{"title":"非小细胞肺癌患者接受新辅助治疗(含/不含免疫疗法)后进行肺切除术的疗效。","authors":"Zhixin Li, Leilei Wu, Chong Wang, Shaodong Wang, Qiankun Chen, Wenxin He","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited data concerning pneumonectomy after preoperative induction therapy. Our study aimed to evaluate feasibility and safety of pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by assessing postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1187 patients who underwent pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed from 3 hospitals in China. Propensity score matching was adopted to form a balanced cohort between neoadjuvant therapy and non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Efficacy and survival were compared for neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neoadjuvant group had larger tumors (4.7 ± 2.2 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.9 cm [P < .001]; cT4, 36.3% vs 19.1% [P < .001]), had a greater rate of N2 metastases (64.5% vs 33.3%; P < .001), and were at a more advanced clinical TNM stage (stage III, 89.4% vs 58.6%; P < .001). No significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed between the groups before and after propensity score matching (43.5% vs 42.9% [P = .975]; 49.4% vs 41.9% [P = .162]). The complete pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was significantly superior to that of chemotherapy alone (27.7% vs 2.0%; P < .001), and no significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed in neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy. The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group also obtained a survival benefit with a 3-year overall survival (79.8% vs 67.5%; P = .001) and a 3-year event-free survival (63.3% vs 41.2%; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After neoadjuvant therapy with immunotherapy, pneumonectomy can be safely performed in selected patients without increased postoperative morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Therapy With or Without Immunotherapy Followed By Pneumonectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Zhixin Li, Leilei Wu, Chong Wang, Shaodong Wang, Qiankun Chen, Wenxin He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited data concerning pneumonectomy after preoperative induction therapy. Our study aimed to evaluate feasibility and safety of pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by assessing postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1187 patients who underwent pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed from 3 hospitals in China. Propensity score matching was adopted to form a balanced cohort between neoadjuvant therapy and non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Efficacy and survival were compared for neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neoadjuvant group had larger tumors (4.7 ± 2.2 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.9 cm [P < .001]; cT4, 36.3% vs 19.1% [P < .001]), had a greater rate of N2 metastases (64.5% vs 33.3%; P < .001), and were at a more advanced clinical TNM stage (stage III, 89.4% vs 58.6%; P < .001). No significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed between the groups before and after propensity score matching (43.5% vs 42.9% [P = .975]; 49.4% vs 41.9% [P = .162]). The complete pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was significantly superior to that of chemotherapy alone (27.7% vs 2.0%; P < .001), and no significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed in neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy. The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group also obtained a survival benefit with a 3-year overall survival (79.8% vs 67.5%; P = .001) and a 3-year event-free survival (63.3% vs 41.2%; P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After neoadjuvant therapy with immunotherapy, pneumonectomy can be safely performed in selected patients without increased postoperative morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.10.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.10.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于术前诱导治疗后的肺切除术的数据有限。我们的研究旨在通过评估术后结果,评估非小细胞肺癌患者接受新辅助免疫疗法后进行肺切除术的可行性和安全性:方法: 我们对中国三家医院的1187例非小细胞肺癌患者进行了回顾性分析。采用倾向分数匹配法(PSM)在新辅助治疗组和非新辅助治疗组之间建立平衡队列。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归来确定术后发病率的风险因素。比较了新辅助治疗联合或不联合免疫疗法的疗效和生存率:结果:新辅助治疗组的肿瘤更大(4.7±2.2 vs. 3.9±1.9cm,PC结论):经过免疫疗法的新辅助治疗后,可以安全地对部分患者实施肺切除术,且不会增加术后发病率。
Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Therapy With or Without Immunotherapy Followed By Pneumonectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Background: There are limited data concerning pneumonectomy after preoperative induction therapy. Our study aimed to evaluate feasibility and safety of pneumonectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by assessing postoperative outcomes.
Methods: A total of 1187 patients who underwent pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed from 3 hospitals in China. Propensity score matching was adopted to form a balanced cohort between neoadjuvant therapy and non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Efficacy and survival were compared for neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy.
Results: The neoadjuvant group had larger tumors (4.7 ± 2.2 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.9 cm [P < .001]; cT4, 36.3% vs 19.1% [P < .001]), had a greater rate of N2 metastases (64.5% vs 33.3%; P < .001), and were at a more advanced clinical TNM stage (stage III, 89.4% vs 58.6%; P < .001). No significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed between the groups before and after propensity score matching (43.5% vs 42.9% [P = .975]; 49.4% vs 41.9% [P = .162]). The complete pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was significantly superior to that of chemotherapy alone (27.7% vs 2.0%; P < .001), and no significant difference in postoperative morbidity was observed in neoadjuvant therapy with or without immunotherapy. The neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group also obtained a survival benefit with a 3-year overall survival (79.8% vs 67.5%; P = .001) and a 3-year event-free survival (63.3% vs 41.2%; P = .004).
Conclusions: After neoadjuvant therapy with immunotherapy, pneumonectomy can be safely performed in selected patients without increased postoperative morbidity.
期刊介绍:
The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features:
• Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques
• New Technology articles
• Case reports
• "How-to-do-it" features
• Reviews of current literature
• Supplements on symposia
• Commentary pieces and correspondence
• CME
• Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery.
An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.