骨转移患者的立体定向放射治疗:生命最后一个月放射治疗率低的特定群体?

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Carsten Nieder, Ellinor C Haukland, Luka Stanisavljevic, Bård Mannsåker
{"title":"骨转移患者的立体定向放射治疗:生命最后一个月放射治疗率低的特定群体?","authors":"Carsten Nieder, Ellinor C Haukland, Luka Stanisavljevic, Bård Mannsåker","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02547-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex high-precision radiotherapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), should only be offered to patients with sufficiently long survival. In the context of bone metastases radiotherapy, low rates of treatment close to the end of life, e.g. last 30 days (RT30), may serve as a quality of care indicator. While traditional, pain-relieving short-course regimens have been studied comprehensively, real-world SBRT results are still limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis (2010-2023, n = 1117 episodes) of patients with bone metastases treated with traditional single-fraction (8 Gy × 1) or multi-fraction regimens (often 4 Gy × 5 or 3 Gy × 10) compared to stereotactic single-fraction (12-16 Gy × 1) or multi-fraction regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for gender, almost all baseline variables were uneven distributed. Failure to complete fractionated radiotherapy was uncommon in the stereotactic (4%) and non-stereotactic group (3%), p = 1.0. With regard to RT30, relevant differences emerged (19% for 8-Gy single-fraction versus 0% for stereotactic single-fraction, p = 0.01). The corresponding figures were 11% for multi-fraction non-stereotactic and 2% for multi-fraction stereotactic, p = 0.08. Median overall survival was shortest after 8-Gy single-fraction irradiation (4.2 months) and longest after stereotactic multi-fraction treatment (13.9 months). Neither stereotactic radiotherapy nor multi-fraction treatment improved survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Factors significantly associated with longer survival included better performance status, lower LabBM score (5 standard blood test results), stable disease outside of irradiated area(s), metachronous distant metastases, longer time interval from metastatic disease to bone irradiation, and outpatient status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of SBRT for selected patients has resulted in low rates of non-completion and RT30. Optimal selection criteria remain to be determined, but in current clinical practice we exclude patients with poor performance status, unfavorable blood test results (high LabBM score) and progressive disease sites not amenable to SBRT. Established, guideline-endorsed short-course regimens, especially 8-Gy single-fraction treatment, continue to represent an important palliative approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with bone metastases: a selected group with low rate of radiation treatment during the last month of life?\",\"authors\":\"Carsten Nieder, Ellinor C Haukland, Luka Stanisavljevic, Bård Mannsåker\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13014-024-02547-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex high-precision radiotherapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), should only be offered to patients with sufficiently long survival. In the context of bone metastases radiotherapy, low rates of treatment close to the end of life, e.g. last 30 days (RT30), may serve as a quality of care indicator. While traditional, pain-relieving short-course regimens have been studied comprehensively, real-world SBRT results are still limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis (2010-2023, n = 1117 episodes) of patients with bone metastases treated with traditional single-fraction (8 Gy × 1) or multi-fraction regimens (often 4 Gy × 5 or 3 Gy × 10) compared to stereotactic single-fraction (12-16 Gy × 1) or multi-fraction regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for gender, almost all baseline variables were uneven distributed. Failure to complete fractionated radiotherapy was uncommon in the stereotactic (4%) and non-stereotactic group (3%), p = 1.0. With regard to RT30, relevant differences emerged (19% for 8-Gy single-fraction versus 0% for stereotactic single-fraction, p = 0.01). The corresponding figures were 11% for multi-fraction non-stereotactic and 2% for multi-fraction stereotactic, p = 0.08. Median overall survival was shortest after 8-Gy single-fraction irradiation (4.2 months) and longest after stereotactic multi-fraction treatment (13.9 months). Neither stereotactic radiotherapy nor multi-fraction treatment improved survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Factors significantly associated with longer survival included better performance status, lower LabBM score (5 standard blood test results), stable disease outside of irradiated area(s), metachronous distant metastases, longer time interval from metastatic disease to bone irradiation, and outpatient status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of SBRT for selected patients has resulted in low rates of non-completion and RT30. Optimal selection criteria remain to be determined, but in current clinical practice we exclude patients with poor performance status, unfavorable blood test results (high LabBM score) and progressive disease sites not amenable to SBRT. Established, guideline-endorsed short-course regimens, especially 8-Gy single-fraction treatment, continue to represent an important palliative approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529251/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02547-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02547-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:只有生存期足够长的患者才能接受复杂的高精度放射治疗,如立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)。在骨转移放疗中,临近生命终点(如最后 30 天(RT30))的低治疗率可作为护理质量指标。虽然对传统的短程止痛方案进行了全面研究,但现实世界中的 SBRT 结果仍然有限:回顾性分析(2010-2023年,n = 1117次):采用传统单剂量(8 Gy × 1)或多剂量方案(通常为4 Gy × 5或3 Gy × 10)与立体定向单剂量(12-16 Gy × 1)或多剂量方案治疗的骨转移患者:除性别外,几乎所有基线变量的分布都不均衡。在立体定向组(4%)和非立体定向组(3%)中,未能完成分次放疗的情况并不常见,P = 1.0。在 RT30 方面,出现了相关差异(8-Gy 单次分次放疗为 19%,立体定向单次分次放疗为 0%,P = 0.01)。多分段非立体定向的相应数字为11%,多分段立体定向为2%,P = 0.08。8-Gy单剂量照射后的中位总生存期最短(4.2个月),立体定向多剂量治疗后的中位总生存期最长(13.9个月)。在多变量考克斯回归分析中,立体定向放疗和多分量治疗都不能提高生存率。与延长生存期明显相关的因素包括:较好的表现状态、较低的LabBM评分(5项标准血检结果)、照射区域外的疾病稳定、远处转移、从转移性疾病到骨照射的时间间隔较长以及门诊状态:结论:对经过选择的患者实施 SBRT 后,未完成率和 RT30 的发生率较低。最佳选择标准仍有待确定,但在目前的临床实践中,我们排除了表现状态不佳、血液检查结果不理想(LabBM评分较高)和疾病进展部位不适合SBRT的患者。经指南认可的既定短程治疗方案,尤其是 8 Gy 单次分次治疗,仍然是一种重要的姑息治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with bone metastases: a selected group with low rate of radiation treatment during the last month of life?

