探索在 5G 支持下进行上门胶囊内窥镜检查的可行性:创新和碳足迹见解。

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gohar Jalayeri Nia, Cassie Conway, Frances Ward, Sheena Dungey, Linda Streames, Bei Bei Liu, Ian Lo Lei, James Cameron, Hagen Wenzek, Chander Shekhar, Sally Eason, Ramesh P Arasaradnam
{"title":"探索在 5G 支持下进行上门胶囊内窥镜检查的可行性:创新和碳足迹见解。","authors":"Gohar Jalayeri Nia, Cassie Conway, Frances Ward, Sheena Dungey, Linda Streames, Bei Bei Liu, Ian Lo Lei, James Cameron, Hagen Wenzek, Chander Shekhar, Sally Eason, Ramesh P Arasaradnam","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health threat, necessitating early detection. Traditional diagnostic tools like optical colonoscopy have limitations prompting our '5G-SUCCEEDS' initiative to explore a novel approach involving remote colon capsule endoscopy (CCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective feasibility study was conducted at a single hospital in England. Between December 2022 and September 2023, we introduced a remote CCE service within the 5G-SUCCEEDS framework. We undertook a feasibility study of CCE in patients with low-risk/moderate-risk CRC stratified by faecal haemoglobin. Outcomes included carbon footprint analysis (outlined through three potential clinical pathways) and patient-reported outcomes through structured questionnaires and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 25 participants, 88% expressed satisfaction with remote CCE. 82% were willing to have remote CCE if clinically indicated in future. CCE findings included adenomatous polyps (58%), normal results (17%) and diverticulosis (21%), with no cancers identified in this pilot. Notably, we found that the carbon footprint associated with delivery of CCE at home (pathway 3) was lower compared with CCE delivered in a clinical setting (pathway 2). A fully optimised, automated scaled-up pathway would combine the delivery and collection of CCE equipment within a local area to reduce the carbon footprint of the travel element by 75%. Moreover, the conversion rate into a colonoscopy pathway is not static and clinicians acknowledge that this could be as low as 28%. Carbon footprint is more favourable for home-delivered CCE in the optimised scenario, while less so when considering the need for additional procedures (colonoscopy conversion).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5G-SUCCEEDS initiative highlights the feasibility and advantages of home-based diagnostics using CCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the feasibility of home-delivered capsule endoscopy with 5G support: innovations and carbon footprint insights.\",\"authors\":\"Gohar Jalayeri Nia, Cassie Conway, Frances Ward, Sheena Dungey, Linda Streames, Bei Bei Liu, Ian Lo Lei, James Cameron, Hagen Wenzek, Chander Shekhar, Sally Eason, Ramesh P Arasaradnam\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health threat, necessitating early detection. Traditional diagnostic tools like optical colonoscopy have limitations prompting our '5G-SUCCEEDS' initiative to explore a novel approach involving remote colon capsule endoscopy (CCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective feasibility study was conducted at a single hospital in England. Between December 2022 and September 2023, we introduced a remote CCE service within the 5G-SUCCEEDS framework. We undertook a feasibility study of CCE in patients with low-risk/moderate-risk CRC stratified by faecal haemoglobin. Outcomes included carbon footprint analysis (outlined through three potential clinical pathways) and patient-reported outcomes through structured questionnaires and interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 25 participants, 88% expressed satisfaction with remote CCE. 82% were willing to have remote CCE if clinically indicated in future. CCE findings included adenomatous polyps (58%), normal results (17%) and diverticulosis (21%), with no cancers identified in this pilot. Notably, we found that the carbon footprint associated with delivery of CCE at home (pathway 3) was lower compared with CCE delivered in a clinical setting (pathway 2). A fully optimised, automated scaled-up pathway would combine the delivery and collection of CCE equipment within a local area to reduce the carbon footprint of the travel element by 75%. Moreover, the conversion rate into a colonoscopy pathway is not static and clinicians acknowledge that this could be as low as 28%. Carbon footprint is more favourable for home-delivered CCE in the optimised scenario, while less so when considering the need for additional procedures (colonoscopy conversion).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5G-SUCCEEDS initiative highlights the feasibility and advantages of home-based diagnostics using CCE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529455/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介结肠直肠癌(CRC)对全球健康构成重大威胁,必须及早发现。光学结肠镜等传统诊断工具存在局限性,这促使我们的 "5G-SUCCEEDS "计划探索一种涉及远程结肠胶囊内镜(CCE)的新方法:这项前瞻性可行性研究在英国一家医院进行。2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 9 月期间,我们在 5G-SUCCEEDS 框架内引入了远程 CCE 服务。我们对按粪便血红蛋白分层的低风险/中度风险 CRC 患者进行了 CCE 可行性研究。研究结果包括碳足迹分析(通过三种可能的临床路径进行概述)以及通过结构化问卷和访谈进行的患者报告结果:结果:在 25 名参与者中,88% 的人对远程 CCE 表示满意。结果:在 25 名参与者中,88% 的人对远程 CCE 表示满意,82% 的人愿意在将来有临床需要时进行远程 CCE。CCE 结果包括腺瘤性息肉(58%)、正常结果(17%)和憩室(21%),本次试验未发现癌症。值得注意的是,我们发现在家进行 CCE(路径 3)与在临床环境中进行 CCE(路径 2)相比,碳足迹更低。经过全面优化的自动化扩大路径将把在当地提供和收集 CCE 设备结合起来,从而将旅行环节的碳足迹减少 75%。此外,结肠镜检查路径的转换率并不是一成不变的,临床医生承认转换率可能低至 28%。在优化方案中,碳足迹更有利于家庭交付的 CCE,而在考虑到需要额外程序(结肠镜检查转换)时,碳足迹就不那么有利了:5G-SUCCEEDS计划凸显了使用CCE进行家庭诊断的可行性和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the feasibility of home-delivered capsule endoscopy with 5G support: innovations and carbon footprint insights.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health threat, necessitating early detection. Traditional diagnostic tools like optical colonoscopy have limitations prompting our '5G-SUCCEEDS' initiative to explore a novel approach involving remote colon capsule endoscopy (CCE).

Methods: This prospective feasibility study was conducted at a single hospital in England. Between December 2022 and September 2023, we introduced a remote CCE service within the 5G-SUCCEEDS framework. We undertook a feasibility study of CCE in patients with low-risk/moderate-risk CRC stratified by faecal haemoglobin. Outcomes included carbon footprint analysis (outlined through three potential clinical pathways) and patient-reported outcomes through structured questionnaires and interviews.

Results: Among 25 participants, 88% expressed satisfaction with remote CCE. 82% were willing to have remote CCE if clinically indicated in future. CCE findings included adenomatous polyps (58%), normal results (17%) and diverticulosis (21%), with no cancers identified in this pilot. Notably, we found that the carbon footprint associated with delivery of CCE at home (pathway 3) was lower compared with CCE delivered in a clinical setting (pathway 2). A fully optimised, automated scaled-up pathway would combine the delivery and collection of CCE equipment within a local area to reduce the carbon footprint of the travel element by 75%. Moreover, the conversion rate into a colonoscopy pathway is not static and clinicians acknowledge that this could be as low as 28%. Carbon footprint is more favourable for home-delivered CCE in the optimised scenario, while less so when considering the need for additional procedures (colonoscopy conversion).

Conclusion: The 5G-SUCCEEDS initiative highlights the feasibility and advantages of home-based diagnostics using CCE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信