在对一名怀孕患者进行SIB-VMAT肉瘤治疗时,对C型臂直列加速器和O型环直列加速器胎儿剂量疏散的比较分析:技术说明和病例报告。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wesley Rivais, Louis Constine, Matthew Pacella, Neil Joyce, Maimuna Nagey, Matthew Webster, Jihyung Yoon, Hyunuk Jung, Sean Tanny, Olga Maria Dona Lemus, Dandan Zheng
{"title":"在对一名怀孕患者进行SIB-VMAT肉瘤治疗时,对C型臂直列加速器和O型环直列加速器胎儿剂量疏散的比较分析:技术说明和病例报告。","authors":"Wesley Rivais, Louis Constine, Matthew Pacella, Neil Joyce, Maimuna Nagey, Matthew Webster, Jihyung Yoon, Hyunuk Jung, Sean Tanny, Olga Maria Dona Lemus, Dandan Zheng","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effect of two linacs designs on fetal dose sparing on a pregnant patient, including estimation of the fetal dose, and the effect of a lead apron.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A patient with a high-grade sarcoma located in the right knee/lower thigh was prescribed 51 Gy (1.7 Gy/Fx) with a simultaneous-integrated-boost (SIB) of 60 Gy to a smaller volume, starting in the 26th gestational week. Volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) plans with 6MV-FFF were developed using identical dosimetric constraints on a Varian Truebeam Edge with HD-MLC and a Varian Halcyon with double-stacked MLC. Based on patient dimension measurements, an anthropomorphic phantom was constructed using a Rando phantom and saline bags in the patient's Vac-Lok bag. Phantom measurements were performed using OSLDs and TLDs placed at three different planes, corresponding to the pubis, the umbilicus, and the fundus based on patient measurements and projected gestational age, to estimate the fetal dose. Three experimental scenarios were measured, each with CBCT-based image guidance for an accurate, reproducible setup: Edge, Halcyon, and Halcyon with a tri-folded lead apron (0.5 mm × 3 = 1.5 mm Pb) over the phantom abdomen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Plan quality and total MUs are comparable between the Edge and Halcyon plans. The OSLD-measured whole-course dose to the pubis, umbilicus, and fundus were 18.8, 13.1, and 11.7 cGy, respectively, on Halcyon, on average 27.8% lower than Edge. The repeatability within either dosimeter was good, although TLD showed systematically lower doses. Importantly, both dosimetry systems showed a lower measured fetal dose for the Halcyon plan compared with the Edge plan. Adding a tri-folded lead apron over the abdomen did not meaningfully lower the measured dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this case study, Halcyon demonstrated a better sparing of out-of-field fetal dose compared to TrueBeam Edge. It was shown that lead aprons do not provide additional fetal dose sparing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of fetal dose sparing between a C-arm linac and an O-ring linac in a SIB-VMAT sarcoma treatment for a pregnant patient: A technical note and case report.\",\"authors\":\"Wesley Rivais, Louis Constine, Matthew Pacella, Neil Joyce, Maimuna Nagey, Matthew Webster, Jihyung Yoon, Hyunuk Jung, Sean Tanny, Olga Maria Dona Lemus, Dandan Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effect of two linacs designs on fetal dose sparing on a pregnant patient, including estimation of the fetal dose, and the effect of a lead apron.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A patient with a high-grade sarcoma located in the right knee/lower thigh was prescribed 51 Gy (1.7 Gy/Fx) with a simultaneous-integrated-boost (SIB) of 60 Gy to a smaller volume, starting in the 26th gestational week. Volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) plans with 6MV-FFF were developed using identical dosimetric constraints on a Varian Truebeam Edge with HD-MLC and a Varian Halcyon with double-stacked MLC. Based on patient dimension measurements, an anthropomorphic phantom was constructed using a Rando phantom and saline bags in the patient's Vac-Lok bag. Phantom measurements were performed using OSLDs and TLDs placed at three different planes, corresponding to the pubis, the umbilicus, and the fundus based on patient measurements and projected gestational age, to estimate the fetal dose. Three experimental scenarios were measured, each with CBCT-based image guidance for an accurate, reproducible setup: Edge, Halcyon, and Halcyon with a tri-folded lead apron (0.5 mm × 3 = 1.5 mm Pb) over the phantom abdomen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Plan quality and total MUs are comparable between the Edge and Halcyon plans. The OSLD-measured whole-course dose to the pubis, umbilicus, and fundus were 18.8, 13.1, and 11.7 cGy, respectively, on Halcyon, on average 27.8% lower than Edge. The repeatability within either dosimeter was good, although TLD showed systematically lower doses. Importantly, both dosimetry systems showed a lower measured fetal dose for the Halcyon plan compared with the Edge plan. Adding a tri-folded lead apron over the abdomen did not meaningfully lower the measured dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this case study, Halcyon demonstrated a better sparing of out-of-field fetal dose compared to TrueBeam Edge. It was shown that lead aprons do not provide additional fetal dose sparing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14556\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种直列加速器设计对妊娠患者胎儿剂量疏导的影响,包括胎儿剂量的估算和铅围裙的影响:方法:一名右膝/大腿下部罹患高级别肉瘤的患者在第26个孕周时开始接受51 Gy(1.7 Gy/Fx)的放疗,并在较小的体积上同时进行60 Gy的综合增强(SIB)。在配备 HD-MLC 的瓦里安 Truebeam Edge 和配备双层 MLC 的瓦里安 Halcyon 上,使用相同的剂量限制条件制定了 6MV-FFF 的容积调强放射治疗(VMAT)计划。根据患者的尺寸测量结果,使用 Rando 模型和患者 Vac-Lok 袋中的生理盐水袋构建了一个拟人模型。根据患者的测量值和预计胎龄,使用放置在耻骨、脐部和眼底三个不同平面上的 OSLD 和 TLD 进行了模型测量,以估算胎儿的剂量。测量了三种实验方案,每种方案都有基于 CBCT 的图像引导,以实现精确、可重复的设置:Edge、Halcyon 和 Halcyon,并在模型腹部覆盖三折铅围裙(0.5 毫米 × 3 = 1.5 毫米铅):Edge和Halcyon计划的计划质量和总MU相当。在 Halcyon 上,OSLD 测量的耻骨、脐部和眼底的全过程剂量分别为 18.8、13.1 和 11.7 cGy,平均比 Edge 低 27.8%。两种剂量计的重复性都很好,但 TLD 显示的剂量明显较低。重要的是,两种剂量测定系统都显示 Halcyon 计划的胎儿测量剂量低于 Edge 计划。在腹部添加三折铅围裙并不能显著降低测量剂量:在这项病例研究中,与 TrueBeam Edge 相比,Halcyon 能更好地消除场外胎儿剂量。结果表明,铅围裙并不能额外减少胎儿的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of fetal dose sparing between a C-arm linac and an O-ring linac in a SIB-VMAT sarcoma treatment for a pregnant patient: A technical note and case report.

