需要专家批准后的芬太尼启动率。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09160-4
Oren Miron, Yael Wolff-Sagy, Mark Levin, Esti Lubich, Jordan Lewinski, Maya Shpunt, Wiessam Abu Ahmad, Ilya Borochov, Doron Netzer, Gil Lavie
{"title":"需要专家批准后的芬太尼启动率。","authors":"Oren Miron, Yael Wolff-Sagy, Mark Levin, Esti Lubich, Jordan Lewinski, Maya Shpunt, Wiessam Abu Ahmad, Ilya Borochov, Doron Netzer, Gil Lavie","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09160-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare organizations attempt to address unwarranted fentanyl use, which often leads to increased risk of addiction and overdose.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of a requirement for a specialist's approval on fentanyl initiation for non-oncological pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study based on observational data.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All 4.4 million non-oncological members of Clalit Health Services were included, from July 20, 2021, to July 19, 2023.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The rate of fentanyl initiation was assessed before and after the implementation of the requirement for specialist's approval, which was introduced on July 2022, and expanded 6 months later for continued use. A sub-group analysis by age group was performed, and patient characteristics and indications were assessed. We also compared total opioid dispensation in the 6th and 12th months after the implementation with the predicted rate based on pre-implementation rates.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Fentanyl initiation rate in the year before the requirement was 711 per million capita, which decreased following the requirement by - 81% (95% CI: - 77%; - 85%). The decrease attenuated with age. The prevalence of diagnosis with substance abuse disorders at the time of fentanyl initiation decreased from 6 to 3%. In the 6th and 12th months after the requirement was implemented, the morphine milligram equivalent (MME) from dispensation of total opioids was lower than predicted based on pre-implementation rates by 7% and 26%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Requiring specialist approval for fentanyl initiation for non-oncological chronic pain was associated with a decrease in fentanyl prescription initiations, especially among non-elderly patients. A decrease also occurred gradually in total opioid dispensations, further decreasing following the extension of the requirement to continuous fentanyl. The requirement for specialist approval upon fentanyl initiation and continuous fentanyl may present an effective tool for limiting the use of fentanyl and total opioids in healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3097-3103"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fentanyl Initiation Rate Following the Requirement for Specialist Approval.\",\"authors\":\"Oren Miron, Yael Wolff-Sagy, Mark Levin, Esti Lubich, Jordan Lewinski, Maya Shpunt, Wiessam Abu Ahmad, Ilya Borochov, Doron Netzer, Gil Lavie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09160-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare organizations attempt to address unwarranted fentanyl use, which often leads to increased risk of addiction and overdose.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of a requirement for a specialist's approval on fentanyl initiation for non-oncological pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study based on observational data.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All 4.4 million non-oncological members of Clalit Health Services were included, from July 20, 2021, to July 19, 2023.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The rate of fentanyl initiation was assessed before and after the implementation of the requirement for specialist's approval, which was introduced on July 2022, and expanded 6 months later for continued use. A sub-group analysis by age group was performed, and patient characteristics and indications were assessed. We also compared total opioid dispensation in the 6th and 12th months after the implementation with the predicted rate based on pre-implementation rates.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Fentanyl initiation rate in the year before the requirement was 711 per million capita, which decreased following the requirement by - 81% (95% CI: - 77%; - 85%). The decrease attenuated with age. The prevalence of diagnosis with substance abuse disorders at the time of fentanyl initiation decreased from 6 to 3%. In the 6th and 12th months after the requirement was implemented, the morphine milligram equivalent (MME) from dispensation of total opioids was lower than predicted based on pre-implementation rates by 7% and 26%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Requiring specialist approval for fentanyl initiation for non-oncological chronic pain was associated with a decrease in fentanyl prescription initiations, especially among non-elderly patients. A decrease also occurred gradually in total opioid dispensations, further decreasing following the extension of the requirement to continuous fentanyl. The requirement for specialist approval upon fentanyl initiation and continuous fentanyl may present an effective tool for limiting the use of fentanyl and total opioids in healthcare systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3097-3103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09160-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09160-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗机构试图解决不合理使用芬太尼的问题,因为这通常会导致成瘾和用药过量的风险增加:评估非肿瘤性疼痛患者开始使用芬太尼时需要专科医生批准的影响:设计:基于观察数据的回顾性队列研究:主要测量指标:主要测量指标:评估了2022年7月开始实施的专家批准要求实施前后的芬太尼使用率,6个月后扩大到继续使用。我们按年龄组进行了分组分析,并对患者特征和适应症进行了评估。我们还将实施后第 6 个月和第 12 个月的阿片类药物总配药量与根据实施前配药量预测的配药量进行了比较:主要结果:要求实施前一年的芬太尼使用率为人均 711 次,要求实施后下降了 - 81% (95% CI: - 77%; - 85%)。随着年龄的增长,下降幅度有所减小。在开始使用芬太尼时,药物滥用症的诊断率从 6% 降至 3%。在该要求实施后的第6个月和第12个月,阿片类药物的总吗啡毫克当量(MME)分别比实施前的预测值低7%和26%:非肿瘤性慢性疼痛患者在开始使用芬太尼时需要获得专科医生的批准,这与芬太尼处方使用量的减少有关,尤其是在非老年患者中。阿片类药物的总处方量也逐渐减少,在将这一要求扩大到持续使用芬太尼后,阿片类药物的总处方量进一步减少。在开始使用芬太尼和连续使用芬太尼时需要获得专家批准的要求可能是限制医疗系统使用芬太尼和全部阿片类药物的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fentanyl Initiation Rate Following the Requirement for Specialist Approval.

Background: Healthcare organizations attempt to address unwarranted fentanyl use, which often leads to increased risk of addiction and overdose.

Objective: To assess the impact of a requirement for a specialist's approval on fentanyl initiation for non-oncological pain.

Design: A retrospective cohort study based on observational data.

Participants: All 4.4 million non-oncological members of Clalit Health Services were included, from July 20, 2021, to July 19, 2023.

Main measures: The rate of fentanyl initiation was assessed before and after the implementation of the requirement for specialist's approval, which was introduced on July 2022, and expanded 6 months later for continued use. A sub-group analysis by age group was performed, and patient characteristics and indications were assessed. We also compared total opioid dispensation in the 6th and 12th months after the implementation with the predicted rate based on pre-implementation rates.

Key results: Fentanyl initiation rate in the year before the requirement was 711 per million capita, which decreased following the requirement by - 81% (95% CI: - 77%; - 85%). The decrease attenuated with age. The prevalence of diagnosis with substance abuse disorders at the time of fentanyl initiation decreased from 6 to 3%. In the 6th and 12th months after the requirement was implemented, the morphine milligram equivalent (MME) from dispensation of total opioids was lower than predicted based on pre-implementation rates by 7% and 26%, respectively.

Conclusions: Requiring specialist approval for fentanyl initiation for non-oncological chronic pain was associated with a decrease in fentanyl prescription initiations, especially among non-elderly patients. A decrease also occurred gradually in total opioid dispensations, further decreasing following the extension of the requirement to continuous fentanyl. The requirement for specialist approval upon fentanyl initiation and continuous fentanyl may present an effective tool for limiting the use of fentanyl and total opioids in healthcare systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信