儿科和成人尿路感染的预防、诊断和管理指南:维基指南小组共识声明》。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Zachary Nelson, Abdullah Tarik Aslan, Nathan P Beahm, Michelle Blyth, Matthew Cappiello, Danielle Casaus, Fernando Dominguez, Susan Egbert, Alexandra Hanretty, Tina Khadem, Katie Olney, Ahmed Abdul-Azim, Gloria Aggrey, Daniel T Anderson, Mariana Barosa, Michael Bosco, Elias B Chahine, Souradeep Chowdhury, Alyssa Christensen, Daniela de Lima Corvino, Margaret Fitzpatrick, Molly Fleece, Brent Footer, Emily Fox, Bassam Ghanem, Fergus Hamilton, Justin Hayes, Boris Jegorovic, Philipp Jent, Rodolfo Norberto Jimenez-Juarez, Annie Joseph, Minji Kang, Geena Kludjian, Sarah Kurz, Rachael A Lee, Todd C Lee, Timothy Li, Alberto Enrico Maraolo, Mira Maximos, Emily G McDonald, Dhara Mehta, Justin William Moore, Cynthia T Nguyen, Cihan Papan, Akshatha Ravindra, Brad Spellberg, Robert Taylor, Alexis Thumann, Steven Y C Tong, Michael Veve, James Wilson, Arsheena Yassin, Veronica Zafonte, Alfredo J Mena Lora
{"title":"儿科和成人尿路感染的预防、诊断和管理指南:维基指南小组共识声明》。","authors":"Zachary Nelson, Abdullah Tarik Aslan, Nathan P Beahm, Michelle Blyth, Matthew Cappiello, Danielle Casaus, Fernando Dominguez, Susan Egbert, Alexandra Hanretty, Tina Khadem, Katie Olney, Ahmed Abdul-Azim, Gloria Aggrey, Daniel T Anderson, Mariana Barosa, Michael Bosco, Elias B Chahine, Souradeep Chowdhury, Alyssa Christensen, Daniela de Lima Corvino, Margaret Fitzpatrick, Molly Fleece, Brent Footer, Emily Fox, Bassam Ghanem, Fergus Hamilton, Justin Hayes, Boris Jegorovic, Philipp Jent, Rodolfo Norberto Jimenez-Juarez, Annie Joseph, Minji Kang, Geena Kludjian, Sarah Kurz, Rachael A Lee, Todd C Lee, Timothy Li, Alberto Enrico Maraolo, Mira Maximos, Emily G McDonald, Dhara Mehta, Justin William Moore, Cynthia T Nguyen, Cihan Papan, Akshatha Ravindra, Brad Spellberg, Robert Taylor, Alexis Thumann, Steven Y C Tong, Michael Veve, James Wilson, Arsheena Yassin, Veronica Zafonte, Alfredo J Mena Lora","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Traditional approaches to practice guidelines frequently result in dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In May 2023, new and existing members were solicited for questions on urinary tract infection prevention, diagnosis, and management. For each topic, literature searches were conducted up until early 2024 in any language. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were developed discussing the available literature and associated risks and benefits of various approaches.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 54 members representing 12 countries reviewed 914 articles and submitted information relevant to 5 sections: prophylaxis and prevention (7 questions), diagnosis and diagnostic stewardship (7 questions), empirical treatment (3 questions), definitive treatment and antimicrobial stewardship (10 questions), and special populations and genitourinary syndromes (10 questions). Of 37 unique questions, a clear recommendation could be provided for 6 questions. In 3 of the remaining questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for certain aspects of the question. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions and aspects of questions not meeting criteria for a clear recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuidelines method for clinical guideline development, the majority of topics relating to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of urinary tract infections lack high-quality prospective data and clear recommendations could not be made. Randomized clinical trials are underway to address some of these gaps; however further research is of utmost importance to inform true evidence-based, rather than eminence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2444495"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Pediatrics and Adults: A WikiGuidelines Group Consensus Statement.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Nelson, Abdullah Tarik Aslan, Nathan P Beahm, Michelle Blyth, Matthew Cappiello, Danielle Casaus, Fernando Dominguez, Susan Egbert, Alexandra Hanretty, Tina Khadem, Katie Olney, Ahmed Abdul-Azim, Gloria Aggrey, Daniel T Anderson, Mariana Barosa, Michael Bosco, Elias B Chahine, Souradeep Chowdhury, Alyssa Christensen, Daniela de Lima Corvino, Margaret Fitzpatrick, Molly Fleece, Brent Footer, Emily Fox, Bassam Ghanem, Fergus Hamilton, Justin Hayes, Boris Jegorovic, Philipp Jent, Rodolfo Norberto Jimenez-Juarez, Annie Joseph, Minji Kang, Geena Kludjian, Sarah Kurz, Rachael A Lee, Todd C Lee, Timothy Li, Alberto Enrico Maraolo, Mira Maximos, Emily G McDonald, Dhara Mehta, Justin William Moore, Cynthia T Nguyen, Cihan Papan, Akshatha Ravindra, Brad Spellberg, Robert Taylor, Alexis Thumann, Steven Y C Tong, Michael Veve, James Wilson, Arsheena Yassin, Veronica Zafonte, Alfredo J Mena Lora\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Traditional approaches to practice guidelines frequently result in dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In May 2023, new and existing members were solicited for questions on urinary tract infection prevention, diagnosis, and management. For each topic, literature searches were conducted up until early 2024 in any language. