营养模型框架:人工结构生态评估的关键指标

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Aurore Raoux , Jessica Salaün , Jean-Philippe Pezy , Baptiste Vivier , Maxime Navon , Maël Deloor , Pascal Claquin , Sylvain Pioch , Nathalie Niquil , Jean-Claude Dauvin
{"title":"营养模型框架:人工结构生态评估的关键指标","authors":"Aurore Raoux ,&nbsp;Jessica Salaün ,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Pezy ,&nbsp;Baptiste Vivier ,&nbsp;Maxime Navon ,&nbsp;Maël Deloor ,&nbsp;Pascal Claquin ,&nbsp;Sylvain Pioch ,&nbsp;Nathalie Niquil ,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Dauvin","doi":"10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the global population expands, marine coastal ecosystems face mounting pressures from human activities, that have led to habitat deterioration and dwindling fishery resources. In this context, Artificial Reefs (ARs) have emerged as one of the promising solutions. They are generally implemented to provide habitat, to create a protective, physical boundary, to support sustainable fisheries and to facilitate ecosystem rehabilitation. Evaluating their ecological performance is crucial to ensuring they meet their objectives. Initially, assessment relied on comparing ARs to natural reefs using mainly ecological metrics which focused on fish assemblage and dynamics. Despite there being more research and documentation on effectiveness today, assessing ARs remains challenging due to the number of environmental factors that can affect the ecological systems. Moreover, ecological studies mainly used metrics that investigated the reef fish populations or ecological metrics such as fish assemblages or trophic structure that are often overlooked in studies that primarily focus on commercial fishery dynamics. Therefore, new ways of assessing artificial reef performance and the set-up of comprehensive metrics which integrate this level of complexity are needed. In this study, we focused on the \"Rade de Cherbourg\" in the English Channel, employing a trophic modeling approach using Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE). The study emphasizes the importance of Ecological Network Analysis (ENA) metrics for evaluating changes in the systems’ properties—such as complexity, flow diversity, and recycling capacity— which result from AR implementation. Furthermore, we identified which metrics are suitable for assessing specific AR objectives. The proposed metrics serve as a command-and-control tool for AR site managers, enabling them to evaluate the performance of each AR objective effectively. With the anticipated increase in AR projects, especially those which compensate for human impact like the Cherbourg ARs, this research offers valuable insights and future perspectives to continuously improve the ecological performance of ARs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21070,"journal":{"name":"Regional Studies in Marine Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A trophic modelling framework: Key metrics for the ecological assessment of artificial structures\",\"authors\":\"Aurore Raoux ,&nbsp;Jessica Salaün ,&nbsp;Jean-Philippe Pezy ,&nbsp;Baptiste Vivier ,&nbsp;Maxime Navon ,&nbsp;Maël Deloor ,&nbsp;Pascal Claquin ,&nbsp;Sylvain Pioch ,&nbsp;Nathalie Niquil ,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Dauvin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the global population expands, marine coastal ecosystems face mounting pressures from human activities, that have led to habitat deterioration and dwindling fishery resources. In this context, Artificial Reefs (ARs) have emerged as one of the promising solutions. They are generally implemented to provide habitat, to create a protective, physical boundary, to support sustainable fisheries and to facilitate ecosystem rehabilitation. Evaluating their ecological performance is crucial to ensuring they meet their objectives. Initially, assessment relied on comparing ARs to natural reefs using mainly ecological metrics which focused on fish assemblage and dynamics. Despite there being more research and documentation on effectiveness today, assessing ARs remains challenging due to the number of environmental factors that can affect the ecological systems. Moreover, ecological studies mainly used metrics that investigated the reef fish populations or ecological metrics such as fish assemblages or trophic structure that are often overlooked in studies that primarily focus on commercial fishery dynamics. Therefore, new ways of assessing artificial reef performance and the set-up of comprehensive metrics which integrate this level of complexity are needed. In this study, we focused on the \\\"Rade de