Gerardo Pellegrino , Achille Tarsitano , Stefano Ratti , Francesco Ceccariglia , Manlio Gessaroli , Carlo Barausse , Subhi Tayeb , Pietro Felice
{"title":"颧骨植入物用于肿瘤和先天性缺陷患者的康复:病例系列。","authors":"Gerardo Pellegrino , Achille Tarsitano , Stefano Ratti , Francesco Ceccariglia , Manlio Gessaroli , Carlo Barausse , Subhi Tayeb , Pietro Felice","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This case series aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of oncologic patients rehabilitated with a zygomatic implant-supported prosthesis. Ten oncologic patients who underwent upper jaw resections due to cancer were enrolled in the study. Zygomatic implants were utilized for rehabilitation according to specified inclusion criteria. Surgical and prosthetic procedures were standardized, and implant and prosthetic survival rates, along with complications, were evaluated. The study cohort comprised 10 patients with a mean age of 66.5 years. A total of 35 implants were placed, with a survival rate of 94.29% at the mean follow-up of 5.78 years. Biological complications affected 40% of patients, while prosthetic complications occurred in 40% of patients, necessitating modifications but with no outright failures. Zygomatic implants offer a viable solution for oncologic patient rehabilitation, particularly in cases where bone grafting is contraindicated or impractical. However, they present medium-to long-term complications that warrant careful consideration. Future research should focus on larger studies and meta-analyses to provide more robust evidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"53 1","pages":"Pages 24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zygomatic implants for rehabilitation of patients with oncologic and congenital defects: A case series\",\"authors\":\"Gerardo Pellegrino , Achille Tarsitano , Stefano Ratti , Francesco Ceccariglia , Manlio Gessaroli , Carlo Barausse , Subhi Tayeb , Pietro Felice\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This case series aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of oncologic patients rehabilitated with a zygomatic implant-supported prosthesis. Ten oncologic patients who underwent upper jaw resections due to cancer were enrolled in the study. Zygomatic implants were utilized for rehabilitation according to specified inclusion criteria. Surgical and prosthetic procedures were standardized, and implant and prosthetic survival rates, along with complications, were evaluated. The study cohort comprised 10 patients with a mean age of 66.5 years. A total of 35 implants were placed, with a survival rate of 94.29% at the mean follow-up of 5.78 years. Biological complications affected 40% of patients, while prosthetic complications occurred in 40% of patients, necessitating modifications but with no outright failures. Zygomatic implants offer a viable solution for oncologic patient rehabilitation, particularly in cases where bone grafting is contraindicated or impractical. However, they present medium-to long-term complications that warrant careful consideration. Future research should focus on larger studies and meta-analyses to provide more robust evidence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 24-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224002841\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224002841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Zygomatic implants for rehabilitation of patients with oncologic and congenital defects: A case series
This case series aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of oncologic patients rehabilitated with a zygomatic implant-supported prosthesis. Ten oncologic patients who underwent upper jaw resections due to cancer were enrolled in the study. Zygomatic implants were utilized for rehabilitation according to specified inclusion criteria. Surgical and prosthetic procedures were standardized, and implant and prosthetic survival rates, along with complications, were evaluated. The study cohort comprised 10 patients with a mean age of 66.5 years. A total of 35 implants were placed, with a survival rate of 94.29% at the mean follow-up of 5.78 years. Biological complications affected 40% of patients, while prosthetic complications occurred in 40% of patients, necessitating modifications but with no outright failures. Zygomatic implants offer a viable solution for oncologic patient rehabilitation, particularly in cases where bone grafting is contraindicated or impractical. However, they present medium-to long-term complications that warrant careful consideration. Future research should focus on larger studies and meta-analyses to provide more robust evidence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included:
• Distraction osteogenesis
• Synthetic bone substitutes
• Fibroblast growth factors
• Fetal wound healing
• Skull base surgery
• Computer-assisted surgery
• Vascularized bone grafts