没有证据表明令人担忧的 SARS-CoV-2 变体中的突变来自肠道微生物群中的同源片段。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Journal of Virology Pub Date : 2024-12-17 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1128/jvi.01468-24
Rhys H Parry, Spyros Lytras, Mary E Petrone, Michelle Wille, Alexander Crits-Christoph, Robert J Gifford, Akatsuki Saito, Teemu Smura, Thomas P Peacock
{"title":"没有证据表明令人担忧的 SARS-CoV-2 变体中的突变来自肠道微生物群中的同源片段。","authors":"Rhys H Parry, Spyros Lytras, Mary E Petrone, Michelle Wille, Alexander Crits-Christoph, Robert J Gifford, Akatsuki Saito, Teemu Smura, Thomas P Peacock","doi":"10.1128/jvi.01468-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the origin and evolution of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) is a critical area of research. B. Cao, X. Wang, W. Yin, Z. Gao, and B. Xia (mBio 15:e03187-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03187-23) proposed that these mutations originated from bacterial sequences incorporated into the viral genome through stochastic template-switching by the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Their analysis suggested that 62% of the viral mutation fragments (VMFs) in key SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identical to bacterial protein sequences. Given the implications of this finding, we re-examined the methods employed and argue that they resulted in false-positive findings. Specifically, the short query length of VMFs, seven amino acids, leads to spurious matches in large protein databases, as indicated by high BLAST Expect values. Furthermore, we analyzed the nucleotide sequence of VMFs, revealing no unique homology between SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial sequences. Consequently, the evidence does not support the hypothesis that bacterial sequences contribute to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. Instead, the emergence of these variants is more plausibly attributed to factors intrinsic to viral replication and evolution, such as the error-prone nature of RdRp, intrahost diversity, and recombination of related viral sublineages.</p>","PeriodicalId":17583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Virology","volume":" ","pages":"e0146824"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No evidence that mutations in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern derive from homologous fragments in gut microbiota.\",\"authors\":\"Rhys H Parry, Spyros Lytras, Mary E Petrone, Michelle Wille, Alexander Crits-Christoph, Robert J Gifford, Akatsuki Saito, Teemu Smura, Thomas P Peacock\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jvi.01468-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the origin and evolution of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) is a critical area of research. B. Cao, X. Wang, W. Yin, Z. Gao, and B. Xia (mBio 15:e03187-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03187-23) proposed that these mutations originated from bacterial sequences incorporated into the viral genome through stochastic template-switching by the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Their analysis suggested that 62% of the viral mutation fragments (VMFs) in key SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identical to bacterial protein sequences. Given the implications of this finding, we re-examined the methods employed and argue that they resulted in false-positive findings. Specifically, the short query length of VMFs, seven amino acids, leads to spurious matches in large protein databases, as indicated by high BLAST Expect values. Furthermore, we analyzed the nucleotide sequence of VMFs, revealing no unique homology between SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial sequences. Consequently, the evidence does not support the hypothesis that bacterial sequences contribute to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. Instead, the emergence of these variants is more plausibly attributed to factors intrinsic to viral replication and evolution, such as the error-prone nature of RdRp, intrahost diversity, and recombination of related viral sublineages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Virology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0146824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01468-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01468-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解 SARS-CoV-2 变异体(VOCs)突变的起源和进化是一个关键的研究领域。B. Cao、X. Wang、W. Yin、Z. Gao 和 B. Xia(mBio 15:e03187-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03187-23)提出,这些变异源于细菌序列通过病毒 RNA 依赖性 RNA 聚合酶(RdRp)的随机模板切换结合到病毒基因组中。他们的分析表明,SARS-CoV-2 关键蛋白中有 62% 的病毒突变片段 (VMF) 与细菌蛋白序列相同。考虑到这一发现的影响,我们重新审查了所采用的方法,认为这些方法导致了假阳性发现。具体来说,VMF 的查询长度很短,只有 7 个氨基酸,这导致在大型蛋白质数据库中出现假匹配,BLAST Expect 值很高就说明了这一点。此外,我们分析了 VMFs 的核苷酸序列,发现 SARS-CoV-2 与细菌序列之间没有独特的同源性。因此,这些证据并不支持细菌序列促成了 SARS-CoV-2 VOCs 进化的假设。相反,这些变体的出现更有可能归因于病毒复制和进化的内在因素,如 RdRp 的易错性、宿主内部的多样性以及相关病毒亚系的重组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No evidence that mutations in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern derive from homologous fragments in gut microbiota.

Understanding the origin and evolution of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) is a critical area of research. B. Cao, X. Wang, W. Yin, Z. Gao, and B. Xia (mBio 15:e03187-23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03187-23) proposed that these mutations originated from bacterial sequences incorporated into the viral genome through stochastic template-switching by the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Their analysis suggested that 62% of the viral mutation fragments (VMFs) in key SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identical to bacterial protein sequences. Given the implications of this finding, we re-examined the methods employed and argue that they resulted in false-positive findings. Specifically, the short query length of VMFs, seven amino acids, leads to spurious matches in large protein databases, as indicated by high BLAST Expect values. Furthermore, we analyzed the nucleotide sequence of VMFs, revealing no unique homology between SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial sequences. Consequently, the evidence does not support the hypothesis that bacterial sequences contribute to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. Instead, the emergence of these variants is more plausibly attributed to factors intrinsic to viral replication and evolution, such as the error-prone nature of RdRp, intrahost diversity, and recombination of related viral sublineages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Virology
Journal of Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Virology (JVI) explores the nature of the viruses of animals, archaea, bacteria, fungi, plants, and protozoa. We welcome papers on virion structure and assembly, viral genome replication and regulation of gene expression, genetic diversity and evolution, virus-cell interactions, cellular responses to infection, transformation and oncogenesis, gene delivery, viral pathogenesis and immunity, and vaccines and antiviral agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信