Cherbourg\\\" in the English Channel, employing a trophic modeling approach using Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE). The study emphasizes the importance of Ecological Network Analysis (ENA) metrics for evaluating changes in the systems’ properties—such as complexity, flow diversity, and recycling capacity— which result from AR implementation. Furthermore, we identified which metrics are suitable for assessing specific AR objectives. The proposed metrics serve as a command-and-control tool for AR site managers, enabling them to evaluate the performance of each AR objective effectively. With the anticipated increase in AR projects, especially those which compensate for human impact like the Cherbourg ARs, this research offers valuable insights and future perspectives to continuously improve the ecological performance of ARs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Studies in Marine Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Studies in Marine Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352485524005231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Studies in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352485524005231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球人口的增长,海洋沿岸生态系统面临着来自人类活动的越来越大的压力,这导致了栖息地的恶化和渔业资源的减少。在这种情况下,人工鱼礁(ARs)成为一种很有前景的解决方案。人工鱼礁一般用于提供栖息地、建立保护性物理边界、支持可持续渔业和促进生态系统恢复。评估其生态性能对于确保其达到目标至关重要。起初,评估主要依赖于使用生态指标将 ARs 与天然珊瑚礁进行比较,这些指标侧重于鱼类的组合和动态。尽管目前有关有效性的研究和文献较多,但由于影响生态系统的环境因素较多,因此对 ARs 的评估仍具有挑战性。此外,生态研究主要使用调查珊瑚礁鱼类种群的指标或鱼类组合或营养结构等生态指标,而这些指标在主要关注商业渔业动态的研究中往往被忽视。因此,需要采用新的方法来评估人工鱼礁的性能,并建立能够整合这种复杂程度的综合指标。在这项研究中,我们重点关注英吉利海峡的 "瑟堡礁(Rade de Cherbourg)",使用 Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) 营养模型方法。该研究强调了生态网络分析(ENA)指标对于评估因实施 AR 而导致的系统属性变化(如复杂性、水流多样性和循环能力)的重要性。此外,我们还确定了哪些指标适合评估特定的 AR 目标。所提出的指标可作为 AR 现场管理人员的指挥和控制工具,使他们能够有效评估每个 AR 目标的绩效。随着可持续农业研究项目的预期增加,特别是像瑟堡可持续农业研究项目这样补偿人类影响的项目,这项研究为不断提高可持续农业研究的生态绩效提供了宝贵的见解和未来展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A trophic modelling framework: Key metrics for the ecological assessment of artificial structures
As the global population expands, marine coastal ecosystems face mounting pressures from human activities, that have led to habitat deterioration and dwindling fishery resources. In this context, Artificial Reefs (ARs) have emerged as one of the promising solutions. They are generally implemented to provide habitat, to create a protective, physical boundary, to support sustainable fisheries and to facilitate ecosystem rehabilitation. Evaluating their ecological performance is crucial to ensuring they meet their objectives. Initially, assessment relied on comparing ARs to natural reefs using mainly ecological metrics which focused on fish assemblage and dynamics. Despite there being more research and documentation on effectiveness today, assessing ARs remains challenging due to the number of environmental factors that can affect the ecological systems. Moreover, ecological studies mainly used metrics that investigated the reef fish populations or ecological metrics such as fish assemblages or trophic structure that are often overlooked in studies that primarily focus on commercial fishery dynamics. Therefore, new ways of assessing artificial reef performance and the set-up of comprehensive metrics which integrate this level of complexity are needed. In this study, we focused on the "Rade de Cherbourg" in the English Channel, employing a trophic modeling approach using Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE). The study emphasizes the importance of Ecological Network Analysis (ENA) metrics for evaluating changes in the systems’ properties—such as complexity, flow diversity, and recycling capacity— which result from AR implementation. Furthermore, we identified which metrics are suitable for assessing specific AR objectives. The proposed metrics serve as a command-and-control tool for AR site managers, enabling them to evaluate the performance of each AR objective effectively. With the anticipated increase in AR projects, especially those which compensate for human impact like the Cherbourg ARs, this research offers valuable insights and future perspectives to continuously improve the ecological performance of ARs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Regional Studies in Marine Science
Regional Studies in Marine Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
336
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE will publish scientifically sound papers on regional aspects of maritime and marine resources in estuaries, coastal zones, continental shelf, the seas and oceans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信