动脉与潮气末二氧化碳梯度作为重症监护严重程度指数的实用性。

Kyung Sook Hong, Jae Gil Lee, Tae Yoon Kim, Jae-Myeong Lee, Hoonsung Park, Hanyoung Lee, Na Rae Yang, Seung Min Baik
{"title":"动脉与潮气末二氧化碳梯度作为重症监护严重程度指数的实用性。","authors":"Kyung Sook Hong, Jae Gil Lee, Tae Yoon Kim, Jae-Myeong Lee, Hoonsung Park, Hanyoung Lee, Na Rae Yang, Seung Min Baik","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient (P [a-Et] CO<sub>2</sub>) reveals the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) status of critically ill patients. V/Q mismatch has several causes and affects the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. We investigated the relationship between P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> and the clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Critically ill patients (n = 1,978) on mechanical ventilation and capnography in the intensive care units of two institutions were enrolled and categorized into three groups: P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> ≤10 mmHg (low group), 10 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 20 mmHg (medium group), and 20 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> (high group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 29.5 ± 8.1, 31.3 ± 8.2, and 33.3 ± 8.7 in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall mortality rates were 25.5 %, 35.6 %, and 52.8 % in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The odds ratio was 1.456 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.117-1.897, p = 0.002) and 2.320 (95 % CI: 1.635-3.293, p < 0.001) for the medium and high groups, respectively, with the low group as a reference. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> for overall mortality was 0.604 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> is a simple, easily accessible indicator that potentially impacts patient care and outcomes as an independent marker for assessing disease severity and predicting mortality, especially in non-respiratory critical care scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient as a severity index in critical care.\",\"authors\":\"Kyung Sook Hong, Jae Gil Lee, Tae Yoon Kim, Jae-Myeong Lee, Hoonsung Park, Hanyoung Lee, Na Rae Yang, Seung Min Baik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient (P [a-Et] CO<sub>2</sub>) reveals the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) status of critically ill patients. V/Q mismatch has several causes and affects the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. We investigated the relationship between P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> and the clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Critically ill patients (n = 1,978) on mechanical ventilation and capnography in the intensive care units of two institutions were enrolled and categorized into three groups: P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> ≤10 mmHg (low group), 10 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 20 mmHg (medium group), and 20 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> (high group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 29.5 ± 8.1, 31.3 ± 8.2, and 33.3 ± 8.7 in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall mortality rates were 25.5 %, 35.6 %, and 52.8 % in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The odds ratio was 1.456 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.117-1.897, p = 0.002) and 2.320 (95 % CI: 1.635-3.293, p < 0.001) for the medium and high groups, respectively, with the low group as a reference. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> for overall mortality was 0.604 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> is a simple, easily accessible indicator that potentially impacts patient care and outcomes as an independent marker for assessing disease severity and predicting mortality, especially in non-respiratory critical care scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of the medical sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of the medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2024.10.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2024.10.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:动脉与潮气末二氧化碳梯度(P [a-Et] CO2)显示了重症患者的通气-灌注(V/Q)状态。V/Q 不匹配有多种原因,会影响危重病人的临床预后。我们研究了 P (a-Et) CO2 与重症患者临床预后之间的关系:方法:我们选取了两家医院重症监护室中使用机械通气并接受二氧化碳呼气检测的重症患者(1 978 人)为研究对象,并将其分为三组:P (a-Et) CO2 ≤ 10 mmHg(低组)、10 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO2 ≤ 20 mmHg(中组)和 20 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO2(高组):低、中、高组的急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分分别为 29.5 ± 8.1、31.3 ± 8.2 和 33.3 ± 8.7(P < 0.001)。低、中、高组的总死亡率分别为 25.5%、35.6% 和 52.8%(P < 0.001)。以低度组为参照,中度组和高度组的几率比分别为 1.456(95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.117-1.897,p = 0.002)和 2.320(95% CI:1.635-3.293,p < 0.001)。总死亡率 P (a-Et) CO2 的接收器操作特征曲线下面积为 0.604(p < 0.001):P (a-Et) CO2是一个简单、易用的指标,作为评估疾病严重程度和预测死亡率的独立标志物,它可能会对患者护理和预后产生影响,尤其是在非呼吸危重症护理情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient as a severity index in critical care.

Background: The arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient (P [a-Et] CO2) reveals the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) status of critically ill patients. V/Q mismatch has several causes and affects the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. We investigated the relationship between P (a-Et) CO2 and the clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

Methods: Critically ill patients (n = 1,978) on mechanical ventilation and capnography in the intensive care units of two institutions were enrolled and categorized into three groups: P (a-Et) CO2 ≤10 mmHg (low group), 10 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO2 ≤ 20 mmHg (medium group), and 20 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO2 (high group).

Results: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 29.5 ± 8.1, 31.3 ± 8.2, and 33.3 ± 8.7 in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall mortality rates were 25.5 %, 35.6 %, and 52.8 % in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The odds ratio was 1.456 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.117-1.897, p = 0.002) and 2.320 (95 % CI: 1.635-3.293, p < 0.001) for the medium and high groups, respectively, with the low group as a reference. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of P (a-Et) CO2 for overall mortality was 0.604 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: P (a-Et) CO2 is a simple, easily accessible indicator that potentially impacts patient care and outcomes as an independent marker for assessing disease severity and predicting mortality, especially in non-respiratory critical care scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信