{"title":"妊娠和分娩期间再生障碍性贫血的母体和胎儿结局:系统综述与元分析》。","authors":"Aashima Arora, Arihant Jain, Deepesh Lad, Drishita Ganguly, Pankaj Khatri, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Bijaya Kumar Padhi, Amol N Patil, Pankaj Malhotra, Vanita Jain","doi":"10.1111/ejh.14317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little scientific evidence exists on maternal and fetal outcomes in aplastic anemia (AA) during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The review was conducted to assess the maternal and fetal outcomes due to AA during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and registries until May 5, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies (prospective, retrospective cohort, cross-sectional, one arm, survey, follow-up studies) evaluating AA during pregnancy were searched as per PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42024506668). Case reports, case series, expert opinion letters, and studies assessing less than or equal to 10 pregnant women were not considered. The primary outcome was the prevalence of preeclampsia in AA pregnancies. The secondary outcomes included spontaneous abortion, preterm premature rupture of membranes, premature rupture of membranes, fetal growth restriction, type of delivery, intrauterine fetal death, maternal and neonatal mortality, and pre and post-pregnancy remission status comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The quality of research was checked using the New Castle-Ottawa risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis model with a random effect distribution, coupled with meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment, was used in the statistical software R. Standard Equator network study reporting guidelines were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven (one prospective and six retrospective cohort) studies included patients with confirmed AA diagnosis in 248 pregnancies. The pooled prevalence of preeclampsia was 13% (95% CI, 8%-20%). Heterogeneity was low in the present meta-analysis (I<sup>2</sup> = 26%). The secondary outcome evaluation showed a pooled prevalence of 5% (95% CI, 3%-11%) for spontaneous abortion, 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%) for preterm premature rupture of membranes, 10% (95% CI, 3%-28%) for premature rupture of membranes, 6% (95% CI, 3%-11%) for fetal growth restriction, 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%) for intrauterine fetal death, 12% (95% CI, 5%-26%) for post-partum hemorrhage, 74% (95% CI, 45%-91%) for intrapartum transfusion requirement, and 55% (95% CI, 27%-80%) for the cesarean delivery opting. The maternal mortality in pregnancies with AA was 4% (95% CI, 0.01-0.14), whereas neonatal mortality was 7% (95% CI, 0.03-0.18). The odds of AA complete remission were better in pre-pregnancy than post-pregnancy (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.08-1.66), although the results remain insignificant. The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis did not change the pooled estimates for the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A risk of developing preeclampsia was observed in every eighth pregnant woman with an AA diagnosis. AA remission status might worsen after undergoing pregnancy, considering the significant obstetric morbidity and mortality burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Aplastic Anemia During Pregnancy and Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aashima Arora, Arihant Jain, Deepesh Lad, Drishita Ganguly, Pankaj Khatri, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Bijaya Kumar Padhi, Amol N Patil, Pankaj Malhotra, Vanita Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejh.14317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little scientific evidence exists on maternal and fetal outcomes in aplastic anemia (AA) during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The review was conducted to assess the maternal and fetal outcomes due to AA during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and registries until May 5, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies (prospective, retrospective cohort, cross-sectional, one arm, survey, follow-up studies) evaluating AA during pregnancy were searched as per PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42024506668). Case reports, case series, expert opinion letters, and studies assessing less than or equal to 10 pregnant women were not considered. The primary outcome was the prevalence of preeclampsia in AA pregnancies. The secondary outcomes included spontaneous abortion, preterm premature rupture of membranes, premature rupture of membranes, fetal growth restriction, type of delivery, intrauterine fetal death, maternal and neonatal mortality, and pre and post-pregnancy remission status comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The quality of research was checked using the New Castle-Ottawa risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis model with a random effect distribution, coupled with meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment, was used in the statistical software R. Standard Equator network study reporting guidelines were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven (one prospective and six retrospective cohort) studies included patients with confirmed AA diagnosis in 248 pregnancies. The pooled prevalence