骶骨外侧支射频神经切断术治疗双骶骨外侧支阻滞所选患者后骶髂关节复合体疼痛的有效性;一项真实世界队列研究

Austin Boos , Amanda Cooper , Brook Martin , Robert Burnham , Allison Glinka Przybysz , Aaron M. Conger , Zachary L. McCormick , Taylor R. Burnham
{"title":"骶骨外侧支射频神经切断术治疗双骶骨外侧支阻滞所选患者后骶髂关节复合体疼痛的有效性;一项真实世界队列研究","authors":"Austin Boos ,&nbsp;Amanda Cooper ,&nbsp;Brook Martin ,&nbsp;Robert Burnham ,&nbsp;Allison Glinka Przybysz ,&nbsp;Aaron M. Conger ,&nbsp;Zachary L. McCormick ,&nbsp;Taylor R. Burnham","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction following dual sacral lateral branch blocks (SLBB).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate the effectiveness of SLBRFN in patients with ≥80 % pain relief following dual SLBBs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective single-arm cohort study of consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal and pain clinics who underwent first-time SLBRFN after report of ≥80 % pain relief following dual diagnostic SLBBs. Patients were identified by electronic medical record query between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with a ≥50 % reduction in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score three months after SLBRFN. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of responders achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the pain disability quality-of-life questionnaire (PDQQ), and the duration and mean percentage of pain relief among those with recurrent symptoms after a successful SLBRFN.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 70 participants included, 32 (45.7 %; 95 % CI = 34.6–57.3) reported a ≥50 % reduction in NPRS, and 35 (50.0 %; 95 % CI = 38.6–61.4) achieved the MCID on the PDQQ at 3-months. Among the 17 patients who reported a return of symptoms, the mean duration of relief was 8.0 ± 3.5 months, and the mean percentage of pain relief was 77.9 % ± 16.4 %. Logistic regression models revealed that the use of multi-tined RF probes and lower patient BMI were associated with treatment success.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion/conclusion</h3><div>SLBRFN reduced pain and disability in approximately 50 % of patients at 3 months when selected using relatively restrictive selection criteria. Treatment success was associated with multi-tined RF probe type and lower patient BMI. Larger prospective studies assessing long-term outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of different selection criteria and techniques on SLBRFN effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Austin Boos ,&nbsp;Amanda Cooper ,&nbsp;Brook Martin ,&nbsp;Robert Burnham ,&nbsp;Allison Glinka Przybysz ,&nbsp;Aaron M. Conger ,&nbsp;Zachary L. McCormick ,&nbsp;Taylor R. Burnham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction following dual sacral lateral branch blocks (SLBB).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate the effectiveness of SLBRFN in patients with ≥80 % pain relief following dual SLBBs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective single-arm cohort study of consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal and pain clinics who underwent first-time SLBRFN after report of ≥80 % pain relief following dual diagnostic SLBBs. Patients were identified by electronic medical record query between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with a ≥50 % reduction in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score three months after SLBRFN. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of responders achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the pain disability quality-of-life questionnaire (PDQQ), and the duration and mean percentage of pain relief among those with recurrent symptoms after a successful SLBRFN.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 70 participants included, 32 (45.7 %; 95 % CI = 34.6–57.3) reported a ≥50 % reduction in NPRS, and 35 (50.0 %; 95 % CI = 38.6–61.4) achieved the MCID on the PDQQ at 3-months. Among the 17 patients who reported a return of symptoms, the mean duration of relief was 8.0 ± 3.5 months, and the mean percentage of pain relief was 77.9 % ± 16.4 %. Logistic regression models revealed that the use of multi-tined RF probes and lower patient BMI were associated with treatment success.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion/conclusion</h3><div>SLBRFN reduced pain and disability in approximately 50 % of patients at 3 months when selected using relatively restrictive selection criteria. Treatment success was associated with multi-tined RF probe type and lower patient BMI. Larger prospective studies assessing long-term outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of different selection criteria and techniques on SLBRFN effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景以往对脊柱神经切除术的研究表明,严格的阻滞选择可提高疗效。然而,骶骨侧支射频神经切断术(SLBRFN)尚未建立这种模式。很少有 SLBRFN 研究使用严格的阻滞选择标准,如双骶骨侧支阻滞 (SLBB) 后疼痛缓解率≥80%。方法对来自加拿大两家肌肉骨骼和疼痛诊所的连续患者进行回顾性单臂队列研究,这些患者在报告双诊断性 SLBB 后疼痛缓解率≥80%,并首次接受了 SLBRFN。患者是在 2016 年至 2022 年期间通过电子病历查询确定的。主要结果是 SLBRFN 三个月后数字疼痛评分量表 (NPRS) 评分降低≥50%的患者比例。次要结果包括在疼痛残疾生活质量问卷(PDQQ)上达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的应答者比例,以及在成功实施 SLBRFN 后症状复发者的疼痛缓解持续时间和平均百分比。结果 在纳入的 70 名参与者中,32 人(45.7%;95% CI = 34.6-57.3)报告 NPRS 下降≥50%,35 人(50.0%;95% CI = 38.6-61.4)在 3 个月后达到 PDQQ 的 MCID。在报告症状复发的 17 名患者中,平均缓解时间为 8.0 ± 3.5 个月,平均疼痛缓解百分比为 77.9 % ± 16.4 %。逻辑回归模型显示,使用多针射频探针和患者体重指数较低与治疗成功率有关。讨论/结论SLBRFN在使用相对严格的选择标准时,可在3个月时减少约50%患者的疼痛和残疾。治疗成功与多针射频探头类型和患者体重指数较低有关。需要对长期疗效进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以进一步评估不同选择标准和技术对 SLBRFN 效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study

Background

Previous study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction following dual sacral lateral branch blocks (SLBB).

Objective

Evaluate the effectiveness of SLBRFN in patients with ≥80 % pain relief following dual SLBBs.

Methods

Retrospective single-arm cohort study of consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal and pain clinics who underwent first-time SLBRFN after report of ≥80 % pain relief following dual diagnostic SLBBs. Patients were identified by electronic medical record query between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with a ≥50 % reduction in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score three months after SLBRFN. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of responders achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the pain disability quality-of-life questionnaire (PDQQ), and the duration and mean percentage of pain relief among those with recurrent symptoms after a successful SLBRFN.

Results

Of the 70 participants included, 32 (45.7 %; 95 % CI = 34.6–57.3) reported a ≥50 % reduction in NPRS, and 35 (50.0 %; 95 % CI = 38.6–61.4) achieved the MCID on the PDQQ at 3-months. Among the 17 patients who reported a return of symptoms, the mean duration of relief was 8.0 ± 3.5 months, and the mean percentage of pain relief was 77.9 % ± 16.4 %. Logistic regression models revealed that the use of multi-tined RF probes and lower patient BMI were associated with treatment success.

Discussion/conclusion

SLBRFN reduced pain and disability in approximately 50 % of patients at 3 months when selected using relatively restrictive selection criteria. Treatment success was associated with multi-tined RF probe type and lower patient BMI. Larger prospective studies assessing long-term outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of different selection criteria and techniques on SLBRFN effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信