儿童手指关节外移位性指骨骨折复位后的伙伴绑带:随机对照试验。

Daniel M Weber, Christian Luckert, Markus Kalisch, Ulrike Subotic, Robert Weil, Michelle Seiler
{"title":"儿童手指关节外移位性指骨骨折复位后的伙伴绑带:随机对照试验。","authors":"Daniel M Weber, Christian Luckert, Markus Kalisch, Ulrike Subotic, Robert Weil, Michelle Seiler","doi":"10.1177/17531934241293338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this randomized controlled trial, we assessed the non-inferiority of buddy taping to splinting after reduction of displaced extra-articular proximal and middle phalangeal finger fractures in children. The primary outcome was the rate of secondary fracture displacements; the secondary outcomes were patient comfort, analgesic efficacy and total range of active motion 6 months after injury. Eighty-one patients participated: 43 with taping and 38 with splinting. Secondary displacement occurred in eight patients: five in the splinting group and three in the taping group. Risk difference was below the predefined non-inferiority of 10%. Patient comfort was significantly higher in the taping group, with no group differences for other parameters. Our previous study recommended taping for undisplaced finger fractures in children. With the current data, we recommend taping these finger fractures irrespective of displacement or need for reduction. We are encouraged to propose taping as an alternative to splinting for increased patient comfort, lower cost, and shorter application time.<b>Level of evidence:</b> I.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"17531934241293338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buddy taping after reduction of displaced extra-articular phalangeal finger fractures in children: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel M Weber, Christian Luckert, Markus Kalisch, Ulrike Subotic, Robert Weil, Michelle Seiler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17531934241293338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this randomized controlled trial, we assessed the non-inferiority of buddy taping to splinting after reduction of displaced extra-articular proximal and middle phalangeal finger fractures in children. The primary outcome was the rate of secondary fracture displacements; the secondary outcomes were patient comfort, analgesic efficacy and total range of active motion 6 months after injury. Eighty-one patients participated: 43 with taping and 38 with splinting. Secondary displacement occurred in eight patients: five in the splinting group and three in the taping group. Risk difference was below the predefined non-inferiority of 10%. Patient comfort was significantly higher in the taping group, with no group differences for other parameters. Our previous study recommended taping for undisplaced finger fractures in children. With the current data, we recommend taping these finger fractures irrespective of displacement or need for reduction. We are encouraged to propose taping as an alternative to splinting for increased patient comfort, lower cost, and shorter application time.<b>Level of evidence:</b> I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17531934241293338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241293338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241293338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项随机对照试验中,我们评估了在对儿童关节外移位的近节和中节指骨骨折进行复位后,伙伴绑带与夹板的非劣效性。主要结果是二次骨折移位率;次要结果是患者的舒适度、镇痛效果和伤后 6 个月的总活动范围。共有 81 名患者参与:其中 43 人使用了绑带,38 人使用了夹板。8名患者发生了二次移位:夹板组5人,绑带组3人。风险差异低于 10%的非劣效性预设值。绑扎组患者的舒适度明显更高,其他参数没有组间差异。我们之前的研究建议对儿童手指无错位骨折进行绑带治疗。根据目前的数据,我们建议对这些手指骨折进行绑带治疗,无论是否有移位或是否需要复位。我们建议将绑带疗法作为夹板疗法的替代方法,以提高患者的舒适度、降低成本并缩短应用时间:I.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Buddy taping after reduction of displaced extra-articular phalangeal finger fractures in children: a randomized controlled trial.

In this randomized controlled trial, we assessed the non-inferiority of buddy taping to splinting after reduction of displaced extra-articular proximal and middle phalangeal finger fractures in children. The primary outcome was the rate of secondary fracture displacements; the secondary outcomes were patient comfort, analgesic efficacy and total range of active motion 6 months after injury. Eighty-one patients participated: 43 with taping and 38 with splinting. Secondary displacement occurred in eight patients: five in the splinting group and three in the taping group. Risk difference was below the predefined non-inferiority of 10%. Patient comfort was significantly higher in the taping group, with no group differences for other parameters. Our previous study recommended taping for undisplaced finger fractures in children. With the current data, we recommend taping these finger fractures irrespective of displacement or need for reduction. We are encouraged to propose taping as an alternative to splinting for increased patient comfort, lower cost, and shorter application time.Level of evidence: I.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信