部分标签环境下基于强化学习的信念函数欺骗性证据检测

IF 7.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Yuhang Chang , Junhao Pan , Xuan Zhao , Bingyi Kang
{"title":"部分标签环境下基于强化学习的信念函数欺骗性证据检测","authors":"Yuhang Chang ,&nbsp;Junhao Pan ,&nbsp;Xuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Bingyi Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Counter-deception evidence fusion is a critical issue in the application of Dempster–Shafer Theory (DST). Effectively detecting deceptive evidence poses a significant challenge in DST-based information fusion. Existing research on this topic is limited and often lacks a clear distinction between deceptive and credible evidence. Recently, two explicit definitions of deceptive evidence have been proposed to address different scenarios: one for cases with label information and another for cases without. However, these definitions are somewhat counter-intuitive and do not address situations where partial label information is available.</div><div>To address this gap, our paper introduces a new, explicit definition of deceptive evidence that considers both the characteristics of the evidence and the fusion system. This definition encompasses cases including with label information, without label information, and with partial label information. It extends the two previously mentioned definitions and, in certain circumstances, aligns with them.</div><div>Based on our new definition, we propose a mathematical model for counter-deception evidence fusion across these three scenarios and apply reinforcement learning to solve it. We present several numerical simulations, a data-driven counter-deception test, and a practical application to demonstrate that our method outperforms previous approaches in both detecting deceptive evidence and in practical applications, showcasing superior effectiveness and robustness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49939,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge-Based Systems","volume":"305 ","pages":"Article 112623"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deceptive evidence detection of belief functions based on reinforcement learning in partial label environment\",\"authors\":\"Yuhang Chang ,&nbsp;Junhao Pan ,&nbsp;Xuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Bingyi Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Counter-deception evidence fusion is a critical issue in the application of Dempster–Shafer Theory (DST). Effectively detecting deceptive evidence poses a significant challenge in DST-based information fusion. Existing research on this topic is limited and often lacks a clear distinction between deceptive and credible evidence. Recently, two explicit definitions of deceptive evidence have been proposed to address different scenarios: one for cases with label information and another for cases without. However, these definitions are somewhat counter-intuitive and do not address situations where partial label information is available.</div><div>To address this gap, our paper introduces a new, explicit definition of deceptive evidence that considers both the characteristics of the evidence and the fusion system. This definition encompasses cases including with label information, without label information, and with partial label information. It extends the two previously mentioned definitions and, in certain circumstances, aligns with them.</div><div>Based on our new definition, we propose a mathematical model for counter-deception evidence fusion across these three scenarios and apply reinforcement learning to solve it. We present several numerical simulations, a data-driven counter-deception test, and a practical application to demonstrate that our method outperforms previous approaches in both detecting deceptive evidence and in practical applications, showcasing superior effectiveness and robustness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowledge-Based Systems\",\"volume\":\"305 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowledge-Based Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705124012577\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705124012577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反欺骗证据融合是 Dempster-Shafer 理论(DST)应用中的一个关键问题。在基于 DST 的信息融合中,有效检测欺骗性证据是一项重大挑战。现有的相关研究十分有限,而且往往缺乏对欺骗性证据和可信证据的明确区分。最近,针对不同情况提出了两种明确的欺骗性证据定义:一种适用于有标签信息的情况,另一种适用于无标签信息的情况。为了弥补这一缺陷,我们的论文引入了一个新的、明确的欺骗性证据定义,该定义同时考虑了证据和融合系统的特征。该定义包括有标签信息、无标签信息和有部分标签信息的情况。基于我们的新定义,我们提出了一个在这三种情况下进行反欺骗证据融合的数学模型,并应用强化学习来解决这个问题。我们提出了几个数值模拟、一个数据驱动的反欺骗测试和一个实际应用,以证明我们的方法在检测欺骗证据和实际应用方面都优于以前的方法,展示了卓越的有效性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deceptive evidence detection of belief functions based on reinforcement learning in partial label environment
Counter-deception evidence fusion is a critical issue in the application of Dempster–Shafer Theory (DST). Effectively detecting deceptive evidence poses a significant challenge in DST-based information fusion. Existing research on this topic is limited and often lacks a clear distinction between deceptive and credible evidence. Recently, two explicit definitions of deceptive evidence have been proposed to address different scenarios: one for cases with label information and another for cases without. However, these definitions are somewhat counter-intuitive and do not address situations where partial label information is available.
To address this gap, our paper introduces a new, explicit definition of deceptive evidence that considers both the characteristics of the evidence and the fusion system. This definition encompasses cases including with label information, without label information, and with partial label information. It extends the two previously mentioned definitions and, in certain circumstances, aligns with them.
Based on our new definition, we propose a mathematical model for counter-deception evidence fusion across these three scenarios and apply reinforcement learning to solve it. We present several numerical simulations, a data-driven counter-deception test, and a practical application to demonstrate that our method outperforms previous approaches in both detecting deceptive evidence and in practical applications, showcasing superior effectiveness and robustness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Knowledge-Based Systems
Knowledge-Based Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1245
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: Knowledge-Based Systems, an international and interdisciplinary journal in artificial intelligence, publishes original, innovative, and creative research results in the field. It focuses on knowledge-based and other artificial intelligence techniques-based systems. The journal aims to support human prediction and decision-making through data science and computation techniques, provide a balanced coverage of theory and practical study, and encourage the development and implementation of knowledge-based intelligence models, methods, systems, and software tools. Applications in business, government, education, engineering, and healthcare are emphasized.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信