英国医护人员在 COVID-19 期间的重新部署经历:来自全国性 UK-REACH 研究的横断面分析。

JRSM Open Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1177/20542704241290721
Zainab Zuzer Lal, Christopher A Martin, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Luke Bryant, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Amani Al-Oraibi, Jonathon Chaloner, Katherine Woolf, Manish Pareek
{"title":"英国医护人员在 COVID-19 期间的重新部署经历:来自全国性 UK-REACH 研究的横断面分析。","authors":"Zainab Zuzer Lal, Christopher A Martin, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Luke Bryant, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Amani Al-Oraibi, Jonathon Chaloner, Katherine Woolf, Manish Pareek","doi":"10.1177/20542704241290721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess how ethnicity, migration status and occupation are associated with healthcare workers (HCW) redeployment experiences during COVID-19 in a nationwide ethnically diverse sample.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis using data from the nationwide United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Healthcare workers (HCW).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Outcome measures included redeployment, provision of training and supervision during redeployment, change in patient contact and interaction with COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used logistic regression to examine associations of ethnicity, migration status, and occupation with redeployment experiences of HCWs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 10,889 HCWs included, 20.4% reported being redeployed during the first UK national lockdown in March 2020. Those in nursing roles (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04-1.42, <i>p</i> = 0.009) (compared to medical roles) had higher likelihood of being redeployed as did migrants compared to those born in the UK (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49, <i>p</i> = 0.01) (in a subcohort of HCWs on the agenda for change (AfC) pay scales). Asian HCWs were less likely to report receiving training (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and Black HCWs (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.14-3.57, <i>p</i> = 0.02) were more likely to report receiving supervision, compared to White colleagues. Finally, redeployed Black (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07-1.66, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and Asian HCWs (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14-1.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were more likely to report face-to-face interaction with COVID-19 patients than White HCWs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight disparities in HCWs' redeployment experiences by ethnicity, migration, and job role which are potentially related to structural inequalities in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":17674,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Open","volume":"15 9","pages":"20542704241290721"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redeployment experiences of healthcare workers in the UK during COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis from the nationwide UK-REACH study<sup />.\",\"authors\":\"Zainab Zuzer Lal, Christopher A Martin, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Luke Bryant, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Amani Al-Oraibi, Jonathon Chaloner, Katherine Woolf, Manish Pareek\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20542704241290721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess how ethnicity, migration status and occupation are associated with healthcare workers (HCW) redeployment experiences during COVID-19 in a nationwide ethnically diverse sample.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis using data from the nationwide United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Healthcare workers (HCW).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Outcome measures included redeployment, provision of training and supervision during redeployment, change in patient contact and interaction with COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used logistic regression to examine associations of ethnicity, migration status, and occupation with redeployment experiences of HCWs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 10,889 HCWs included, 20.4% reported being redeployed during the first UK national lockdown in March 2020. Those in nursing roles (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04-1.42, <i>p</i> = 0.009) (compared to medical roles) had higher likelihood of being redeployed as did migrants compared to those born in the UK (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49, <i>p</i> = 0.01) (in a subcohort of HCWs on the agenda for change (AfC) pay scales). Asian HCWs were less likely to report receiving training (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and Black HCWs (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.14-3.57, <i>p</i> = 0.02) were more likely to report receiving supervision, compared to White colleagues. Finally, redeployed Black (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07-1.66, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and Asian HCWs (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14-1.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were more likely to report face-to-face interaction with COVID-19 patients than White HCWs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight disparities in HCWs' redeployment experiences by ethnicity, migration, and job role which are potentially related to structural inequalities in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Open\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"20542704241290721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528580/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704241290721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704241290721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在全国不同种族的样本中,评估种族、移民身份和职业与医护人员(HCW)在 COVID-19 期间的重新部署经历有何关联:设计:利用英国全国范围内医护人员种族和 COVID-19 结果研究(UK-REACH)队列研究的数据进行横断面分析:医疗机构:主要结果测量:主要结果测量:结果测量包括重新部署、重新部署期间提供的培训和监督、与患者接触的变化以及与 COVID-19 患者的互动:我们使用逻辑回归法研究了种族、移民身份和职业与医护人员重新部署经历之间的关联:在纳入的 10889 名医护人员中,有 20.4% 的医护人员表示在 2020 年 3 月英国首次全国封锁期间被重新部署。与医务人员相比,从事护理工作的人员被重新部署的可能性更高(比值比 (OR) 1.22,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.04-1.42,p = 0.009);与在英国出生的人员相比,从事移民工作的人员被重新部署的可能性更高(比值比 1.26,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.06-1.49,p = 0.01)。与白人同事相比,亚裔医护人员接受培训的可能性较低(OR 0.66,95% CI 0.50-0.88,p = 0.005),黑人医护人员接受监督的可能性较高(OR 2.02,95% CI 1.14-3.57,p = 0.02)。最后,重新部署的黑人(OR 1.33,95% CI 1.07-1.66,p = 0.009)和亚裔医护人员(OR 1.30,95% CI 1.14-1.48,p 结论:与白人同事相比,黑人医护人员更有可能接受监督:我们的研究结果表明,不同种族、移民和工作角色的医护人员在被重新部署的经历上存在差异,这可能与医疗保健领域的结构性不平等有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redeployment experiences of healthcare workers in the UK during COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis from the nationwide UK-REACH study.

Objectives: To assess how ethnicity, migration status and occupation are associated with healthcare workers (HCW) redeployment experiences during COVID-19 in a nationwide ethnically diverse sample.

Design: A cross-sectional analysis using data from the nationwide United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) cohort study.

Setting: Healthcare settings.

Participants: Healthcare workers (HCW).

Main outcome measures: Outcome measures included redeployment, provision of training and supervision during redeployment, change in patient contact and interaction with COVID-19 patients.

Methods: We used logistic regression to examine associations of ethnicity, migration status, and occupation with redeployment experiences of HCWs.

Results: Of the 10,889 HCWs included, 20.4% reported being redeployed during the first UK national lockdown in March 2020. Those in nursing roles (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04-1.42, p = 0.009) (compared to medical roles) had higher likelihood of being redeployed as did migrants compared to those born in the UK (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49, p = 0.01) (in a subcohort of HCWs on the agenda for change (AfC) pay scales). Asian HCWs were less likely to report receiving training (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88, p = 0.005) and Black HCWs (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.14-3.57, p = 0.02) were more likely to report receiving supervision, compared to White colleagues. Finally, redeployed Black (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07-1.66, p = 0.009) and Asian HCWs (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14-1.48, p < 0.001) were more likely to report face-to-face interaction with COVID-19 patients than White HCWs.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight disparities in HCWs' redeployment experiences by ethnicity, migration, and job role which are potentially related to structural inequalities in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRSM Open is a peer reviewed online-only journal that follows the open-access publishing model. It is a companion journal to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. The journal publishes research papers, research letters, clinical and methodological reviews, and case reports. Our aim is to inform practice and policy making in clinical medicine. The journal has an international and multispecialty readership that includes primary care and public health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信