拖线疗法对非缺血性糖尿病足溃疡坏疽的临床效果。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Fang-Fang Wu, Jie Wang, Guo-Bin Liu
{"title":"拖线疗法对非缺血性糖尿病足溃疡坏疽的临床效果。","authors":"Fang-Fang Wu, Jie Wang, Guo-Bin Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11655-024-3912-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical effects of thread-dragging therapy on gangrene of non-ischemic diabetic foot ulcers (NIDFU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 136 patients with NIDFU were recruited from the Department of Peripheral Vascular Surgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between June 21, 2021 and February 1, 2023, and randomized into an intervention group and a control group, with 68 cases in each group. Both groups received basic treatment. The intervention group was treated with thread-dragging therapy, while the control group was treated with debridement combined with routine dressing changes after surgery. Both groups were treated continuously for 2 months. The amputation rates and changes in the ulcer area were compared between the groups. The inflammatory response index including peripheral white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophil percentage (NEUT%), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After treatment, the ulcer areas in the intervention group were significantly smaller than that of the control group (8.50±3.88 cm<sup>2</sup> vs. 10.11±4.61 cm<sup>2</sup>, P<0.05). The amputation rates of the two groups were not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 5.9%, P>0.05). Differences of WBCs count, CRP, and ESR before and after therapy in the intervention group were better than the control group (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in changes of NEUT%, PCT, and IL-6 between the two groups (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thread-dragging therapy may be effective in the treatment of NIDFU, with the additional advantages of less tissue damage after healing. (Registration No. ChiCTR2100047496).</p>","PeriodicalId":10005,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Effects of Thread-Dragging Therapy on Gangrene of Non-ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers.\",\"authors\":\"Fang-Fang Wu, Jie Wang, Guo-Bin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11655-024-3912-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical effects of thread-dragging therapy on gangrene of non-ischemic diabetic foot ulcers (NIDFU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 136 patients with NIDFU were recruited from the Department of Peripheral Vascular Surgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between June 21, 2021 and February 1, 2023, and randomized into an intervention group and a control group, with 68 cases in each group. Both groups received basic treatment. The intervention group was treated with thread-dragging therapy, while the control group was treated with debridement combined with routine dressing changes after surgery. Both groups were treated continuously for 2 months. The amputation rates and changes in the ulcer area were compared between the groups. The inflammatory response index including peripheral white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophil percentage (NEUT%), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After treatment, the ulcer areas in the intervention group were significantly smaller than that of the control group (8.50±3.88 cm<sup>2</sup> vs. 10.11±4.61 cm<sup>2</sup>, P<0.05). The amputation rates of the two groups were not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 5.9%, P>0.05). Differences of WBCs count, CRP, and ESR before and after therapy in the intervention group were better than the control group (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in changes of NEUT%, PCT, and IL-6 between the two groups (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thread-dragging therapy may be effective in the treatment of NIDFU, with the additional advantages of less tissue damage after healing. (Registration No. ChiCTR2100047496).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-024-3912-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-024-3912-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨拖线疗法对非缺血性糖尿病足溃疡坏疽的临床效果:研究拖线疗法对非缺血性糖尿病足溃疡(NIDFU)坏疽的临床疗效:方法:选取2021年6月21日至2023年2月1日期间上海中医药大学附属曙光医院周围血管外科收治的136例非缺血性糖尿病足溃疡患者,随机分为干预组和对照组,每组68例。两组均接受基础治疗。干预组采用拖线疗法,对照组采用清创疗法,术后常规换药。两组均持续治疗 2 个月。比较了两组的截肢率和溃疡面积的变化。比较两组的炎症反应指数,包括外周血白细胞(WBC)、中性粒细胞百分比(NEUT%)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、降钙素原(PCT)和白细胞介素6(IL-6):结果:治疗后,干预组的溃疡面积明显小于对照组(8.50±3.88 cm2 vs. 10.11±4.61 cm2,P0.05)。干预组治疗前后白细胞计数、CRP、血沉均优于对照组(P0.05):结论:拖线疗法可有效治疗 NIDFU,并具有愈合后组织损伤较小的优点。(注册号:ChiCTR2100047496)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Effects of Thread-Dragging Therapy on Gangrene of Non-ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of thread-dragging therapy on gangrene of non-ischemic diabetic foot ulcers (NIDFU).

Methods: A total of 136 patients with NIDFU were recruited from the Department of Peripheral Vascular Surgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between June 21, 2021 and February 1, 2023, and randomized into an intervention group and a control group, with 68 cases in each group. Both groups received basic treatment. The intervention group was treated with thread-dragging therapy, while the control group was treated with debridement combined with routine dressing changes after surgery. Both groups were treated continuously for 2 months. The amputation rates and changes in the ulcer area were compared between the groups. The inflammatory response index including peripheral white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophil percentage (NEUT%), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were compared between the two groups.

Results: After treatment, the ulcer areas in the intervention group were significantly smaller than that of the control group (8.50±3.88 cm2 vs. 10.11±4.61 cm2, P<0.05). The amputation rates of the two groups were not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 5.9%, P>0.05). Differences of WBCs count, CRP, and ESR before and after therapy in the intervention group were better than the control group (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in changes of NEUT%, PCT, and IL-6 between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Thread-dragging therapy may be effective in the treatment of NIDFU, with the additional advantages of less tissue damage after healing. (Registration No. ChiCTR2100047496).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
2413
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine seeks to promote international communication and exchange on integrative medicine as well as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and provide a rapid forum for the dissemination of scientific articles focusing on the latest developments and trends as well as experiences and achievements on integrative medicine or CAM in clinical practice, scientific research, education and healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信