Todd D Becker, Cindy L Cain, John G Cagle, Joan K Davitt, Nancy Kusmaul, Paul Sacco
{"title":"美国跨学科临终关怀临床医生的全国抽样调查:对理由的内容分析,他们是否愿意在病人死亡的整个过程中,通过医疗协助进行临终关怀。","authors":"Todd D Becker, Cindy L Cain, John G Cagle, Joan K Davitt, Nancy Kusmaul, Paul Sacco","doi":"10.1177/26323524241288881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although medical aid in dying (MAID) legalization continues to expand across the United States, limited research has elucidated attitudes toward its clinical provision, especially in terms of clinician presence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the current study was to explore attitudes toward presence throughout a patient's death via MAID in hospice physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains. Aims included (1) characterizing willingness to be present throughout patient death via MAID and (2) describing rationales for willingness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We employed a cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national convenience sample of interdisciplinary hospice clinicians in the United States (<i>N</i> = 413) completed a self-administered, mixed-method survey via Qualtrics. A quantitative item assessing participants' willingness (no, unsure, yes) to be present throughout a patient's death via MAID preceded a qualitative probe inquiring about their rationales behind their previous response. Quantitative responses were characterized through frequencies and percentages. Qualitative responses within each resulting quantitative subsample were content analyzed for surface-level meaning using inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who were willing to be present (<i>n</i> = 305 [74%]) attributed their willingness to personal support, definitions of quality clinical care, and values from their professional training. Some engaged in boundary setting, describing particular conditions under which they would be willing to be present. Those who were unwilling (<i>n</i> = 63 [15%]) noted personal objections to the concept of MAID, personal objections to MAID participation, and perceptions of MAID's misalignment with healthcare. Those who were unsure (<i>n</i> = 45 [11%]) premised their responses on ambivalence and a lack of experience, both of which precluded formulating a definitive position.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although three-quarters of participants were willing to be present during MAID, qualitative responses revealed great nuance within and across quantitative subsamples. Hospice clinicians would benefit from greater professional guidance and support pertaining to MAID.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to be present throughout patient death via medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: a content analysis of rationales.\",\"authors\":\"Todd D Becker, Cindy L Cain, John G Cagle, Joan K Davitt, Nancy Kusmaul, Paul Sacco\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524241288881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although medical aid in dying (MAID) legalization continues to expand across the United States, limited research has elucidated attitudes toward its clinical provision, especially in terms of clinician presence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the current study was to explore attitudes toward presence throughout a patient's death via MAID in hospice physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains. Aims included (1) characterizing willingness to be present throughout patient death via MAID and (2) describing rationales for willingness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We employed a cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national convenience sample of interdisciplinary hospice clinicians in the United States (<i>N</i> = 413) completed a self-administered, mixed-method survey via Qualtrics. A quantitative item assessing participants' willingness (no, unsure, yes) to be present throughout a patient's death via MAID preceded a qualitative probe inquiring about their rationales behind their previous response. Quantitative responses were characterized through frequencies and percentages. Qualitative responses within each resulting quantitative subsample were content analyzed for surface-level meaning using inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who were willing to be present (<i>n</i> = 305 [74%]) attributed their willingness to personal support, definitions of quality clinical care, and values from their professional training. Some engaged in boundary setting, describing particular conditions under which they would be willing to be present. Those who were unwilling (<i>n</i> = 63 [15%]) noted personal objections to the concept of MAID, personal objections to MAID participation, and perceptions of MAID's misalignment with healthcare. Those who were unsure (<i>n</i> = 45 [11%]) premised their responses on ambivalence and a lack of experience, both of which precluded formulating a definitive position.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although three-quarters of participants were willing to be present during MAID, qualitative responses revealed great nuance within and across quantitative subsamples. Hospice clinicians would benefit from greater professional guidance and support pertaining to MAID.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241288881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241288881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Willingness to be present throughout patient death via medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: a content analysis of rationales.
Background: Although medical aid in dying (MAID) legalization continues to expand across the United States, limited research has elucidated attitudes toward its clinical provision, especially in terms of clinician presence.
Objective: The objective of the current study was to explore attitudes toward presence throughout a patient's death via MAID in hospice physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains. Aims included (1) characterizing willingness to be present throughout patient death via MAID and (2) describing rationales for willingness.
Design: We employed a cross-sectional design.
Methods: A national convenience sample of interdisciplinary hospice clinicians in the United States (N = 413) completed a self-administered, mixed-method survey via Qualtrics. A quantitative item assessing participants' willingness (no, unsure, yes) to be present throughout a patient's death via MAID preceded a qualitative probe inquiring about their rationales behind their previous response. Quantitative responses were characterized through frequencies and percentages. Qualitative responses within each resulting quantitative subsample were content analyzed for surface-level meaning using inductive coding.
Results: Participants who were willing to be present (n = 305 [74%]) attributed their willingness to personal support, definitions of quality clinical care, and values from their professional training. Some engaged in boundary setting, describing particular conditions under which they would be willing to be present. Those who were unwilling (n = 63 [15%]) noted personal objections to the concept of MAID, personal objections to MAID participation, and perceptions of MAID's misalignment with healthcare. Those who were unsure (n = 45 [11%]) premised their responses on ambivalence and a lack of experience, both of which precluded formulating a definitive position.
Conclusion: Although three-quarters of participants were willing to be present during MAID, qualitative responses revealed great nuance within and across quantitative subsamples. Hospice clinicians would benefit from greater professional guidance and support pertaining to MAID.