利用长短期记忆网络预测伽马射线发射。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Fan Xiao, Domagoj Radonic, Michael Kriechbaum, Niklas Wahl, Ahmad Neishabouri, Nikolaos Delopoulos, Katia Parodi, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry, George Dedes
{"title":"利用长短期记忆网络预测伽马射线发射。","authors":"Fan Xiao, Domagoj Radonic, Michael Kriechbaum, Niklas Wahl, Ahmad Neishabouri, Nikolaos Delopoulos, Katia Parodi, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry, George Dedes","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8e2a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: To present a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based prompt gamma (PG) emission prediction method for proton therapy.<i>Approach</i>: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 33 patients with a prostate tumor were included in the dataset. A set of 10<sup>7</sup>histories proton pencil beam (PB)s was generated for Monte Carlo (MC) dose and PG simulation. For training (20 patients) and validation (3 patients), over 6000 PBs at 150, 175 and 200 MeV were simulated. 3D relative stopping power (RSP), PG and dose cuboids that included the PB were extracted. Three models were trained, validated and tested based on an LSTM-based network: (1) input RSP and output PG, (2) input RSP with dose and output PG (single-energy), and (3) input RSP/dose and output PG (multi-energy). 540 PBs at each of the four energy levels (150, 175, 200, and 125-210 MeV) were simulated across 10 patients to test the three models. The gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) and PG range shift were evaluated and compared among the three models.<i>Results</i>: The model with input RSP/dose and output PG (multi-energy) showed the best performance in terms of gamma passing rate and range shift metrics. Its mean gamma passing rate of testing PBs of 125-210 MeV was 98.5% and the worst case was 92.8%. Its mean absolute range shift between predicted and MC PGs was 0.15 mm, where the maximum shift was 1.1 mm. The prediction time of our models was within 130 ms per PB.<i>Significance</i>: We developed a sub-second LSTM-based PG emission prediction method. Its accuracy in prostate patients has been confirmed across an extensive range of proton energies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prompt gamma emission prediction using a long short-term memory network.\",\"authors\":\"Fan Xiao, Domagoj Radonic, Michael Kriechbaum, Niklas Wahl, Ahmad Neishabouri, Nikolaos Delopoulos, Katia Parodi, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry, George Dedes\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8e2a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: To present a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based prompt gamma (PG) emission prediction method for proton therapy.<i>Approach</i>: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 33 patients with a prostate tumor were included in the dataset. A set of 10<sup>7</sup>histories proton pencil beam (PB)s was generated for Monte Carlo (MC) dose and PG simulation. For training (20 patients) and validation (3 patients), over 6000 PBs at 150, 175 and 200 MeV were simulated. 3D relative stopping power (RSP), PG and dose cuboids that included the PB were extracted. Three models were trained, validated and tested based on an LSTM-based network: (1) input RSP and output PG, (2) input RSP with dose and output PG (single-energy), and (3) input RSP/dose and output PG (multi-energy). 540 PBs at each of the four energy levels (150, 175, 200, and 125-210 MeV) were simulated across 10 patients to test the three models. The gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) and PG range shift were evaluated and compared among the three models.<i>Results</i>: The model with input RSP/dose and output PG (multi-energy) showed the best performance in terms of gamma passing rate and range shift metrics. Its mean gamma passing rate of testing PBs of 125-210 MeV was 98.5% and the worst case was 92.8%. Its mean absolute range shift between predicted and MC PGs was 0.15 mm, where the maximum shift was 1.1 mm. The prediction time of our models was within 130 ms per PB.<i>Significance</i>: We developed a sub-second LSTM-based PG emission prediction method. Its accuracy in prostate patients has been confirmed across an extensive range of proton energies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8e2a\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8e2a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的介绍一种基于长短期记忆(LSTM)的质子治疗瞬时伽马(PG)发射预测方法:方法:数据集包括 33 名前列腺肿瘤患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描结果。数据集中包含 33 名前列腺肿瘤患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描结果,并生成了一组 1000 万个质子铅笔束(PB)的历史记录,用于蒙特卡罗(MC)剂量和 PG 模拟。在训练(20 名患者)和验证(3 名患者)中,模拟了超过 6000 个 150、175 和 200 MeV 的质子铅笔束。提取了包含 PB 的三维相对停止功率 (RSP)、PG 和剂量立方体。基于 LSTM 网络训练、验证和测试了三种模型:(1) 输入 RSP 和输出 PG;(2) 输入 RSP 与剂量和输出 PG(单能量);(3) 输入 RSP/剂量和输出 PG(多能量)。对 10 名患者分别模拟了 150、175、200 和 125-210 MeV 四种能量水平的 540 个 PB,以测试这三种模型。对伽马通过率(2%/2mm)和 PG 范围偏移进行了评估,并对三种模型进行了比较:结果:输入 RSP/剂量和输出 PG(多能量)的模型在伽马通过率和范围偏移指标方面表现最佳。在测试 125-210 MeV 的 PB 时,其平均伽马通过率为 98.5%,最差情况为 92.8%。其预测 PG 与 MC PG 之间的平均绝对范围偏移为 0.15 毫米,最大偏移为 1.1 毫米。我们模型的预测时间在每个 PB 130 毫秒以内:我们开发了一种基于 LSTM 的亚秒级 PG 发射预测方法。我们开发了一种基于 LSTM 的亚秒级 PG 发射预测方法,其对前列腺患者的准确性已在广泛的质子能量范围内得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prompt gamma emission prediction using a long short-term memory network.

Objective: To present a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based prompt gamma (PG) emission prediction method for proton therapy.Approach: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 33 patients with a prostate tumor were included in the dataset. A set of 107histories proton pencil beam (PB)s was generated for Monte Carlo (MC) dose and PG simulation. For training (20 patients) and validation (3 patients), over 6000 PBs at 150, 175 and 200 MeV were simulated. 3D relative stopping power (RSP), PG and dose cuboids that included the PB were extracted. Three models were trained, validated and tested based on an LSTM-based network: (1) input RSP and output PG, (2) input RSP with dose and output PG (single-energy), and (3) input RSP/dose and output PG (multi-energy). 540 PBs at each of the four energy levels (150, 175, 200, and 125-210 MeV) were simulated across 10 patients to test the three models. The gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) and PG range shift were evaluated and compared among the three models.Results: The model with input RSP/dose and output PG (multi-energy) showed the best performance in terms of gamma passing rate and range shift metrics. Its mean gamma passing rate of testing PBs of 125-210 MeV was 98.5% and the worst case was 92.8%. Its mean absolute range shift between predicted and MC PGs was 0.15 mm, where the maximum shift was 1.1 mm. The prediction time of our models was within 130 ms per PB.Significance: We developed a sub-second LSTM-based PG emission prediction method. Its accuracy in prostate patients has been confirmed across an extensive range of proton energies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信