Hong Tao, Fang Yu, Li Yang, Xiaozhu Pei, Saiping Mao, Xing Fan
{"title":"比较脱氧核糖核酸甲基化分析和细胞学检测妇科门诊患者中人类乳头瘤病毒阳性高危妇女宫颈癌（前）的性能。","authors":"Hong Tao, Fang Yu, Li Yang, Xiaozhu Pei, Saiping Mao, Xing Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1<sup>m</sup>) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPC<sup>m</sup>), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population.\",\"authors\":\"Hong Tao, Fang Yu, Li Yang, Xiaozhu Pei, Saiping Mao, Xing Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1<sup>m</sup>) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPC<sup>m</sup>), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAX1<sup>m</sup> and GYPC<sup>m</sup> demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13126-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population.
Background: Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance.
Methods: A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1m) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPCm), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18.
Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1m and GYPCm in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1m and GYPCm were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1m and GYPCm for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1m and GYPCm for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1m and GYPCm resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results.
Conclusions: PAX1m and GYPCm demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.
期刊介绍：
BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
