二甲双胍不耐受评估:回顾病历

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v15i3.5779
Pilar Z Murphy, Alanna Bramwell-Shittu, Kaci Boehmer, Jacob Painter, Ruchira Mahashabde
{"title":"二甲双胍不耐受评估:回顾病历","authors":"Pilar Z Murphy, Alanna Bramwell-Shittu, Kaci Boehmer, Jacob Painter, Ruchira Mahashabde","doi":"10.24926/iip.v15i3.5779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> The aim of the present study is to determine similarities between patients with type 2 diabetes not on metformin therapy compared to patients on metformin therapy at a resident-led primary care clinic. <i>Methods:</i> An exploratory, single-center retrospective chart review was performed on patients 18 years and older with a documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes seen at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Family Medicine Clinic in Little Rock, Arkansas. Of the 2452 patients who met criteria for the study, 1085 patients did not have a documented metformin allergy. A subset of 216 patients who were not currently prescribed metformin and had no documented metformin allergy were further examined and compared to the 869 patients who were prescribed metformin. We sought to determine reasons for nonuse by evaluating their EPIC electronic health record. Information on these patients such as race, gender, hemoglobin A1c (A1c), kidney function, stated metformin intolerance, and comorbid disease states such as neuropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), ulcerative colitis, and irritable bowel syndrome were collected. Further examination was performed to determine why patients were not on metformin therapy and potential similarities between metformin intolerant patients. <i>Results:</i> The results of the study indicated a significant difference between metformin users and non-users in relation to body mass index (BMI) and diagnosis of CKD. Metformin non-users were found to have significantly lower mean BMI (30.87 vs. 35.43; p-value <0.0001), and significantly higher rates of CKD (25.93% vs 14.73%; p-value <0.0001) as compared to metformin users. BMI value of patients (coefficient: 0.2033, p value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and positively correlated with metformin use, and CKD (coefficient: - 0.1191, p-value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and negatively correlated with metformin use. A1c levels for patients not on metformin therapy were evaluated. Most non-metformin patients fell in prediabetic A1c levels ranging from 5-6.4% (84 patients; 38.89%), and 31 patients (14.35%) should be on insulin therapy according to guidelines. <i>Conclusion:</i> The results demonstrated that patients with lower BMI, CKD, or A1c in the prediabetic range were less likely to be prescribed metformin.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Metformin Intolerance: A Retrospective Chart Review.\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Z Murphy, Alanna Bramwell-Shittu, Kaci Boehmer, Jacob Painter, Ruchira Mahashabde\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/iip.v15i3.5779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> The aim of the present study is to determine similarities between patients with type 2 diabetes not on metformin therapy compared to patients on metformin therapy at a resident-led primary care clinic. <i>Methods:</i> An exploratory, single-center retrospective chart review was performed on patients 18 years and older with a documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes seen at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Family Medicine Clinic in Little Rock, Arkansas. Of the 2452 patients who met criteria for the study, 1085 patients did not have a documented metformin allergy. A subset of 216 patients who were not currently prescribed metformin and had no documented metformin allergy were further examined and compared to the 869 patients who were prescribed metformin. We sought to determine reasons for nonuse by evaluating their EPIC electronic health record. Information on these patients such as race, gender, hemoglobin A1c (A1c), kidney function, stated metformin intolerance, and comorbid disease states such as neuropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), ulcerative colitis, and irritable bowel syndrome were collected. Further examination was performed to determine why patients were not on metformin therapy and potential similarities between