与传统手缝技术相比,使用 5 毫米微型内固定器在肠造口术中进行肠吻合术。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Ahmed Gamal Abdelmalek Moursi, Stephan Rohleder, Marilena Christofi, Oliver J Muensterer, Tatjana T König
{"title":"与传统手缝技术相比,使用 5 毫米微型内固定器在肠造口术中进行肠吻合术。","authors":"Ahmed Gamal Abdelmalek Moursi, Stephan Rohleder, Marilena Christofi, Oliver J Muensterer, Tatjana T König","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Enterostomy takedown is common in neonates with Hirschsprung's disease, anorectal malformations, or necrotizing enterocolitis. Stapled bowel anastomosis has become routine in adults, but size of up to 12 mm diameter precludes performing enterostomy takedown in young infants using regular intestinal staplers. After the introduction of miniature (5 mm diameter) staplers, we increasingly used them for enterostomy takedown. This study compares enterostomy takedown using the miniature stapler (MS) to the conventional hand-sewn (HS) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of all children <3 years of age undergoing enterostomy closure at our institution from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, operative times, complications, and outcomes were compared between those who underwent the procedure using MS versus HS technique. Data are quoted as median (range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients were enrolled, including MS (n = 26) and HS (n = 76) anastomoses. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, or indication for enterostomy. Enterostomy takedown using MS was faster [82.5 (44-218) versus 147 (52-381) minutes, p < 0.001) and associated with earlier commencement of feedings [2 (1-6) versus 4 (1-24) days, p = 0.001], as well as shorter length-of-stay [6 (2-20) versus 17 (3-52) days, p < 0.001), compared to the HS technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study that systematically evaluates the novel 5 mm ministapler for enterostomy takedown in young children. Its use was associated with quicker operative times, earlier feeding and shorter hospital stay. These findings are especially relevant in children with co-morbidities who do not tolerate longer anesthesia times. Randomized, controlled trials should be performed to prospectively confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"162041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intestinal Anastomosis During Enterostomy Takedown Using a 5 mm Miniature Endostapler Compared to Conventional Handsewn Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Gamal Abdelmalek Moursi, Stephan Rohleder, Marilena Christofi, Oliver J Muensterer, Tatjana T König\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Enterostomy takedown is common in neonates with Hirschsprung's disease, anorectal malformations, or necrotizing enterocolitis. Stapled bowel anastomosis has become routine in adults, but size of up to 12 mm diameter precludes performing enterostomy takedown in young infants using regular intestinal staplers. After the introduction of miniature (5 mm diameter) staplers, we increasingly used them for enterostomy takedown. This study compares enterostomy takedown using the miniature stapler (MS) to the conventional hand-sewn (HS) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of all children <3 years of age undergoing enterostomy closure at our institution from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, operative times, complications, and outcomes were compared between those who underwent the procedure using MS versus HS technique. Data are quoted as median (range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients were enrolled, including MS (n = 26) and HS (n = 76) anastomoses. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, or indication for enterostomy. Enterostomy takedown using MS was faster [82.5 (44-218) versus 147 (52-381) minutes, p < 0.001) and associated with earlier commencement of feedings [2 (1-6) versus 4 (1-24) days, p = 0.001], as well as shorter length-of-stay [6 (2-20) versus 17 (3-52) days, p < 0.001), compared to the HS technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study that systematically evaluates the novel 5 mm ministapler for enterostomy takedown in young children. Its use was associated with quicker operative times, earlier feeding and shorter hospital stay. These findings are especially relevant in children with co-morbidities who do not tolerate longer anesthesia times. Randomized, controlled trials should be performed to prospectively confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"162041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162041\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肠造口术常见于患有赫氏病、肛门直肠畸形或坏死性小肠结肠炎的新生儿。使用订书机进行肠吻合术已成为成人的常规手术,但由于婴儿肠管直径最大可达 12 毫米,因此无法使用普通肠订书机进行肠造口术。微型(直径 5 毫米)订书机问世后,我们越来越多地将其用于肠造口术。本研究比较了使用微型订书机(MS)和传统手缝(HS)技术进行肠造口术:方法:对所有患儿进行回顾性研究:共有 102 名患者入选,包括 MS(26 人)和 HS(76 人)吻合术。在年龄、性别和肠造口术适应症方面没有统计学差异。使用 MS 的肠造口术拆线更快[82.5 (44-218) 分钟对 147 (52-381) 分钟,P 结论:这是第一项对新型 5 毫米微型切割器在幼儿肠造口术中的应用进行系统评估的研究。使用该器械可缩短手术时间、提前进食并缩短住院时间。这些发现尤其适用于合并有多种疾病、不能耐受较长时间麻醉的儿童。应进行随机对照试验以前瞻性地证实这些发现:证据等级:三级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intestinal Anastomosis During Enterostomy Takedown Using a 5 mm Miniature Endostapler Compared to Conventional Handsewn Technique.

Aim: Enterostomy takedown is common in neonates with Hirschsprung's disease, anorectal malformations, or necrotizing enterocolitis. Stapled bowel anastomosis has become routine in adults, but size of up to 12 mm diameter precludes performing enterostomy takedown in young infants using regular intestinal staplers. After the introduction of miniature (5 mm diameter) staplers, we increasingly used them for enterostomy takedown. This study compares enterostomy takedown using the miniature stapler (MS) to the conventional hand-sewn (HS) technique.

Methods: Retrospective review of all children <3 years of age undergoing enterostomy closure at our institution from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, operative times, complications, and outcomes were compared between those who underwent the procedure using MS versus HS technique. Data are quoted as median (range).

Results: A total of 102 patients were enrolled, including MS (n = 26) and HS (n = 76) anastomoses. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, or indication for enterostomy. Enterostomy takedown using MS was faster [82.5 (44-218) versus 147 (52-381) minutes, p < 0.001) and associated with earlier commencement of feedings [2 (1-6) versus 4 (1-24) days, p = 0.001], as well as shorter length-of-stay [6 (2-20) versus 17 (3-52) days, p < 0.001), compared to the HS technique.

Conclusions: This is the first study that systematically evaluates the novel 5 mm ministapler for enterostomy takedown in young children. Its use was associated with quicker operative times, earlier feeding and shorter hospital stay. These findings are especially relevant in children with co-morbidities who do not tolerate longer anesthesia times. Randomized, controlled trials should be performed to prospectively confirm these findings.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信