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were developed discussing the available literature and associated risks and benefits of various approaches.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 54 members representing 12 countries reviewed 914 articles and submitted information relevant to 5 sections: prophylaxis and prevention (7 questions), diagnosis and diagnostic stewardship (7 questions), empirical treatment (3 questions), definitive treatment and antimicrobial stewardship (10 questions), and special populations and genitourinary syndromes (10 questions). Of 37 unique questions, a clear recommendation could be provided for 6 questions. In 3 of the remaining questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for certain aspects of the question. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions and aspects of questions not meeting criteria for a clear recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuidelines method for clinical guideline development, the majority of topics relating to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of urinary tract infections lack high-quality prospective data and clear recommendations could not be made. Randomized clinical trials are underway to address some of these gaps; however further research is of utmost importance to inform true evidence-based, rather than eminence-based practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"7 11\",\"pages\":\"e2444495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44495\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44495","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:传统的实践指南常常导致推荐强度与证据质量之间的脱节:为尿路感染的诊断和管理制定临床指南,解决证据与推荐强度之间的差距:本共识声明和系统性回顾采用了 WikiGuidelines 小组之前制定的方法来构建合作性临床指南。2023 年 5 月,WikiGuidelines 小组向新老成员征集了有关尿路感染预防、诊断和管理的问题。针对每个主题,在 2024 年初之前以任何语言进行文献检索。根据 WikiGuidelines 章程对证据进行了报告:只有在可重复、前瞻性、对照研究提供了证实假设的证据时,才会提出明确的建议。在缺乏此类数据的情况下,则编写临床综述,讨论现有文献以及各种方法的相关风险和益处:代表 12 个国家的 54 名成员共审阅了 914 篇文章,并提交了与以下 5 个部分相关的信息:预防和预防(7 个问题)、诊断和诊断管理(7 个问题)、经验性治疗(3 个问题)、确定性治疗和抗菌药物管理(10 个问题)以及特殊人群和泌尿生殖系统综合征(10 个问题)。在 37 个独特的问题中,有 6 个问题可以提供明确的建议。在其余 3 个问题中,只能针对问题的某些方面提出明确的建议。对于其余问题和不符合明确推荐标准的问题的某些方面,我们生成了临床评论:在这份应用 WikiGuidelines 方法制定临床指南的共识声明中,大多数与尿路感染的预防、诊断和治疗相关的主题缺乏高质量的前瞻性数据,因此无法提出明确的建议。随机临床试验正在进行中,以弥补其中的一些不足;然而,进一步的研究对于提供真正的循证实践而非基于权威的实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Pediatrics and Adults: A WikiGuidelines Group Consensus Statement.

Importance: Traditional approaches to practice guidelines frequently result in dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence.

Objective: To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength.

Evidence review: This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In May 2023, new and existing members were solicited for questions on urinary tract infection prevention, diagnosis, and management. For each topic, literature searches were conducted up until early 2024 in any language. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were developed discussing the available literature and associated risks and benefits of various approaches.

Findings: A total of 54 members representing 12 countries reviewed 914 articles and submitted information relevant to 5 sections: prophylaxis and prevention (7 questions), diagnosis and diagnostic stewardship (7 questions), empirical treatment (3 questions), definitive treatment and antimicrobial stewardship (10 questions), and special populations and genitourinary syndromes (10 questions). Of 37 unique questions, a clear recommendation could be provided for 6 questions. In 3 of the remaining questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for certain aspects of the question. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions and aspects of questions not meeting criteria for a clear recommendation.

Conclusions and relevance: In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuidelines method for clinical guideline development, the majority of topics relating to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of urinary tract infections lack high-quality prospective data and clear recommendations could not be made. Randomized clinical trials are underway to address some of these gaps; however further research is of utmost importance to inform true evidence-based, rather than eminence-based practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信