{"title":"冷冻、喷雾和真空干燥荠菜蛋白粉及其理化和功能特性","authors":"Ceren Mutlu , Fatma Korkmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.fbp.2024.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to examine the effect of different drying methods on the physicochemical and functional properties of camelina protein. Camelina protein was extracted using the alkaline extraction and isoelectric precipitation method and subsequently dried by freeze, spray, and vacuum-drying. The protein contents of camelina protein powders ranged between 62.5 and 64.1 g/100 g (dry basis). Glutamic acid was the most dominant amino acid for spray-dried and vacuum-dried proteins, while proline was for freeze-dried camelina protein. Camelina proteins had a peak denaturation temperature between 100.5 and 104.3 °C. The surface hydrophobicity of freeze-dried camelina protein (5.8 µg/mg) was lower than others (9.1–19.1 µg/mg). The spray-dried protein showed the highest water-holding capacity (2.9 g/g), emulsion activity (0.53 mL/mL) and stability (0.96 mL/mL), as well as foaming capacity (0.48 mL/mL) and stability (0.92 mL/mL) among camelina proteins. Moreover, spray-dried camelina protein formed gel at a lower concentration (10 %). Consequently, camelina protein powders produced by different drying methods demonstrated different physicochemical and functional properties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12134,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","volume":"148 ","pages":"Pages 559-567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Freeze, spray, and vacuum dried Camelina sativa protein powders and their physicochemical and functional properties\",\"authors\":\"Ceren Mutlu , Fatma Korkmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fbp.2024.10.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The objective of this study was to examine the effect of different drying methods on the physicochemical and functional properties of camelina protein. Camelina protein was extracted using the alkaline extraction and isoelectric precipitation method and subsequently dried by freeze, spray, and vacuum-drying. The protein contents of camelina protein powders ranged between 62.5 and 64.1 g/100 g (dry basis). Glutamic acid was the most dominant amino acid for spray-dried and vacuum-dried proteins, while proline was for freeze-dried camelina protein. Camelina proteins had a peak denaturation temperature between 100.5 and 104.3 °C. The surface hydrophobicity of freeze-dried camelina protein (5.8 µg/mg) was lower than others (9.1–19.1 µg/mg). The spray-dried protein showed the highest water-holding capacity (2.9 g/g), emulsion activity (0.53 mL/mL) and stability (0.96 mL/mL), as well as foaming capacity (0.48 mL/mL) and stability (0.92 mL/mL) among camelina proteins. Moreover, spray-dried camelina protein formed gel at a lower concentration (10 %). Consequently, camelina protein powders produced by different drying methods demonstrated different physicochemical and functional properties.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Bioproducts Processing\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 559-567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Bioproducts Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308524002219\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308524002219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Freeze, spray, and vacuum dried Camelina sativa protein powders and their physicochemical and functional properties
The objective of this study was to examine the effect of different drying methods on the physicochemical and functional properties of camelina protein. Camelina protein was extracted using the alkaline extraction and isoelectric precipitation method and subsequently dried by freeze, spray, and vacuum-drying. The protein contents of camelina protein powders ranged between 62.5 and 64.1 g/100 g (dry basis). Glutamic acid was the most dominant amino acid for spray-dried and vacuum-dried proteins, while proline was for freeze-dried camelina protein. Camelina proteins had a peak denaturation temperature between 100.5 and 104.3 °C. The surface hydrophobicity of freeze-dried camelina protein (5.8 µg/mg) was lower than others (9.1–19.1 µg/mg). The spray-dried protein showed the highest water-holding capacity (2.9 g/g), emulsion activity (0.53 mL/mL) and stability (0.96 mL/mL), as well as foaming capacity (0.48 mL/mL) and stability (0.92 mL/mL) among camelina proteins. Moreover, spray-dried camelina protein formed gel at a lower concentration (10 %). Consequently, camelina protein powders produced by different drying methods demonstrated different physicochemical and functional properties.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering:
Part C
FBP aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in the branches of engineering and science dedicated to the safe processing of biological products. It is the only journal to exploit the synergy between biotechnology, bioprocessing and food engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in equipment or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of food and bioproducts processing.
The journal has a strong emphasis on the interface between engineering and food or bioproducts. Papers that are not likely to be published are those:
• Primarily concerned with food formulation
• That use experimental design techniques to obtain response surfaces but gain little insight from them
• That are empirical and ignore established mechanistic models, e.g., empirical drying curves
• That are primarily concerned about sensory evaluation and colour
• Concern the extraction, encapsulation and/or antioxidant activity of a specific biological material without providing insight that could be applied to a similar but different material,
• Containing only chemical analyses of biological materials.