妊娠高血压的器官特异性管理方法--证据与传统。传统。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Steven Clark, George Saade, Mary Tolcher, Michael Belfort, Dwight J Rouse, Robert M Silver, Avni Kapadia, Nathan Sundgren, Sai Saridey, Baha M Sibai
{"title":"妊娠高血压的器官特异性管理方法--证据与传统。传统。","authors":"Steven Clark, George Saade, Mary Tolcher, Michael Belfort, Dwight J Rouse, Robert M Silver, Avni Kapadia, Nathan Sundgren, Sai Saridey, Baha M Sibai","doi":"10.1055/a-2459-8748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of hypertensive disease in pregnancy is currently guided by practice recommendations based largely on observational data from a half century ago and has changed only superficially since that time. These recommendations are both narrowly prescriptive (women without traditional features of severe disease should all be delivered at exactly 37 weeks and 0 days,) and at the same time frustratingly ambiguous (the presence of epigastric pain unresponsive to repeat analgesics precludes expectant management at any gestational age, regardless of laboratory studies.) Guidelines which ignore recent data from the obstetric, pediatric and internal medicine literature too often lead practitioners to be more aggressive than necessary in the delivery of very premature pregnancies, and, conversely, more complacent than patient safety would support in prolonging pregnancy with advanced fetal maturity. We present here an alternative, organ-specific based approach to the management of gestational hypertension which allows and encourages practitioners to formulate a management plan based on a thoughtful and, when possible, evidence- based synthesis of the continuous variables of blood pressure, degree of organ dysfunction and response to treatment, gestational age, and patient balancing of maternal and fetal/neonatal risks. Such clinical care is more complex and nuanced than simply basing life-altering critical management decisions, including timing of delivery, on whether the patient does, or does not have any one of the conditions described by box 4 of the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice guidelines. Nonetheless, we believe this approach will not only improve care but will also open the door to useful investigations into prevention and management of the various entities traditionally considered as the same disease process.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN ORGAN-SPECIFIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF GESTATIONAL HYPERTENSION - EVIDENCE VS. TRADITION.\",\"authors\":\"Steven Clark, George Saade, Mary Tolcher, Michael Belfort, Dwight J Rouse, Robert M Silver, Avni Kapadia, Nathan Sundgren, Sai Saridey, Baha M Sibai\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2459-8748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of hypertensive disease in pregnancy is currently guided by practice recommendations based largely on observational data from a half century ago and has changed only superficially since that time. These recommendations are both narrowly prescriptive (women without traditional features of severe disease should all be delivered at exactly 37 weeks and 0 days,) and at the same time frustratingly ambiguous (the presence of epigastric pain unresponsive to repeat analgesics precludes expectant management at any gestational age, regardless of laboratory studies.) Guidelines which ignore recent data from the obstetric, pediatric and internal medicine literature too often lead practitioners to be more aggressive than necessary in the delivery of very premature pregnancies, and, conversely, more complacent than patient safety would support in prolonging pregnancy with advanced fetal maturity. We present here an alternative, organ-specific based approach to the management of gestational hypertension which allows and encourages practitioners to formulate a management plan based on a thoughtful and, when possible, evidence- based synthesis of the continuous variables of blood pressure, degree of organ dysfunction and response to treatment, gestational age, and patient balancing of maternal and fetal/neonatal risks. Such clinical care is more complex and nuanced than simply basing life-altering critical management decisions, including timing of delivery, on whether the patient does, or does not have any one of the conditions described by box 4 of the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice guidelines. Nonetheless, we believe this approach will not only improve care but will also open the door to useful investigations into prevention and management of the various entities traditionally considered as the same disease process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2459-8748\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2459-8748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,对妊娠期高血压疾病的管理主要是根据半个世纪前的观察数据提出的实践建议,自那时以来,这些建议仅发生了表面上的变化。这些建议既有狭隘的规定性(没有严重疾病传统特征的产妇都应在 37 周零 0 天时分娩),同时又有令人沮丧的模糊性(无论实验室研究结果如何,出现对重复镇痛药无反应的上腹痛就排除了在任何孕周进行预产期管理的可能性)。忽视产科、儿科和内科文献最新数据的指南往往导致医生在处理极早产妊娠时过于激进,而反过来,在延长胎儿成熟度较高的妊娠期时又过于自满,而忽视了患者的安全。我们在此提出另一种基于器官特异性的妊娠高血压管理方法,该方法允许并鼓励医生根据血压、器官功能障碍程度和对治疗的反应、孕龄、患者对孕产妇和胎儿/新生儿风险的平衡等连续变量,在可能的情况下,以证据为基础,深思熟虑地制定管理计划。这种临床护理比简单地根据患者是否患有现行美国妇产科医师学会实践指南中方框 4 所描述的任何一种疾病来做出包括分娩时机在内的改变生命的关键管理决定更为复杂和细致。尽管如此,我们相信这种方法不仅能改善护理,还能为传统上被视为同一疾病过程的各种实体的预防和管理进行有益的研究打开大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AN ORGAN-SPECIFIC APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF GESTATIONAL HYPERTENSION - EVIDENCE VS. TRADITION.

The management of hypertensive disease in pregnancy is currently guided by practice recommendations based largely on observational data from a half century ago and has changed only superficially since that time. These recommendations are both narrowly prescriptive (women without traditional features of severe disease should all be delivered at exactly 37 weeks and 0 days,) and at the same time frustratingly ambiguous (the presence of epigastric pain unresponsive to repeat analgesics precludes expectant management at any gestational age, regardless of laboratory studies.) Guidelines which ignore recent data from the obstetric, pediatric and internal medicine literature too often lead practitioners to be more aggressive than necessary in the delivery of very premature pregnancies, and, conversely, more complacent than patient safety would support in prolonging pregnancy with advanced fetal maturity. We present here an alternative, organ-specific based approach to the management of gestational hypertension which allows and encourages practitioners to formulate a management plan based on a thoughtful and, when possible, evidence- based synthesis of the continuous variables of blood pressure, degree of organ dysfunction and response to treatment, gestational age, and patient balancing of maternal and fetal/neonatal risks. Such clinical care is more complex and nuanced than simply basing life-altering critical management decisions, including timing of delivery, on whether the patient does, or does not have any one of the conditions described by box 4 of the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice guidelines. Nonetheless, we believe this approach will not only improve care but will also open the door to useful investigations into prevention and management of the various entities traditionally considered as the same disease process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信