Sinead Farrelly, Andrea D Boan, John Hartnett, Emily Monsch, Audrey Hartis, Mark Bowden, Steve Kautz, Christine Holmstedt
{"title":"中风后物理治疗中的频繁错误强化训练","authors":"Sinead Farrelly, Andrea D Boan, John Hartnett, Emily Monsch, Audrey Hartis, Mark Bowden, Steve Kautz, Christine Holmstedt","doi":"10.1097/jat.0000000000000237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this pilot trial was to evaluate the impact of increased frequency of physical therapy sessions with error augmentation on functional mobility and disability outcomes in patients with acute stroke. We hypothesized that participants receiving frequent error augmentation physical therapy interventions (F-EA-PT) would demonstrate a higher degree of improvement on functional mobility and disability measures from admission to three post-intervention time points (treatment day 3, discharge, or 90-day follow-up).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We allocated 100 individuals to receive either F-EA-PT or standard-of-care physical therapy (SOC-PT). The F-EA-PT group received physical therapy with error augmentation twice daily for 3 out of the first 5 days of hospitalization, and daily treatment sessions thereafter. Error augmentation training emphasizes impairments throughout mobility to challenge the individual, rather than facilitating normal movement patterns. The SOC-PT group received treatment once daily for 3 to 5 days per week. Assessments included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) and Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS). A repeated measures mixed model approach compared treatment groups for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The F-EA-PT group demonstrated larger magnitudes of reduction of -1.34 on NIHSS (p=0.0426) and -0.81 on mRS (p=0.0037) from admission to 90-day follow-up compared to the SOC-PT group. The F-EA-PT group demonstrated larger magnitudes of change in AM-PAC of 2.12 at treatment day 3 (p=0.0009) and 2.75 at discharge (p<0.0001) compared to SOC-PT. F-EA-PT group experienced greater improvement in PASS over the SOC-PT group with a difference in change of 4.08 at treatment day 3 (p=0.0019) and 4.45 at discharge (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intervening with a regimen focused on increased frequency and error augmentation from a physical therapy standpoint was safe with only one adverse event. It demonstrated significant improvements in functional outcomes post stroke above those seen with standard-of-care regimen, as evidenced by PASS and AM-PAC scores.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04778475.Medical University of South Carolina IRB II Approved 04/20/2021 PRO00108635.</p>","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":"15 3","pages":"65-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequent Error Augmentation Training in Physical Therapy Post Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Sinead Farrelly, Andrea D Boan, John Hartnett, Emily Monsch, Audrey Hartis, Mark Bowden, Steve Kautz, Christine Holmstedt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jat.0000000000000237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this pilot trial was to evaluate the impact of increased frequency of physical therapy sessions with error augmentation on functional mobility and disability outcomes in patients with acute stroke. We hypothesized that participants receiving frequent error augmentation physical therapy interventions (F-EA-PT) would demonstrate a higher degree of improvement on functional mobility and disability measures from admission to three post-intervention time points (treatment day 3, discharge, or 90-day follow-up).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We allocated 100 individuals to receive either F-EA-PT or standard-of-care physical therapy (SOC-PT). The F-EA-PT group received physical therapy with error augmentation twice daily for 3 out of the first 5 days of hospitalization, and daily treatment sessions thereafter. Error augmentation training emphasizes impairments throughout mobility to challenge the individual, rather than facilitating normal movement patterns. The SOC-PT group received treatment once daily for 3 to 5 days per week. Assessments included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) and Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS). A repeated measures mixed model approach compared