日间宫腔镜检查中单次静脉输注阿芬太尼或舒芬太尼联合靶控输注异丙酚的比较:随机临床试验。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986241292231
Xiaofeng Lei, Tinghuan Zhang, Xuezhu Huang
{"title":"日间宫腔镜检查中单次静脉输注阿芬太尼或舒芬太尼联合靶控输注异丙酚的比较:随机临床试验。","authors":"Xiaofeng Lei, Tinghuan Zhang, Xuezhu Huang","doi":"10.1177/20420986241292231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The administration of either alfentanil or sufentanil as a single injection, combined with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, represents a frequently employed anesthetic regimen for daytime hysteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of alfentanil and sufentanil in the context of daytime hysteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A total of 160 patients, scheduled for daytime hysteroscopy, were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A and Group S respectively received alfentanil 10 μg/kg or sufentanil 0.15 μg/kg as a single intravenous injection. Both groups were given propofol with TCI for sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monitoring of vital signs was conducted from pre-anesthesia through to 2 h postoperatively. The primary outcome measured was hypoxemia, defined as SpO<sub>2</sub> levels below 92% for a duration of 30 s, which necessitated manual positive pressure ventilation. Secondary outcomes included various perioperative complications, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurring 2 h after surgery, as well as hemodynamic indicators, NRS scores for pain, and other anesthesia-related data. This comprehensive dataset was meticulously documented and subsequently analyzed for comparative purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses revealed that Group A had a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and PONV (<i>p</i> = 0.021). Additionally, group A demonstrated overall more stable blood pressure and heart rate, as well as higher SpO<sub>2</sub> levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For daytime hysteroscopy, alfentanil at a dose of 10 μg/kg is safer than sufentanil at a dose of 0.15 μg/kg when combined with propofol TCI.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (The URL of registration is https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177784; registration number: ChiCTR2200063939). The date of first registration was September 21, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"15 ","pages":"20420986241292231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofeng Lei, Tinghuan Zhang, Xuezhu Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420986241292231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The administration of either alfentanil or sufentanil as a single injection, combined with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, represents a frequently employed anesthetic regimen for daytime hysteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of alfentanil and sufentanil in the context of daytime hysteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A total of 160 patients, scheduled for daytime hysteroscopy, were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A and Group S respectively received alfentanil 10 μg/kg or sufentanil 0.15 μg/kg as a single intravenous injection. Both groups were given propofol with TCI for sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monitoring of vital signs was conducted from pre-anesthesia through to 2 h postoperatively. The primary outcome measured was hypoxemia, defined as SpO<sub>2</sub> levels below 92% for a duration of 30 s, which necessitated manual positive pressure ventilation. Secondary outcomes included various perioperative complications, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurring 2 h after surgery, as well as hemodynamic indicators, NRS scores for pain, and other anesthesia-related data. This comprehensive dataset was meticulously documented and subsequently analyzed for comparative purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses revealed that Group A had a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and PONV (<i>p</i> = 0.021). Additionally, group A demonstrated overall more stable blood pressure and heart rate, as well as higher SpO<sub>2</sub> levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For daytime hysteroscopy, alfentanil at a dose of 10 μg/kg is safer than sufentanil at a dose of 0.15 μg/kg when combined with propofol TCI.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (The URL of registration is https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177784; registration number: ChiCTR2200063939). The date of first registration was September 21, 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"20420986241292231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241292231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241292231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿芬太尼或舒芬太尼单次注射,结合异丙酚靶控输注(TCI),是日间宫腔镜检查中常用的麻醉方案:本研究旨在评估和比较阿芬太尼和舒芬太尼在日间宫腔镜检查中的安全性和有效性:设计:将计划在日间进行宫腔镜检查的 160 名患者随机分为两组:A 组和 S 组分别接受阿芬太尼 10 μg/kg 或舒芬太尼 0.15 μg/kg 单次静脉注射。两组均给予异丙酚TCI镇静:方法:从麻醉前到术后 2 小时对生命体征进行监测。测量的主要结果是低氧血症,即SpO2水平低于92%,持续时间为30秒,需要手动正压通气。次要结果包括各种围手术期并发症,如术后 2 小时出现的恶心和呕吐 (PONV),以及血液动力学指标、疼痛 NRS 评分和其他麻醉相关数据。这一全面的数据集得到了细致的记录,随后进行了比较分析:分析结果显示,A 组的低氧血症(p = 0.002)和 PONV(p = 0.021)发生率明显较低。此外,A 组的血压和心率总体更稳定,SpO2 水平更高:结论:对于日间宫腔镜检查,10 μg/kg剂量的阿芬太尼比0.15 μg/kg剂量的舒芬太尼与丙泊酚TCI联用更安全:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册网址:https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177784;注册号:ChiCTR2200063939):ChiCTR2200063939)。首次注册日期为2022年9月21日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: The administration of either alfentanil or sufentanil as a single injection, combined with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, represents a frequently employed anesthetic regimen for daytime hysteroscopy.

Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of alfentanil and sufentanil in the context of daytime hysteroscopy.

Design: A total of 160 patients, scheduled for daytime hysteroscopy, were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A and Group S respectively received alfentanil 10 μg/kg or sufentanil 0.15 μg/kg as a single intravenous injection. Both groups were given propofol with TCI for sedation.

Methods: Monitoring of vital signs was conducted from pre-anesthesia through to 2 h postoperatively. The primary outcome measured was hypoxemia, defined as SpO2 levels below 92% for a duration of 30 s, which necessitated manual positive pressure ventilation. Secondary outcomes included various perioperative complications, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurring 2 h after surgery, as well as hemodynamic indicators, NRS scores for pain, and other anesthesia-related data. This comprehensive dataset was meticulously documented and subsequently analyzed for comparative purposes.

Results: The analyses revealed that Group A had a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia (p = 0.002) and PONV (p = 0.021). Additionally, group A demonstrated overall more stable blood pressure and heart rate, as well as higher SpO2 levels.

Conclusion: For daytime hysteroscopy, alfentanil at a dose of 10 μg/kg is safer than sufentanil at a dose of 0.15 μg/kg when combined with propofol TCI.

Trial registration: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (The URL of registration is https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177784; registration number: ChiCTR2200063939). The date of first registration was September 21, 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信