扫描仪软件升级期间三维磁共振指纹识别的可重复性。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Andrew Dupuis, Yong Chen, Kelvin Chow, Mark A Griswold, Rasim Boyacioglu
{"title":"扫描仪软件升级期间三维磁共振指纹识别的可重复性。","authors":"Andrew Dupuis, Yong Chen, Kelvin Chow, Mark A Griswold, Rasim Boyacioglu","doi":"10.1007/s10334-024-01211-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to quantify the repeatability of a 3D Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) research protocol in the context of a scanner software upgrade. All of MRI assumes consistent hardware performance and raw data pre-processing on the acquisition side. Software upgrades can affect hardware specifications and reconstruction chain parameters. Understanding how vendor-provided software upgrades vary MRF-derived T1 and T2 values is crucial for its application in different settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eight healthy volunteers were imaged with an in-house developed 3D MRF pulse sequence using a 3T scanner before and after a software upgrade (VA31A to VA50A, MAGNETOM Vida, Siemens Healthineers). Online MRF reconstruction using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) timeseries compression and B1+ correction was performed. The study involved test-retest repeatability assessment and a comparison of pre- and post-upgrade data based on automatically extracted T1 and T2 values from MNI-152 Harvard-Oxford Subcortical Structural Atlas regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant mismatches were found directly after the upgrade. However, after an information exchange with the vendor, the 3D-MRF sequence showed consistent repeatability in both intra-version test-retest scenarios and cross-version comparisons: <math><mo>-</mo></math> 1.16 ± 3.18% variability in T1 and <math><mo>-</mo></math> 0.54 ± 4.84% in T2 for intra-version tests, and <math><mo>-</mo></math> 0.83 ± 3.68% (T1) and <math><mo>-</mo></math> 0.05 ± 5.81% (T2) variability for cross-version comparisons.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study shows the reliable performance of 3D MRF protocols across software upgrades is possible, but it also highlights the importance of detailed evaluation and vendor collaboration in ensuring consistency. These findings support the application of MRF in longitudinal studies and emphasize the need for systematic assessments following hardware or software modifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatability of 3D MR fingerprinting during scanner software upgrades.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Dupuis, Yong Chen, Kelvin Chow, Mark A Griswold, Rasim Boyacioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10334-024-01211-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to quantify the repeatability of a 3D Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) research protocol in the context of a scanner software upgrade. All of MRI assumes consistent hardware performance and raw data pre-processing on the acquisition side. Software upgrades can affect hardware specifications and reconstruction chain parameters. Understanding how vendor-provided software upgrades vary MRF-derived T1 and T2 values is crucial for its application in different settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eight healthy volunteers were imaged with an in-house developed 3D MRF pulse sequence using a 3T scanner before and after a software upgrade (VA31A to VA50A, MAGNETOM Vida, Siemens Healthineers). Online MRF reconstruction using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) timeseries compression and B1+ correction was performed. The study involved test-retest repeatability assessment and a comparison of pre- and post-upgrade data based on automatically extracted T1 and T2 values from MNI-152 Harvard-Oxford Subcortical Structural Atlas regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant mismatches were found directly after the upgrade. However, after an information exchange with the vendor, the 3D-MRF sequence showed consistent repeatability in both intra-version test-retest scenarios and cross-version comparisons: <math><mo>-</mo></math> 1.16 ± 3.18% variability in T1 and <math><mo>-</mo></math> 0.54 ± 4.84% in T2 for intra-version tests, and <math><mo>-</mo></math> 0.83 ± 3.68% (T1) and <math><mo>-</mo></math> 0.05 ± 5.81% (T2) variability for cross-version comparisons.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study shows the reliable performance of 3D MRF protocols across software upgrades is possible, but it also highlights the importance of detailed evaluation and vendor collaboration in ensuring consistency. These findings support the application of MRF in longitudinal studies and emphasize the need for systematic assessments following hardware or software modifications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01211-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01211-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在量化三维磁共振指纹(MRF)研究方案在扫描仪软件升级情况下的可重复性。所有磁共振成像都假定采集端的硬件性能和原始数据预处理保持一致。软件升级会影响硬件规格和重建链参数。了解供应商提供的软件升级如何改变 MRF 导出的 T1 和 T2 值对其在不同环境中的应用至关重要:在软件升级(VA31A 至 VA50A,MAGNETOM Vida,西门子医疗集团)前后,使用一台 3T 扫描仪对八名健康志愿者进行了内部开发的三维 MRF 脉冲序列成像。使用奇异值分解(SVD)时序压缩和 B1+ 校正进行了在线 MRF 重建。研究包括重复性测试评估以及基于从 MNI-152 哈佛-牛津皮质下结构图谱区域自动提取的 T1 和 T2 值的升级前后数据比较:结果:升级后直接发现了明显的不匹配。然而,在与供应商进行信息交流后,3D-MRF 序列在版本内测试-重测情况和跨版本比较中均显示出一致的重复性:- 版本内测试的 T1 变异性为 1.16 ± 3.18%,T2 变异性为 - 0.54 ± 4.84%;跨版本比较的变异性为 - 0.83 ± 3.68%(T1)和 - 0.05 ± 5.81%(T2):该研究表明,三维 MRF 协议在软件升级时的可靠性能是可能的,但它也强调了详细评估和供应商合作在确保一致性方面的重要性。这些研究结果支持在纵向研究中应用 MRF,并强调了在硬件或软件修改后进行系统评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeatability of 3D MR fingerprinting during scanner software upgrades.

Objective: This study aims to quantify the repeatability of a 3D Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) research protocol in the context of a scanner software upgrade. All of MRI assumes consistent hardware performance and raw data pre-processing on the acquisition side. Software upgrades can affect hardware specifications and reconstruction chain parameters. Understanding how vendor-provided software upgrades vary MRF-derived T1 and T2 values is crucial for its application in different settings.

Materials and methods: Eight healthy volunteers were imaged with an in-house developed 3D MRF pulse sequence using a 3T scanner before and after a software upgrade (VA31A to VA50A, MAGNETOM Vida, Siemens Healthineers). Online MRF reconstruction using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) timeseries compression and B1+ correction was performed. The study involved test-retest repeatability assessment and a comparison of pre- and post-upgrade data based on automatically extracted T1 and T2 values from MNI-152 Harvard-Oxford Subcortical Structural Atlas regions.

Results: Significant mismatches were found directly after the upgrade. However, after an information exchange with the vendor, the 3D-MRF sequence showed consistent repeatability in both intra-version test-retest scenarios and cross-version comparisons: - 1.16 ± 3.18% variability in T1 and - 0.54 ± 4.84% in T2 for intra-version tests, and - 0.83 ± 3.68% (T1) and - 0.05 ± 5.81% (T2) variability for cross-version comparisons.

Discussion: The study shows the reliable performance of 3D MRF protocols across software upgrades is possible, but it also highlights the importance of detailed evaluation and vendor collaboration in ensuring consistency. These findings support the application of MRF in longitudinal studies and emphasize the need for systematic assessments following hardware or software modifications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信