Background: Complex high-precision radiotherapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), should only be offered to patients with sufficiently long survival. In the context of bone metastases radiotherapy, low rates of treatment close to the end of life, e.g. last 30 days (RT30), may serve as a quality of care indicator. While traditional, pain-relieving short-course regimens have been studied comprehensively, real-world SBRT results are still limited.

Methods: Retrospective analysis (2010-2023, n = 1117 episodes) of patients with bone metastases treated with traditional single-fraction (8 Gy × 1) or multi-fraction regimens (often 4 Gy × 5 or 3 Gy × 10) compared to stereotactic single-fraction (12-16 Gy × 1) or multi-fraction regimens.

Results: Except for gender, almost all baseline variables were uneven distributed. Failure to complete fractionated radiotherapy was uncommon in the stereotactic (4%) and non-stereotactic group (3%), p = 1.0. With regard to RT30, relevant differences emerged (19% for 8-Gy single-fraction versus 0% for stereotactic single-fraction, p = 0.01). The corresponding figures were 11% for multi-fraction non-stereotactic and 2% for multi-fraction stereotactic, p = 0.08. Median overall survival was shortest after 8-Gy single-fraction irradiation (4.2 months) and longest after stereotactic multi-fraction treatment (13.9 months). Neither stereotactic radiotherapy nor multi-fraction treatment improved survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Factors significantly associated with longer survival included better performance status, lower LabBM score (5 standard blood test results), stable disease outside of irradiated area(s), metachronous distant metastases, longer time interval from metastatic disease to bone irradiation, and outpatient status.

Conclusion: The implementation of SBRT for selected patients has resulted in low rates of non-completion and RT30. Optimal selection criteria remain to be determined, but in current clinical practice we exclude patients with poor performance status, unfavorable blood test results (high LabBM score) and progressive disease sites not amenable to SBRT. Established, guideline-endorsed short-course regimens, especially 8-Gy single-fraction treatment, continue to represent an important palliative approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信