Purpose: To compare the effect of two linacs designs on fetal dose sparing on a pregnant patient, including estimation of the fetal dose, and the effect of a lead apron.

Methods: A patient with a high-grade sarcoma located in the right knee/lower thigh was prescribed 51 Gy (1.7 Gy/Fx) with a simultaneous-integrated-boost (SIB) of 60 Gy to a smaller volume, starting in the 26th gestational week. Volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) plans with 6MV-FFF were developed using identical dosimetric constraints on a Varian Truebeam Edge with HD-MLC and a Varian Halcyon with double-stacked MLC. Based on patient dimension measurements, an anthropomorphic phantom was constructed using a Rando phantom and saline bags in the patient's Vac-Lok bag. Phantom measurements were performed using OSLDs and TLDs placed at three different planes, corresponding to the pubis, the umbilicus, and the fundus based on patient measurements and projected gestational age, to estimate the fetal dose. Three experimental scenarios were measured, each with CBCT-based image guidance for an accurate, reproducible setup: Edge, Halcyon, and Halcyon with a tri-folded lead apron (0.5 mm × 3 = 1.5 mm Pb) over the phantom abdomen.

Results: Plan quality and total MUs are comparable between the Edge and Halcyon plans. The OSLD-measured whole-course dose to the pubis, umbilicus, and fundus were 18.8, 13.1, and 11.7 cGy, respectively, on Halcyon, on average 27.8% lower than Edge. The repeatability within either dosimeter was good, although TLD showed systematically lower doses. Importantly, both dosimetry systems showed a lower measured fetal dose for the Halcyon plan compared with the Edge plan. Adding a tri-folded lead apron over the abdomen did not meaningfully lower the measured dose.

Conclusion: In this case study, Halcyon demonstrated a better sparing of out-of-field fetal dose compared to TrueBeam Edge. It was shown that lead aprons do not provide additional fetal dose sparing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信