Alessandra Gentile, Yosua Yan Kristian, Erica Cini
{"title":"基于计算机的饮食失调心理教育自助平台(有无相关应用程序)的有效性:系统回顾协议》。","authors":"Alessandra Gentile, Yosua Yan Kristian, Erica Cini","doi":"10.2196/60165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to psychological health care is extremely difficult, especially for individuals with severely stigmatized disorders such as eating disorders (EDs). There has been an increase in children, adolescents, and adults with ED symptoms and ED, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Computer-based self-help platforms (± associated apps) allow people to bridge the treatment gap and receive support when in-person treatment is unavailable or not preferred.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of computer-based self-help platforms for EDs, some of which may have associated apps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed systematic review will follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. This review will report and evaluate the literature concerning the efficacy of self-help platforms for EDs. Articles were obtained from the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and APA PsycInfo. The inclusion criteria included research with original data and gray literature; research evaluating the efficacy of web-based psychoeducational self-help platforms for EDs; people with an ED diagnosis, ED symptoms, at risk of developing EDs, or from the general population without ED-related behaviors; pre- and post-computer-based ± associated apps intervention clinical outcome of ED symptoms; pre- and post-computer-based ± associated apps intervention associated mental health difficulties; and literature in English. The exclusion criteria were solely guided self-help platforms, only in-person interventions with no computer-based ± associated apps comparison group, only in-person-delivered CBT, self-help platforms for conditions other than eating disorders, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, posters, leaflets, books, reviews, and research that only reported physical outcomes. Two independent authors used the search terms to conduct the initial search. The collated articles then were screened by their titles and abstracts, and finally, full-text screenings were conducted. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool will be used to assess the risks of bias in the included studies. Data extraction will be conducted, included studies will undergo narrative synthesis, and results will be presented in tables. The systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors conducted a database search for articles published by May 31, 2024. In total, 14 studies were included in the systematic review. Data charting, synthesis, and analysis were completed in Microsoft Excel by the end of July 2024. Results will be grouped based on the intervention stages. The results are expected to be published by the end of 2024. Overall, the systematic review found that computer-based self-help platforms are effective in reducing global ED psychopathology and ED-related behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-help platforms are helpful first-stage resource in a tiered health care system.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024520866; https://tinyurl.com/5ys2unsw.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/60165.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Computer-Based Psychoeducational Self-Help Platforms for Eating Disorders (With or Without an Associated App): Protocol for a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Gentile, Yosua Yan Kristian, Erica Cini\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/60165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to psychological health care is extremely difficult, especially for individuals with severely stigmatized disorders such as eating disorders (EDs). There has been an increase in children, adolescents, and adults with ED symptoms and ED, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Computer-based self-help platforms (± associated apps) allow people to bridge the treatment gap and receive support when in-person treatment is unavailable or not preferred.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of computer-based self-help platforms for EDs, some of which may have associated apps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed systematic review will follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. This review will report and evaluate the literature concerning the efficacy of self-help platforms for EDs. Articles were obtained from the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and APA PsycInfo. The inclusion criteria included research with original data and gray literature; research evaluating the efficacy of web-based psychoeducational self-help platforms for EDs; people with an ED diagnosis, ED symptoms, at risk of developing EDs, or from the general population without ED-related behaviors; pre- and post-computer-based ± associated apps intervention clinical outcome of ED symptoms; pre- and post-computer-based ± associated apps intervention associated mental health difficulties; and literature in English. The exclusion criteria were solely guided self-help platforms, only in-person interventions with no computer-based ± associated apps comparison group, only in-person-delivered CBT, self-help platforms for conditions other than eating disorders, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, posters, leaflets, books, reviews, and research that only reported physical outcomes. Two independent authors used the search terms to conduct the initial search. The collated articles then were screened by their titles and abstracts, and finally, full-text screenings were conducted. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool will be used to assess the risks of bias in the included studies. Data extraction will be conducted, included studies will undergo narrative synthesis, and results will be presented in tables. The systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors conducted a database search for articles published by May 31, 2024. In total, 14 studies were included in the systematic review. Data charting, synthesis, and analysis were completed in Microsoft Excel by the end of July 2024. Results will be grouped based on the intervention stages. The results are expected to be published by the end of 2024. Overall, the systematic review found that computer-based self-help platforms are effective in reducing global ED psychopathology and ED-related behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-help platforms are helpful first-stage resource in a tiered health care system.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024520866; https://tinyurl.com/5ys2unsw.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/60165.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/60165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:获得心理保健服务极其困难,尤其是对于患有饮食失调症(ED)等严重污名化疾病的患者而言。尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行之后,有 ED 症状和 ED 的儿童、青少年和成年人越来越多。基于计算机的自助平台(± 相关应用程序)使人们能够弥合治疗差距,并在无法或不愿意接受面对面治疗时获得支持:本系统综述旨在评估基于计算机的 ED 自助平台的有效性,其中一些平台可能有相关应用程序:拟议的系统性综述将遵循 PRISMA(系统性综述和元分析首选报告项目)指南。本综述将报告和评估有关 ED 自助平台功效的文献。文章来自 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、Global Health 和 APA PsycInfo。纳入标准包括:原始数据和灰色文献研究;评估基于网络的心理教育自助平台对 ED 的疗效的研究;ED 诊断、ED 症状、ED 高危人群或无 ED 相关行为的普通人群;基于计算机的±相关应用程序干预前后的 ED 症状临床结果;基于计算机的±相关应用程序干预前后的心理健康困难;英文文献。排除标准包括:仅有指导性自助平台、仅有本人干预且无基于计算机的±相关应用程序对比组、仅有本人提供的CBT、针对饮食失调以外情况的自助平台、系统综述、荟萃分析、海报、传单、书籍、评论以及仅报告身体结果的研究。两位独立作者使用检索词进行了初步检索。然后根据标题和摘要对整理后的文章进行筛选,最后进行全文筛选。将使用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。将进行数据提取,对纳入的研究进行叙述性综合,并以表格形式呈现结果。系统综述将提交给同行评审期刊:作者在数据库中搜索了 2024 年 5 月 31 日前发表的文章。共有 14 项研究被纳入系统综述。在 2024 年 7 月底之前,用 Microsoft Excel 完成了数据图表、综合和分析。研究结果将根据干预阶段进行分组。研究结果预计将于 2024 年底公布。总体而言,系统性综述发现,基于计算机的自助平台可有效减少整体性 ED 精神病理学和 ED 相关行为:自助平台是分级医疗系统中有用的第一阶段资源:PROSPERO CRD42024520866; https://tinyurl.com/5ys2unsw.International 注册报告标识符 (irrid):DERR1-10.2196/60165。
Effectiveness of Computer-Based Psychoeducational Self-Help Platforms for Eating Disorders (With or Without an Associated App): Protocol for a Systematic Review.
Background: Access to psychological health care is extremely difficult, especially for individuals with severely stigmatized disorders such as eating disorders (EDs). There has been an increase in children, adolescents, and adults with ED symptoms and ED, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Computer-based self-help platforms (± associated apps) allow people to bridge the treatment gap and receive support when in-person treatment is unavailable or not preferred.
Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of computer-based self-help platforms for EDs, some of which may have associated apps.
Methods: The proposed systematic review will follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. This review will report and evaluate the literature concerning the efficacy of self-help platforms for EDs. Articles were obtained from the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and APA PsycInfo. The inclusion criteria included research with original data and gray literature; research evaluating the efficacy of web-based psychoeducational self-help platforms for EDs; people with an ED diagnosis, ED symptoms, at risk of developing EDs, or from the general population without ED-related behaviors; pre- and post-computer-based ± associated apps intervention clinical outcome of ED symptoms; pre- and post-computer-based ± associated apps intervention associated mental health difficulties; and literature in English. The exclusion criteria were solely guided self-help platforms, only in-person interventions with no computer-based ± associated apps comparison group, only in-person-delivered CBT, self-help platforms for conditions other than eating disorders, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, posters, leaflets, books, reviews, and research that only reported physical outcomes. Two independent authors used the search terms to conduct the initial search. The collated articles then were screened by their titles and abstracts, and finally, full-text screenings were conducted. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool will be used to assess the risks of bias in the included studies. Data extraction will be conducted, included studies will undergo narrative synthesis, and results will be presented in tables. The systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.
Results: The authors conducted a database search for articles published by May 31, 2024. In total, 14 studies were included in the systematic review. Data charting, synthesis, and analysis were completed in Microsoft Excel by the end of July 2024. Results will be grouped based on the intervention stages. The results are expected to be published by the end of 2024. Overall, the systematic review found that computer-based self-help platforms are effective in reducing global ED psychopathology and ED-related behaviors.
Conclusions: Self-help platforms are helpful first-stage resource in a tiered health care system.