在使用 HA380 血滤芯进行实验性血液吸附过程中去除美罗培南和哌拉西林。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Taku Furukawa, Yugeesh Lankadeva, Ian Baldwin, Pei Chen Connie Ow, Sally Hood, Antoine Schneider, Laurent A Decosterd, Clive N May, Rinaldo Bellomo
{"title":"在使用 HA380 血滤芯进行实验性血液吸附过程中去除美罗培南和哌拉西林。","authors":"Taku Furukawa, Yugeesh Lankadeva, Ian Baldwin, Pei Chen Connie Ow, Sally Hood, Antoine Schneider, Laurent A Decosterd, Clive N May, Rinaldo Bellomo","doi":"10.1159/000542332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hemoadsorption can be used as adjunctive therapy for sepsis. However, there is limited evidence regarding its antibiotic removal. In this in vivo preclinical study, we aimed to evaluate the removal of meropenem and piperacillin with the HA380 hemoadsorption cartridge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy adult sheep (n = 6) received 2 g of meropenem, and 4 g of piperacillin intravenously for 30 minutes followed by hemoadsorption with a HA380 cartridge at a blood flow rate of 120 mL/min for 4 hours. The sorbent-based removal ratio, clearance, and mass removal were calculated at multiple time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sorbent-based removal ratio of meropenem decreased from 95.4% (SD 1.8) at 10 minutes to less than 20% at 4-hours of hemoadsorption. Its cumulative sorbent-based mass removal was 386.6 mg (SD 78.8) over 4 hours with 65.6 % (SD 7.1) occurring in the first 60 minutes. In contrast, the sorbent-based removal ratio of piperacillin decreased more gradually from 98.4% (SD 0.6) at 10 minutes to 37.4% (SD 7.2) at 4 hours. Its cumulative sorbent-based mass removal was 647.4 mg (SD 191.3) over 4 hours with 63.4% (SD 4.2) occurring in the first 60 minutes. The overall sorbent-based clearance of piperacillin was significantly greater than meropenem (Pgroup < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hemoadsoprtion with the HA380 cartridge removed meropenem and piperacillin throughout a 4-hour period, with high clearances at the start. Our findings can be used to inform dosing decisions during hemoadsorption in septic patients, there may be the need to consider increasing the doses of these antibiotics by 15-25 % to prevent underdosing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of meropenem and piperacillin during experimental hemoadsorption with the HA380 cartridge.\",\"authors\":\"Taku Furukawa, Yugeesh Lankadeva, Ian Baldwin, Pei Chen Connie Ow, Sally Hood, Antoine Schneider, Laurent A Decosterd, Clive N May, Rinaldo Bellomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hemoadsorption can be used as adjunctive therapy for sepsis. However, there is limited evidence regarding its antibiotic removal. In this in vivo preclinical study, we aimed to evaluate the removal of meropenem and piperacillin with the HA380 hemoadsorption cartridge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy adult sheep (n = 6) received 2 g of meropenem, and 4 g of piperacillin intravenously for 30 minutes followed by hemoadsorption with a HA380 cartridge at a blood flow rate of 120 mL/min for 4 hours. The sorbent-based removal ratio, clearance, and mass removal were calculated at multiple time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sorbent-based removal ratio of meropenem decreased from 95.4% (SD 1.8) at 10 minutes to less than 20% at 4-hours of hemoadsorption. Its cumulative sorbent-based mass removal was 386.6 mg (SD 78.8) over 4 hours with 65.6 % (SD 7.1) occurring in the first 60 minutes. In contrast, the sorbent-based removal ratio of piperacillin decreased more gradually from 98.4% (SD 0.6) at 10 minutes to 37.4% (SD 7.2) at 4 hours. Its cumulative sorbent-based mass removal was 647.4 mg (SD 191.3) over 4 hours with 63.4% (SD 4.2) occurring in the first 60 minutes. The overall sorbent-based clearance of piperacillin was significantly greater than meropenem (Pgroup < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hemoadsoprtion with the HA380 cartridge removed meropenem and piperacillin throughout a 4-hour period, with high clearances at the start. Our findings can be used to inform dosing decisions during hemoadsorption in septic patients, there may be the need to consider increasing the doses of these antibiotics by 15-25 % to prevent underdosing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Purification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Purification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542332\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:血液吸附可作为败血症的辅助疗法。然而,有关其去除抗生素的证据却很有限。在这项体内临床前研究中,我们旨在评估 HA380 血液吸附盒对美罗培南和哌拉西林的清除率。方法:健康成年绵羊(n = 6)静脉注射 2 克美罗培南和 4 克哌拉西林 30 分钟,然后用 HA380 血液吸附盒以 120 毫升/分钟的血流速度吸附 4 小时。在多个时间点计算基于吸附剂的去除率、清除率和去除质量:结果:基于吸附剂的美罗培南去除率从 10 分钟时的 95.4%(SD 1.8)降至血液吸附 4 小时时的 20%以下。在 4 小时内,基于吸附剂的累积去除率为 386.6 毫克(标准差 78.8),其中 65.6%(标准差 7.1)发生在前 60 分钟。相比之下,哌拉西林的吸附剂去除率从 10 分钟时的 98.4%(标准差 0.6)逐渐下降到 4 小时时的 37.4%(标准差 7.2)。在 4 小时内,吸附剂对哌拉西林的累积清除量为 647.4 毫克(标度 191.3),其中 63.4%(标度 4.2)发生在最初的 60 分钟内。哌拉西林的吸附剂总清除率明显高于美罗培南(Pgroup < 0.0001):结论:使用 HA380 血滤芯在 4 小时内清除了美罗培南和哌拉西林,开始时清除率较高。我们的研究结果可用于脓毒症患者血液吸附过程中的剂量决策,可能需要考虑将这些抗生素的剂量增加 15-25%,以防止剂量不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removal of meropenem and piperacillin during experimental hemoadsorption with the HA380 cartridge.

Introduction: Hemoadsorption can be used as adjunctive therapy for sepsis. However, there is limited evidence regarding its antibiotic removal. In this in vivo preclinical study, we aimed to evaluate the removal of meropenem and piperacillin with the HA380 hemoadsorption cartridge.

Methods: Healthy adult sheep (n = 6) received 2 g of meropenem, and 4 g of piperacillin intravenously for 30 minutes followed by hemoadsorption with a HA380 cartridge at a blood flow rate of 120 mL/min for 4 hours. The sorbent-based removal ratio, clearance, and mass removal were calculated at multiple time points.

Results: The sorbent-based removal ratio of meropenem decreased from 95.4% (SD 1.8) at 10 minutes to less than 20% at 4-hours of hemoadsorption. Its cumulative sorbent-based mass removal was 386.6 mg (SD 78.8) over 4 hours with 65.6 % (SD 7.1) occurring in the first 60 minutes. In contrast, the sorbent-based removal ratio of piperacillin decreased more gradually from 98.4% (SD 0.6) at 10 minutes to 37.4% (SD 7.2) at 4 hours. Its cumulative sorbent-based mass removal was 647.4 mg (SD 191.3) over 4 hours with 63.4% (SD 4.2) occurring in the first 60 minutes. The overall sorbent-based clearance of piperacillin was significantly greater than meropenem (Pgroup < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Hemoadsoprtion with the HA380 cartridge removed meropenem and piperacillin throughout a 4-hour period, with high clearances at the start. Our findings can be used to inform dosing decisions during hemoadsorption in septic patients, there may be the need to consider increasing the doses of these antibiotics by 15-25 % to prevent underdosing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Purification
Blood Purification 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信