药剂师指导基层诊所糖尿病管理的成本效益分析。

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v15i3.6300
Cynthia A King, Benjamin S King, Tara Nagaraj, M Dave Gothard
{"title":"药剂师指导基层诊所糖尿病管理的成本效益分析。","authors":"Cynthia A King, Benjamin S King, Tara Nagaraj, M Dave Gothard","doi":"10.24926/iip.v15i3.6300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose:</i> Ambulatory care pharmacists (ACPs) on healthcare teams improve patient outcomes and can manage multiple chronic disease states. ACPs have demonstrated clinical benefit but need to prove financial sustainability. The primary objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of utilizing ACPs for diabetes mellitus (DM) management. <i>Methods:</i> This was a quasi-experimental, retrospective, single health system, multi-clinic cohort study of 406 patients living with DM, ≥ 18 years of age, with a HbA1c of ≥ 8%, receiving primary care services within an academic health system between May 2015 to March 2018. In the ACP group, the ACP was part of the care team for DM management while in the PCP group, patients were managed only by a PCP with or without an endocrinologist (usual care). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to determine the clinic-associated cost of an ACP-led DM management clinic. <i>Results:</i> Based on the ICER calculation, clinic-associated cost for ACP-led DM management was $126 per patient per year for each additional HbA1c percent lowered. Additional ICER calculations demonstrated the clinic-associated cost to move one patient with HbA1c ≥9% to HbA1c < 9% was $612. Change in HbA1c over 12 months was -2.5% in the ACP group and in the PCP group +1.08% (p<0.001). Based on quality metrics at 12-months, the ACP group met the goal of 75% of patients having a HbA1c < 9% and being prescribed a statin vs. the PCP group only met the metric for statin use. Based on facility fee billing, the ACPs cover approximately 70% of their annual salary and benefits from face-to-face visits. <i>Conclusions:</i> ACPs led to significantly improved clinical outcomes with marginal up-front costs that could lead potential future cost savings through reductions in DM related complications or improving incentivized returns by achieving goal quality metric levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacist-Led Diabetes Management Across Primary Care Clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia A King, Benjamin S King, Tara Nagaraj, M Dave Gothard\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/iip.v15i3.6300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose:</i> Ambulatory care pharmacists (ACPs) on healthcare teams improve patient outcomes and can manage multiple chronic disease states. ACPs have demonstrated clinical benefit but need to prove financial sustainability. The primary objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of utilizing ACPs for diabetes mellitus (DM) management. <i>Methods:</i> This was a quasi-experimental, retrospective, single health system, multi-clinic cohort study of 406 patients living with DM, ≥ 18 years of age, with a HbA1c of ≥ 8%, receiving primary care services within an academic health system between May 2015 to March 2018. In the ACP group, the ACP was part of the care team for DM management while in the PCP group, patients were managed only by a PCP with or without an endocrinologist (usual care). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to determine the clinic-associated cost of an ACP-led DM management clinic. <i>Results:</i> Based on the ICER calculation, clinic-associated cost for ACP-led DM management was $126 per patient per year for each additional HbA1c percent lowered. Additional ICER calculations demonstrated the clinic-associated cost to move one patient with HbA1c ≥9% to HbA1c < 9% was $612. Change in HbA1c over 12 months was -2.5% in the ACP group and in the PCP group +1.08% (p<0.001). Based on quality metrics at 12-months, the ACP group met the goal of 75% of patients having a HbA1c < 9% and being prescribed a statin vs. the PCP group only met the metric for statin use. Based on facility fee billing, the ACPs cover approximately 70% of their annual salary and benefits from face-to-face visits. <i>Conclusions:</i> ACPs led to significantly improved clinical outcomes with marginal up-front costs that could lead potential future cost savings through reductions in DM related complications or improving incentivized returns by achieving goal quality metric levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i3.6300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i3.6300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医疗保健团队中的非住院护理药剂师 (ACP) 可以改善患者的治疗效果,并能管理多种慢性疾病。非住院护理药剂师的临床疗效已得到证实,但还需要证明其在财务上的可持续性。本研究的主要目的是确定在糖尿病(DM)管理中使用非住院护理药剂师的成本效益。方法:这是一项准实验性、回顾性、单一医疗系统、多诊所队列研究,研究对象为 2015 年 5 月至 2018 年 3 月期间在一个学术医疗系统内接受初级保健服务的 406 名糖尿病患者,年龄≥ 18 岁,HbA1c ≥ 8%。在ACP组中,ACP是DM管理护理团队的一部分,而在PCP组中,患者仅由PCP管理,无论是否有内分泌科医生(常规护理)。通过计算增量成本效益比 (ICER),确定了由 ACP 领导的 DM 管理门诊的门诊相关成本。结果:根据 ICER 计算结果,ACP 领导的 DM 管理诊所的相关成本为每名患者每年 126 美元,HbA1c 百分比每降低一个百分点。其他 ICER 计算显示,将一名 HbA1c ≥9% 的患者转为 HbA1c <9% 的诊所相关成本为 612 美元。12 个月内,ACP 组患者的 HbA1c 变化率为 -2.5%,而 PCP 组患者的 HbA1c 变化率为 +1.08% (p 结论:ACP 显著改善了患者的临床治疗效果:ACP 显著改善了临床疗效,但前期成本较低,未来可通过减少糖尿病相关并发症或通过达到目标质量指标水平提高激励回报来节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacist-Led Diabetes Management Across Primary Care Clinics.

Purpose: Ambulatory care pharmacists (ACPs) on healthcare teams improve patient outcomes and can manage multiple chronic disease states. ACPs have demonstrated clinical benefit but need to prove financial sustainability. The primary objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of utilizing ACPs for diabetes mellitus (DM) management. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental, retrospective, single health system, multi-clinic cohort study of 406 patients living with DM, ≥ 18 years of age, with a HbA1c of ≥ 8%, receiving primary care services within an academic health system between May 2015 to March 2018. In the ACP group, the ACP was part of the care team for DM management while in the PCP group, patients were managed only by a PCP with or without an endocrinologist (usual care). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to determine the clinic-associated cost of an ACP-led DM management clinic. Results: Based on the ICER calculation, clinic-associated cost for ACP-led DM management was $126 per patient per year for each additional HbA1c percent lowered. Additional ICER calculations demonstrated the clinic-associated cost to move one patient with HbA1c ≥9% to HbA1c < 9% was $612. Change in HbA1c over 12 months was -2.5% in the ACP group and in the PCP group +1.08% (p<0.001). Based on quality metrics at 12-months, the ACP group met the goal of 75% of patients having a HbA1c < 9% and being prescribed a statin vs. the PCP group only met the metric for statin use. Based on facility fee billing, the ACPs cover approximately 70% of their annual salary and benefits from face-to-face visits. Conclusions: ACPs led to significantly improved clinical outcomes with marginal up-front costs that could lead potential future cost savings through reductions in DM related complications or improving incentivized returns by achieving goal quality metric levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信