of preeclampsia was 13% (95% CI, 8%-20%). Heterogeneity was low in the present meta-analysis (I<sup>2</sup> = 26%). The secondary outcome evaluation showed a pooled prevalence of 5% (95% CI, 3%-11%) for spontaneous abortion, 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%) for preterm premature rupture of membranes, 10% (95% CI, 3%-28%) for premature rupture of membranes, 6% (95% CI, 3%-11%) for fetal growth restriction, 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%) for intrauterine fetal death, 12% (95% CI, 5%-26%) for post-partum hemorrhage, 74% (95% CI, 45%-91%) for intrapartum transfusion requirement, and 55% (95% CI, 27%-80%) for the cesarean delivery opting. The maternal mortality in pregnancies with AA was 4% (95% CI, 0.01-0.14), whereas neonatal mortality was 7% (95% CI, 0.03-0.18). The odds of AA complete remission were better in pre-pregnancy than post-pregnancy (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.08-1.66), although the results remain insignificant. The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis did not change the pooled estimates for the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A risk of developing preeclampsia was observed in every eighth pregnant woman with an AA diagnosis. AA remission status might worsen after undergoing pregnancy, considering the significant obstetric morbidity and mortality burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于妊娠期再生障碍性贫血(AA)的母体和胎儿结局的科学证据很少:目的:本综述旨在评估妊娠期再生障碍性贫血(AA)对母体和胎儿的影响:研究资格标准:按照 PROSPERO 注册协议(CRD42024506668)检索评估孕期 AA 的研究(前瞻性、回顾性队列研究、横断面研究、单臂研究、调查研究、随访研究)。病例报告、系列病例、专家意见书以及对少于或等于 10 名孕妇进行评估的研究不在考虑之列。主要结果是AA孕妇子痫前期的发病率。次要结果包括自然流产、胎膜早破、胎膜早破、胎儿生长受限、分娩类型、胎儿宫内死亡、孕产妇和新生儿死亡率以及孕前和孕后缓解状态比较:采用新堡-渥太华偏倚风险工具检查研究质量。采用随机效应分布的荟萃分析模型,结合荟萃回归、敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估,使用 R 统计软件:七项研究(一项前瞻性研究和六项回顾性队列研究)纳入了 248 例妊娠中确诊为 AA 的患者。汇总的子痫前期发病率为 13%(95% CI,8%-20%)。本荟萃分析的异质性较低(I2 = 26%)。次要结果评估显示,自然流产的总发生率为 5%(95% CI,3%-11%),胎膜早破的总发生率为 4%(95% CI,1%-11%),胎膜早破的总发生率为 10%(95% CI,3%-28%),胎儿发育不良的总发生率为 6%(95% CI,3%-11%)、胎儿生长受限为 5%(95% CI,2%-13%),胎儿宫内死亡为 12%(95% CI,5%-26%),产后出血为 74%(95% CI,45%-91%),产后需要输血为 74%(95% CI,45%-91%),选择剖宫产为 55%(95% CI,27%-80%)。AA 孕妇的孕产妇死亡率为 4%(95% CI,0.01-0.14),而新生儿死亡率为 7%(95% CI,0.03-0.18)。孕前 AA 完全缓解的几率要高于孕后(OR = 0.36;95% CI = 0.08-1.66),但结果仍不显著。剔除一项的敏感性分析没有改变主要结果的汇总估计值:结论:每八名确诊为 AA 的孕妇中就有一名可能罹患子痫前期。考虑到巨大的产科发病率和死亡率负担,AA缓解状态可能会在妊娠后恶化。
Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Aplastic Anemia During Pregnancy and Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Little scientific evidence exists on maternal and fetal outcomes in aplastic anemia (AA) during pregnancy.
Aim: The review was conducted to assess the maternal and fetal outcomes due to AA during pregnancy.
Data sources: Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and registries until May 5, 2024.
Study eligibility criteria: Studies (prospective, retrospective cohort, cross-sectional, one arm, survey, follow-up studies) evaluating AA during pregnancy were searched as per PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42024506668). Case reports, case series, expert opinion letters, and studies assessing less than or equal to 10 pregnant women were not considered. The primary outcome was the prevalence of preeclampsia in AA pregnancies. The secondary outcomes included spontaneous abortion, preterm premature rupture of membranes, premature rupture of membranes, fetal growth restriction, type of delivery, intrauterine fetal death, maternal and neonatal mortality, and pre and post-pregnancy remission status comparison.
Methods: The quality of research was checked using the New Castle-Ottawa risk-of-bias tool. A meta-analysis model with a random effect distribution, coupled with meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment, was used in the statistical software R. Standard Equator network study reporting guidelines were followed.
Results: Seven (one prospective and six retrospective cohort) studies included patients with confirmed AA diagnosis in 248 pregnancies. The pooled prevalence of preeclampsia was 13% (95% CI, 8%-20%). Heterogeneity was low in the present meta-analysis (I2 = 26%). The secondary outcome evaluation showed a pooled prevalence of 5% (95% CI, 3%-11%) for spontaneous abortion, 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%) for preterm premature rupture of membranes, 10% (95% CI, 3%-28%) for premature rupture of membranes, 6% (95% CI, 3%-11%) for fetal growth restriction, 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%) for intrauterine fetal death, 12% (95% CI, 5%-26%) for post-partum hemorrhage, 74% (95% CI, 45%-91%) for intrapartum transfusion requirement, and 55% (95% CI, 27%-80%) for the cesarean delivery opting. The maternal mortality in pregnancies with AA was 4% (95% CI, 0.01-0.14), whereas neonatal mortality was 7% (95% CI, 0.03-0.18). The odds of AA complete remission were better in pre-pregnancy than post-pregnancy (OR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.08-1.66), although the results remain insignificant. The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis did not change the pooled estimates for the primary outcome.
Conclusion: A risk of developing preeclampsia was observed in every eighth pregnant woman with an AA diagnosis. AA remission status might worsen after undergoing pregnancy, considering the significant obstetric morbidity and mortality burden.