在具有一个结合位点的三异构体 GluN1/2A/2B 受体中没有变化。对 NMDA 受体调制的这一评估揭示了配体类似物之间的差异,这些差异决定了它们作为药理学工具化合物的效用,并有助于设计具有治疗潜力的新调制剂。意义声明 要详细了解异位 NMDA 受体调节,需要用药理学方法来量化调节剂的结合亲和力以及对激动剂结合和药效的调节强度。我们描述了异位 NMDA 受体调节的配体-受体通用模型,并使用该模型表征 GluN2A 选择性 NAMs。该模型可对多种 NMDA 受体调节剂进行定量评估,并通过对其结构-活性关系的解释为优化这些调节剂提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of allosteric NMDA receptor modulation by GluN2A-selective antagonists using pharmacological equilibrium modeling.

NMDA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors are critically involved in excitatory neurotransmission and their dysfunction is implicated in many brain disorders. Allosteric modulators with selectivity for specific NMDA receptor subtypes are therefore attractive as therapeutic agents, and sustained drug discovery efforts have resulted in a wide range of new allosteric modulators. However, evaluation of allosteric NMDA receptor modulators is limited by the lack of operational ligand-receptor models to describe modulator binding dissociation constants (KB) and effects on agonist binding affinity (α) and efficacy (β). Here, we describe a pharmacological equilibrium model that encapsulates activation and modulation of NMDA receptors, and we apply this model to afford deeper understanding of GluN2A-selective negative allosteric modulators (NAMs), TCN-201, MPX-004, and MPX-007. We exploit slow NAM unbinding to examine receptors at hemi-equilibrium when fully occupied by agonists and modulators to demonstrate that TCN-201 display weaker binding and negative modulation of glycine binding affinity (KB = 42 nM, α = 0.0032) compared to MPX-004 (KB = 9.3 nM, α = 0.0018) and MPX-007 (KB = 1.1 nM, α = 0.00053). MPX-004 increases agonist efficacy (β = 1.19), whereas TCN-201 (β = 0.76) and MPX-007 (β = 0.82) reduce agonist efficacy. These values describing allosteric modulation of diheteromeric GluN1/2A receptors with two modulator binding sites are unchanged in triheteromeric GluN1/2A/2B receptors with a single binding site. This evaluation of NMDA receptor modulation reveals differences between ligand analogs that shape their utility as pharmacological tool compounds and facilitates the design of new modulators with therapeutic potential. Significance Statement Detailed understanding of allosteric NMDA receptor modulation requires pharmacological methods to quantify modulator binding affinity and the strengths of modulation of agonist binding and efficacy. We describe a generic ligand-receptor model for allosteric NMDA receptor modulation and use this model for the characterization of GluN2A-selective NAMs. The model enables quantitative evaluation of a broad range of NMDA receptor modulators and provides opportunities to optimize these modulators by embellishing the interpretation of their structure-activity relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Pharmacology
Molecular Pharmacology 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Pharmacology publishes findings derived from the application of innovative structural biology, biochemistry, biophysics, physiology, genetics, and molecular biology to basic pharmacological problems that provide mechanistic insights that are broadly important for the fields of pharmacology and toxicology. Relevant topics include: Molecular Signaling / Mechanism of Drug Action Chemical Biology / Drug Discovery Structure of Drug-Receptor Complex Systems Analysis of Drug Action Drug Transport / Metabolism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信