宫颈癌患者的三维打印近距离放射治疗:提高疗效和安全性。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Zenghong Lu, Gangfeng Zhu, Zhengang Qiu, Hailiang Guo, Junyan Li, Liangjian Zheng, Cixiang Chen, Jie Che, Yi Xiang, Yili Wang
{"title":"宫颈癌患者的三维打印近距离放射治疗:提高疗效和安全性。","authors":"Zenghong Lu, Gangfeng Zhu, Zhengang Qiu, Hailiang Guo, Junyan Li, Liangjian Zheng, Cixiang Chen, Jie Che, Yi Xiang, Yili Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02536-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3D printing technology in brachytherapy for cervical cancer, comparing its outcomes with conventional free hand implantation brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 cervical cancer patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College from January 2019 to July 2023 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: 25 patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with 3D-printed brachytherapy, and 25 patients underwent IMRT combined with free hand brachytherapy implantation. Key indicators analyzed included short-term therapeutic effects, survival outcomes, operation times, the number of CT scans, the number of needles inserted, dosimetric parameters, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of 3D-printed brachytherapy significantly improved the safety of radiation therapy operations, especially for large tumors (≥ 30 mm), by providing more precise dose distribution and reducing the radiation doses received by critical organs such as the bladder and rectum. Compared to the artificial implant group (88% prevalence), the 3D-printed brachytherapy group showed a significantly lower incidence of radiation enteritis (29.2% prevalence, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other complications between the two groups. For instance, the incidence of radiation cystitis was relatively high in the 3D-printed brachytherapy group (79.2% prevalence) compared to the artificial implant group (64% prevalence, p = 0.240). The median follow-up period in this study was 22.5 months [IQR 18-29]. Among the 49 patients included, 43 had cervical squamous carcinoma and 6 had cervical adenocarcinoma. Short-term therapeutic response rates were comparable, with no significant difference in overall survival observed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D-printed brachytherapy offers a more effective and safer therapeutic option for patients with cervical cancer, particularly for those with large tumors or complex anatomical structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D-printed brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer: improving efficacy and safety outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Zenghong Lu, Gangfeng Zhu, Zhengang Qiu, Hailiang Guo, Junyan Li, Liangjian Zheng, Cixiang Chen, Jie Che, Yi Xiang, Yili Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13014-024-02536-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3D printing technology in brachytherapy for cervical cancer, comparing its outcomes with conventional free hand implantation brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 cervical cancer patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College from January 2019 to July 2023 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: 25 patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with 3D-printed brachytherapy, and 25 patients underwent IMRT combined with free hand brachytherapy implantation. Key indicators analyzed included short-term therapeutic effects, survival outcomes, operation times, the number of CT scans, the number of needles inserted, dosimetric parameters, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of 3D-printed brachytherapy significantly improved the safety of radiation therapy operations, especially for large tumors (≥ 30 mm), by providing more precise dose distribution and reducing the radiation doses received by critical organs such as the bladder and rectum. Compared to the artificial implant group (88% prevalence), the 3D-printed brachytherapy group showed a significantly lower incidence of radiation enteritis (29.2% prevalence, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other complications between the two groups. For instance, the incidence of radiation cystitis was relatively high in the 3D-printed brachytherapy group (79.2% prevalence) compared to the artificial implant group (64% prevalence, p = 0.240). The median follow-up period in this study was 22.5 months [IQR 18-29]. Among the 49 patients included, 43 had cervical squamous carcinoma and 6 had cervical adenocarcinoma. Short-term therapeutic response rates were comparable, with no significant difference in overall survival observed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D-printed brachytherapy offers a more effective and safer therapeutic option for patients with cervical cancer, particularly for those with large tumors or complex anatomical structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531177/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02536-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02536-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估3D打印技术在宫颈癌近距离治疗中的有效性和安全性:本研究旨在评估3D打印技术在宫颈癌近距离治疗中的有效性和安全性,并将其结果与传统的徒手植入近距离治疗进行比较:本研究共纳入2019年1月至2023年7月在赣南医学院第一附属医院接受治疗的50例宫颈癌患者。将患者分为两组:25例患者接受调强放疗(IMRT)联合3D打印近距离治疗,25例患者接受IMRT联合徒手近距离植入治疗。分析的主要指标包括短期疗效、生存结果、手术时间、CT扫描次数、插针次数、剂量参数和并发症:结果:使用三维打印近距离放射治疗可提供更精确的剂量分布,减少膀胱和直肠等重要器官接受的辐射剂量,从而显著提高放疗手术的安全性,尤其是对大肿瘤(≥ 30 毫米)。与人工植入组(88%的发病率)相比,3D打印近距离治疗组的放射性肠炎发病率明显较低(29.2%的发病率,P 结论:3D打印近距离治疗为宫颈癌患者提供了更有效、更安全的治疗选择,尤其是对于那些肿瘤较大或解剖结构复杂的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
3D-printed brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer: improving efficacy and safety outcomes.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3D printing technology in brachytherapy for cervical cancer, comparing its outcomes with conventional free hand implantation brachytherapy.

Methods: A total of 50 cervical cancer patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College from January 2019 to July 2023 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: 25 patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with 3D-printed brachytherapy, and 25 patients underwent IMRT combined with free hand brachytherapy implantation. Key indicators analyzed included short-term therapeutic effects, survival outcomes, operation times, the number of CT scans, the number of needles inserted, dosimetric parameters, and complications.

Results: The use of 3D-printed brachytherapy significantly improved the safety of radiation therapy operations, especially for large tumors (≥ 30 mm), by providing more precise dose distribution and reducing the radiation doses received by critical organs such as the bladder and rectum. Compared to the artificial implant group (88% prevalence), the 3D-printed brachytherapy group showed a significantly lower incidence of radiation enteritis (29.2% prevalence, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other complications between the two groups. For instance, the incidence of radiation cystitis was relatively high in the 3D-printed brachytherapy group (79.2% prevalence) compared to the artificial implant group (64% prevalence, p = 0.240). The median follow-up period in this study was 22.5 months [IQR 18-29]. Among the 49 patients included, 43 had cervical squamous carcinoma and 6 had cervical adenocarcinoma. Short-term therapeutic response rates were comparable, with no significant difference in overall survival observed between the two groups.

Conclusion: 3D-printed brachytherapy offers a more effective and safer therapeutic option for patients with cervical cancer, particularly for those with large tumors or complex anatomical structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信