{"title":"何时完成超车动作才安全?模拟驾驶员超越骑自行车者后返回的决定","authors":"Alexander Rasch;Carol Flannagan;Marco Dozza","doi":"10.1109/TITS.2024.3454768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For cyclists, being overtaken represents a safety risk of possibly being side-swiped or cut in by overtaking drivers. For drivers, such maneuvers are challenging–not only do they need to decide when to initiate the maneuver, but they also need to time their return well to complete the maneuver. In the presence of oncoming traffic, the problem of completing an overtaking maneuver extends to balancing head-on with side-swipe collision risks. Active safety systems such as blind-spot or forward-collision warning systems, or, more recently, automated driving features, may assist drivers in avoiding such collisions and completing the maneuver successfully. However, such systems must interact carefully with the driver and prevent false-positive alerts that reduce the driver’s trust in the system. In this study, we developed a driver-behavior model of the drivers’ return onset in cyclist-overtaking maneuvers that could improve such a safety system. To provide cumulative evidence about driver behavior, we used data from two different sources: test track and naturalistic driving. We developed Bayesian survival models for the two datasets that can predict the probability of a driver returning, given time-varying inputs about the current situation. We evaluated the models in an in-sample and out-of-sample evaluation. Both models showed that drivers use the displacement of the cyclist to time their return decision, which is accelerated if an oncoming vehicle is present and close. We discuss how the models could be integrated into an active-safety system to improve driver acceptance.","PeriodicalId":13416,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"25 11","pages":"15587-15599"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10705323","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Is It Safe to Complete an Overtaking Maneuver? Modeling Drivers’ Decision to Return After Passing a Cyclist\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Rasch;Carol Flannagan;Marco Dozza\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TITS.2024.3454768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For cyclists, being overtaken represents a safety risk of possibly being side-swiped or cut in by overtaking drivers. For drivers, such maneuvers are challenging–not only do they need to decide when to initiate the maneuver, but they also need to time their return well to complete the maneuver. In the presence of oncoming traffic, the problem of completing an overtaking maneuver extends to balancing head-on with side-swipe collision risks. Active safety systems such as blind-spot or forward-collision warning systems, or, more recently, automated driving features, may assist drivers in avoiding such collisions and completing the maneuver successfully. However, such systems must interact carefully with the driver and prevent false-positive alerts that reduce the driver’s trust in the system. In this study, we developed a driver-behavior model of the drivers’ return onset in cyclist-overtaking maneuvers that could improve such a safety system. To provide cumulative evidence about driver behavior, we used data from two different sources: test track and naturalistic driving. We developed Bayesian survival models for the two datasets that can predict the probability of a driver returning, given time-varying inputs about the current situation. We evaluated the models in an in-sample and out-of-sample evaluation. Both models showed that drivers use the displacement of the cyclist to time their return decision, which is accelerated if an oncoming vehicle is present and close. We discuss how the models could be integrated into an active-safety system to improve driver acceptance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems\",\"volume\":\"25 11\",\"pages\":\"15587-15599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10705323\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10705323/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10705323/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
When Is It Safe to Complete an Overtaking Maneuver? Modeling Drivers’ Decision to Return After Passing a Cyclist
For cyclists, being overtaken represents a safety risk of possibly being side-swiped or cut in by overtaking drivers. For drivers, such maneuvers are challenging–not only do they need to decide when to initiate the maneuver, but they also need to time their return well to complete the maneuver. In the presence of oncoming traffic, the problem of completing an overtaking maneuver extends to balancing head-on with side-swipe collision risks. Active safety systems such as blind-spot or forward-collision warning systems, or, more recently, automated driving features, may assist drivers in avoiding such collisions and completing the maneuver successfully. However, such systems must interact carefully with the driver and prevent false-positive alerts that reduce the driver’s trust in the system. In this study, we developed a driver-behavior model of the drivers’ return onset in cyclist-overtaking maneuvers that could improve such a safety system. To provide cumulative evidence about driver behavior, we used data from two different sources: test track and naturalistic driving. We developed Bayesian survival models for the two datasets that can predict the probability of a driver returning, given time-varying inputs about the current situation. We evaluated the models in an in-sample and out-of-sample evaluation. Both models showed that drivers use the displacement of the cyclist to time their return decision, which is accelerated if an oncoming vehicle is present and close. We discuss how the models could be integrated into an active-safety system to improve driver acceptance.
期刊介绍:
The theoretical, experimental and operational aspects of electrical and electronics engineering and information technologies as applied to Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Intelligent Transportation Systems are defined as those systems utilizing synergistic technologies and systems engineering concepts to develop and improve transportation systems of all kinds. The scope of this interdisciplinary activity includes the promotion, consolidation and coordination of ITS technical activities among IEEE entities, and providing a focus for cooperative activities, both internally and externally.