metformin intolerant patients. <i>Results:</i> The results of the study indicated a significant difference between metformin users and non-users in relation to body mass index (BMI) and diagnosis of CKD. Metformin non-users were found to have significantly lower mean BMI (30.87 vs. 35.43; p-value <0.0001), and significantly higher rates of CKD (25.93% vs 14.73%; p-value <0.0001) as compared to metformin users. BMI value of patients (coefficient: 0.2033, p value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and positively correlated with metformin use, and CKD (coefficient: - 0.1191, p-value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and negatively correlated with metformin use. A1c levels for patients not on metformin therapy were evaluated. Most non-metformin patients fell in prediabetic A1c levels ranging from 5-6.4% (84 patients; 38.89%), and 31 patients (14.35%) should be on insulin therapy according to guidelines. <i>Conclusion:</i> The results demonstrated that patients with lower BMI, CKD, or A1c in the prediabetic range were less likely to be prescribed metformin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i3.5779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i3.5779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定在居民主导的初级保健诊所中,未接受二甲双胍治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者与接受二甲双胍治疗的患者之间的相似性。研究方法对阿肯色州小石城阿肯色医科大学全科诊所就诊的 18 岁及以上、确诊为 2 型糖尿病的患者进行探索性、单中心回顾性病历审查。在符合研究标准的 2452 名患者中,有 1085 名患者没有二甲双胍过敏的记录。我们进一步研究了 216 名目前未被处方二甲双胍且无二甲双胍过敏记录的患者,并将其与 869 名被处方二甲双胍的患者进行了比较。我们试图通过评估他们的 EPIC 电子健康记录来确定不使用二甲双胍的原因。我们收集了这些患者的种族、性别、血红蛋白 A1c (A1c)、肾功能、二甲双胍不耐受声明以及神经病变、慢性肾病 (CKD)、溃疡性结肠炎和肠易激综合征等合并疾病的信息。进一步检查的目的是确定患者不接受二甲双胍治疗的原因,以及二甲双胍不耐受患者之间可能存在的相似之处。研究结果研究结果表明,二甲双胍使用者和非使用者在体重指数(BMI)和慢性肾脏病诊断方面存在显著差异。未使用二甲双胍的患者的平均体重指数明显较低(30.87 对 35.43;P 值 结论:研究结果表明,体重指数较低的二甲双胍使用者与未使用二甲双胍的患者之间存在显著差异:结果表明,体重指数(BMI)较低、患有慢性阻塞性肺病或 A1c 在糖尿病前期范围内的患者获得二甲双胍处方的可能性较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Metformin Intolerance: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to determine similarities between patients with type 2 diabetes not on metformin therapy compared to patients on metformin therapy at a resident-led primary care clinic. Methods: An exploratory, single-center retrospective chart review was performed on patients 18 years and older with a documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes seen at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Family Medicine Clinic in Little Rock, Arkansas. Of the 2452 patients who met criteria for the study, 1085 patients did not have a documented metformin allergy. A subset of 216 patients who were not currently prescribed metformin and had no documented metformin allergy were further examined and compared to the 869 patients who were prescribed metformin. We sought to determine reasons for nonuse by evaluating their EPIC electronic health record. Information on these patients such as race, gender, hemoglobin A1c (A1c), kidney function, stated metformin intolerance, and comorbid disease states such as neuropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), ulcerative colitis, and irritable bowel syndrome were collected. Further examination was performed to determine why patients were not on metformin therapy and potential similarities between metformin intolerant patients. Results: The results of the study indicated a significant difference between metformin users and non-users in relation to body mass index (BMI) and diagnosis of CKD. Metformin non-users were found to have significantly lower mean BMI (30.87 vs. 35.43; p-value <0.0001), and significantly higher rates of CKD (25.93% vs 14.73%; p-value <0.0001) as compared to metformin users. BMI value of patients (coefficient: 0.2033, p value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and positively correlated with metformin use, and CKD (coefficient: - 0.1191, p-value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and negatively correlated with metformin use. A1c levels for patients not on metformin therapy were evaluated. Most non-metformin patients fell in prediabetic A1c levels ranging from 5-6.4% (84 patients; 38.89%), and 31 patients (14.35%) should be on insulin therapy according to guidelines. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that patients with lower BMI, CKD, or A1c in the prediabetic range were less likely to be prescribed metformin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信