与芳香化酶抑制剂相关的不良事件:真实世界数据集和药物基因相互作用网络分析》。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Si-Qi Zhang, Shujing Jia, Xiang Li, Rui-Rui Hu, Zhanyang Luo, Junhai Wang, Hongyan Xi
{"title":"与芳香化酶抑制剂相关的不良事件:真实世界数据集和药物基因相互作用网络分析》。","authors":"Si-Qi Zhang, Shujing Jia, Xiang Li, Rui-Rui Hu, Zhanyang Luo, Junhai Wang, Hongyan Xi","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2424443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are commonly used to treat postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer, but there is currently a lack of comprehensive safety reports on AIs in large-scale cohorts.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance survey based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, retrieving relevant reports from the 2004 to the 2023, aiming to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of adverse reactions associated with AIs. In addition, we elucidated the potential toxicological mechanisms of AIs related adverse events through functional enrichment analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,933 adverse event reports related to AIs were collected, and there were 642 positive signals at the preferred term level. The top three signal intensities for anastrozole are: antiphospholipid syndrome, plantar fasciitis and autoimmune pancreatitis. The top three signal intensities for letrozole are: androgenetic alopecia and myosclerosis, pneumonic herpes virus. The top three signal intensities for exemestane are: infection reactivation, thyroxine free decreased and dilatation atrial. In terms of onset time, letrozole has the earliest onset time overall, followed by exemestane, and finally anastrozole.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research corroborates the typical adverse events linked to AIs while highlighting potential safety concerns in their real-world clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events associated with aromatase inhibitors: an analysis of real-world datasets and drug-gene interaction network.\",\"authors\":\"Si-Qi Zhang, Shujing Jia, Xiang Li, Rui-Rui Hu, Zhanyang Luo, Junhai Wang, Hongyan Xi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2424443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are commonly used to treat postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer, but there is currently a lack of comprehensive safety reports on AIs in large-scale cohorts.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance survey based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, retrieving relevant reports from the 2004 to the 2023, aiming to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of adverse reactions associated with AIs. In addition, we elucidated the potential toxicological mechanisms of AIs related adverse events through functional enrichment analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,933 adverse event reports related to AIs were collected, and there were 642 positive signals at the preferred term level. The top three signal intensities for anastrozole are: antiphospholipid syndrome, plantar fasciitis and autoimmune pancreatitis. The top three signal intensities for letrozole are: androgenetic alopecia and myosclerosis, pneumonic herpes virus. The top three signal intensities for exemestane are: infection reactivation, thyroxine free decreased and dilatation atrial. In terms of onset time, letrozole has the earliest onset time overall, followed by exemestane, and finally anastrozole.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research corroborates the typical adverse events linked to AIs while highlighting potential safety concerns in their real-world clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2424443\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2424443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)是治疗绝经后激素受体阳性乳腺癌的常用药物,但目前缺乏大规模队列中关于AIs的全面安全性报告:我们基于美国食品药品管理局的不良事件报告系统进行了一项回顾性药物警戒调查,检索了从 2004 年第一季度到 2023 年第三季度的相关报告,旨在对临床实践中常用人工合成药物的相关不良反应进行全面的比较分析。不良事件信号采用不成比例分析法进行评估。此外,我们还通过对与人工合成药物相互作用的人类基因进行功能富集分析,阐明了芳香化酶抑制剂相关不良反应的潜在毒理学机制:结果:共收集了 7,933 份与 AIs 相关的不良事件报告,其中有 642 个首选术语级别的阳性信号。阿那曲唑的前三个信号强度分别是:抗磷脂综合征、足底筋膜炎和自身免疫性胰腺炎。来曲唑的前三位信号强度是:雄激素性脱发和肌硬化症、肺疱疹病毒。依西美坦的前三位信号强度是:感染再激活、游离甲状腺素减少和心房扩张。从发病时间来看,来曲唑的发病时间最早,其次是依西美坦,最后是阿那曲唑:我们的研究证实了与人工合成药物相关的典型不良事件,同时强调了在实际临床应用中可能存在的安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse events associated with aromatase inhibitors: an analysis of real-world datasets and drug-gene interaction network.

Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are commonly used to treat postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer, but there is currently a lack of comprehensive safety reports on AIs in large-scale cohorts.

Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance survey based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, retrieving relevant reports from the 2004 to the 2023, aiming to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of adverse reactions associated with AIs. In addition, we elucidated the potential toxicological mechanisms of AIs related adverse events through functional enrichment analysis.

Results: A total of 7,933 adverse event reports related to AIs were collected, and there were 642 positive signals at the preferred term level. The top three signal intensities for anastrozole are: antiphospholipid syndrome, plantar fasciitis and autoimmune pancreatitis. The top three signal intensities for letrozole are: androgenetic alopecia and myosclerosis, pneumonic herpes virus. The top three signal intensities for exemestane are: infection reactivation, thyroxine free decreased and dilatation atrial. In terms of onset time, letrozole has the earliest onset time overall, followed by exemestane, and finally anastrozole.

Conclusions: Our research corroborates the typical adverse events linked to AIs while highlighting potential safety concerns in their real-world clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信