treatment groups for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The F-EA-PT group demonstrated larger magnitudes of reduction of -1.34 on NIHSS (p=0.0426) and -0.81 on mRS (p=0.0037) from admission to 90-day follow-up compared to the SOC-PT group. The F-EA-PT group demonstrated larger magnitudes of change in AM-PAC of 2.12 at treatment day 3 (p=0.0009) and 2.75 at discharge (p<0.0001) compared to SOC-PT. F-EA-PT group experienced greater improvement in PASS over the SOC-PT group with a difference in change of 4.08 at treatment day 3 (p=0.0019) and 4.45 at discharge (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intervening with a regimen focused on increased frequency and error augmentation from a physical therapy standpoint was safe with only one adverse event. It demonstrated significant improvements in functional outcomes post stroke above those seen with standard-of-care regimen, as evidenced by PASS and AM-PAC scores.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04778475.Medical University of South Carolina IRB II Approved 04/20/2021 PRO00108635.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"65-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jat.0000000000000237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jat.0000000000000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本试验旨在评估增加错误增强理疗次数对急性中风患者功能活动能力和残疾结果的影响。我们假设,从入院到干预后的三个时间点(治疗第 3 天、出院或 90 天随访),频繁接受误差增强物理治疗干预(F-EA-PT)的参与者将在功能活动度和残疾测量方面表现出更大程度的改善:我们将100名患者分配到F-EA-PT或标准护理理疗(SOC-PT)组。F-EA-PT组在住院的前5天中的3天每天接受两次错误增强物理治疗,之后每天接受治疗。误差增强训练强调的是整个移动过程中的障碍,以挑战个体,而不是促进正常的运动模式。SOC-PT组每天接受一次治疗,每周3至5天。评估包括美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、改良兰金量表(mRS)、急性期后护理活动量表(AM-PAC)和卒中姿势评估量表(PASS)。采用重复测量混合模型法比较了治疗组的所有结果:与 SOC-PT 组相比,F-EA-PT 组从入院到 90 天随访的 NIHSS 和 mRS 分别下降了-1.34(p=0.0426)和-0.81(p=0.0037)。F-EA-PT组在治疗第3天和出院时的AM-PAC变化幅度较大,分别为2.12(p=0.0009)和2.75(p结论:从物理治疗的角度来看,以增加频率和增加误差为重点的干预方案是安全的,仅发生了一起不良事件。从 PASS 和 AM-PAC 评分来看,该疗法对中风后功能的改善明显优于标准护理方案:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.唯一标识符:NCT04778475.Medical University of South Carolina IRB II Approved 04/20/2021 PRO00108635.
Frequent Error Augmentation Training in Physical Therapy Post Stroke.
Background: The purpose of this pilot trial was to evaluate the impact of increased frequency of physical therapy sessions with error augmentation on functional mobility and disability outcomes in patients with acute stroke. We hypothesized that participants receiving frequent error augmentation physical therapy interventions (F-EA-PT) would demonstrate a higher degree of improvement on functional mobility and disability measures from admission to three post-intervention time points (treatment day 3, discharge, or 90-day follow-up).
Methods: We allocated 100 individuals to receive either F-EA-PT or standard-of-care physical therapy (SOC-PT). The F-EA-PT group received physical therapy with error augmentation twice daily for 3 out of the first 5 days of hospitalization, and daily treatment sessions thereafter. Error augmentation training emphasizes impairments throughout mobility to challenge the individual, rather than facilitating normal movement patterns. The SOC-PT group received treatment once daily for 3 to 5 days per week. Assessments included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) and Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS). A repeated measures mixed model approach compared treatment groups for all outcomes.
Results: The F-EA-PT group demonstrated larger magnitudes of reduction of -1.34 on NIHSS (p=0.0426) and -0.81 on mRS (p=0.0037) from admission to 90-day follow-up compared to the SOC-PT group. The F-EA-PT group demonstrated larger magnitudes of change in AM-PAC of 2.12 at treatment day 3 (p=0.0009) and 2.75 at discharge (p<0.0001) compared to SOC-PT. F-EA-PT group experienced greater improvement in PASS over the SOC-PT group with a difference in change of 4.08 at treatment day 3 (p=0.0019) and 4.45 at discharge (p=0.001).
Conclusions: Intervening with a regimen focused on increased frequency and error augmentation from a physical therapy standpoint was safe with only one adverse event. It demonstrated significant improvements in functional outcomes post stroke above those seen with standard-of-care regimen, as evidenced by PASS and AM-PAC scores.
Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04778475.Medical University of South Carolina IRB II Approved 04/20/2021 PRO00108635.