{"title":"解码算法疲劳:算法素养、信息茧和算法不透明的作用","authors":"Hui Yang, Dan Li, Peng Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Algorithmic technologies are dominating our online experiences, from content recommendations to personalized services. However, it also introduces a new challenge: algorithm fatigue. Algorithm fatigue describes the phenomenon where users experience mental and emotional exhaustion in prolonged interaction with algorithms. To decode this phenomenon, we explored personal and technical antecedents of algorithm fatigue and its impact on user behavior. Using data collected from 393 users of algorithm-driven applications, we identified three key drivers of algorithm fatigue: algorithmic literacy (understanding how algorithms work), information cocoons (being exposed to repetitive content), and algorithmic opacity (a lack of transparency in how algorithms make decisions). Interestingly, while greater algorithmic literacy is often thought to enhance user satisfaction, our findings suggest it actually exacerbates fatigue. Both information cocoons and algorithmic opacity also contribute to algorithm fatigue, highlighting the need for diverse content and transparent algorithm designs. Additionally, we found a strong link between algorithm fatigue and resistance behavior, with fatigued users more likely to resist algorithmic recommendations. Overall, this study suggests developers and policymakers design more user-centric algorithms that not only excel in personalization but also reduce potential fatigue and resistance in algorithmic interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102749"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding algorithm fatigue: The role of algorithmic literacy, information cocoons, and algorithmic opacity\",\"authors\":\"Hui Yang, Dan Li, Peng Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Algorithmic technologies are dominating our online experiences, from content recommendations to personalized services. However, it also introduces a new challenge: algorithm fatigue. Algorithm fatigue describes the phenomenon where users experience mental and emotional exhaustion in prolonged interaction with algorithms. To decode this phenomenon, we explored personal and technical antecedents of algorithm fatigue and its impact on user behavior. Using data collected from 393 users of algorithm-driven applications, we identified three key drivers of algorithm fatigue: algorithmic literacy (understanding how algorithms work), information cocoons (being exposed to repetitive content), and algorithmic opacity (a lack of transparency in how algorithms make decisions). Interestingly, while greater algorithmic literacy is often thought to enhance user satisfaction, our findings suggest it actually exacerbates fatigue. Both information cocoons and algorithmic opacity also contribute to algorithm fatigue, highlighting the need for diverse content and transparent algorithm designs. Additionally, we found a strong link between algorithm fatigue and resistance behavior, with fatigued users more likely to resist algorithmic recommendations. Overall, this study suggests developers and policymakers design more user-centric algorithms that not only excel in personalization but also reduce potential fatigue and resistance in algorithmic interactions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002975\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decoding algorithm fatigue: The role of algorithmic literacy, information cocoons, and algorithmic opacity
Algorithmic technologies are dominating our online experiences, from content recommendations to personalized services. However, it also introduces a new challenge: algorithm fatigue. Algorithm fatigue describes the phenomenon where users experience mental and emotional exhaustion in prolonged interaction with algorithms. To decode this phenomenon, we explored personal and technical antecedents of algorithm fatigue and its impact on user behavior. Using data collected from 393 users of algorithm-driven applications, we identified three key drivers of algorithm fatigue: algorithmic literacy (understanding how algorithms work), information cocoons (being exposed to repetitive content), and algorithmic opacity (a lack of transparency in how algorithms make decisions). Interestingly, while greater algorithmic literacy is often thought to enhance user satisfaction, our findings suggest it actually exacerbates fatigue. Both information cocoons and algorithmic opacity also contribute to algorithm fatigue, highlighting the need for diverse content and transparent algorithm designs. Additionally, we found a strong link between algorithm fatigue and resistance behavior, with fatigued users more likely to resist algorithmic recommendations. Overall, this study suggests developers and policymakers design more user-centric algorithms that not only excel in personalization but also reduce potential fatigue and resistance in algorithmic interactions.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.