Maria Valentim, João Barbosa, Mariana Almeida, Sara Alves, Helena Salgado
{"title":"优化患者安全:揭示袖带压力在麻醉中的重要性","authors":"Maria Valentim, João Barbosa, Mariana Almeida, Sara Alves, Helena Salgado","doi":"10.1016/j.tacc.2024.101493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inadequate pressure in the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff can lead to compromised ventilation or airway injury. Accurate assessment of ETT cuff pressure is essential and should be performed using a manometer, with an optimal target range of 20–30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>In this study, we aimed to audit ETT cuff pressures in the operating theatre of our institution, utilizing a manometer from VBM Medizintechnik GmbH™.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following approval from the ethics committee, we conducted an audit from January 2023 to November 2023. A convenience sample was utilized, including adult patients who were intubated in our operating rooms (ORs) during either the morning or afternoon shifts at the time of the audit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 49 patients were evaluated. Our findings revealed that 78 % of the patients had cuff pressures outside the recommended target range, with recorded pressures ranging from 18 cmH<sub>2</sub>O to 120 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and a mean pressure of 63 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Nitrous oxide was not used in any of the cases. Cuff inflation was performed using different syringe volumes: a 5 mL syringe was used in one case, a 10 mL syringe in 20 cases, and a 20 mL syringe in 28 cases, with a mean inflation volume of 9 mL. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference in ETT cuff pressure related to the type of syringe used or the size of the endotracheal tube. Additionally, no correlation was found between the volume of air used for cuff inflation and the resulting ETT cuff pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our audit revealed that only 22 % of the patients had cuff pressures within the recommended limits, highlighting a significant need for increased awareness and education. As maintaining appropriate cuff pressure is a standard of care, systematic implementation of reliable cuff pressure monitoring is strongly recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44534,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing patient safety: Unveiling the significance of cuff pressure in anaesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Maria Valentim, João Barbosa, Mariana Almeida, Sara Alves, Helena Salgado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tacc.2024.101493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inadequate pressure in the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff can lead to compromised ventilation or airway injury. Accurate assessment of ETT cuff pressure is essential and should be performed using a manometer, with an optimal target range of 20–30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>In this study, we aimed to audit ETT cuff pressures in the operating theatre of our institution, utilizing a manometer from VBM Medizintechnik GmbH™.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following approval from the ethics committee, we conducted an audit from January 2023 to November 2023. A convenience sample was utilized, including adult patients who were intubated in our operating rooms (ORs) during either the morning or afternoon shifts at the time of the audit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 49 patients were evaluated. Our findings revealed that 78 % of the patients had cuff pressures outside the recommended target range, with recorded pressures ranging from 18 cmH<sub>2</sub>O to 120 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and a mean pressure of 63 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Nitrous oxide was not used in any of the cases. Cuff inflation was performed using different syringe volumes: a 5 mL syringe was used in one case, a 10 mL syringe in 20 cases, and a 20 mL syringe in 28 cases, with a mean inflation volume of 9 mL. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference in ETT cuff pressure related to the type of syringe used or the size of the endotracheal tube. Additionally, no correlation was found between the volume of air used for cuff inflation and the resulting ETT cuff pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our audit revealed that only 22 % of the patients had cuff pressures within the recommended limits, highlighting a significant need for increased awareness and education. As maintaining appropriate cuff pressure is a standard of care, systematic implementation of reliable cuff pressure monitoring is strongly recommended.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221084402400162X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221084402400162X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景气管导管(ETT)袖带压力不足会导致通气功能受损或气道损伤。准确评估 ETT 袖带压力至关重要,应使用压力计进行评估,最佳目标范围为 20-30 cmH2O.Aim在本研究中,我们使用 VBM Medizintechnik GmbH™ 公司生产的压力计对本机构手术室的 ETT 袖带压力进行了审核。我们采用的是方便抽样法,抽样对象包括审核时在我们手术室(OR)上下午班插管的成年患者。我们的结果显示,78% 的患者的袖带压力超出了推荐的目标范围,记录的压力范围为 18 cmH2O 至 120 cmH2O,平均压力为 63 cmH2O。所有病例均未使用一氧化二氮。使用不同容量的注射器进行袖带充气:1 例使用 5 mL 注射器,20 例使用 10 mL 注射器,28 例使用 20 mL 注射器,平均充气量为 9 mL。统计分析表明,ETT 袖套压力的差异与使用的注射器类型或气管导管的大小没有明显关系。结论我们的审计结果表明,只有 22% 的患者的充气罩囊压力在建议范围内,这表明有必要加强宣传和教育。由于保持适当的充气罩囊压是一项护理标准,因此强烈建议系统地实施可靠的充气罩囊压监测。
Optimizing patient safety: Unveiling the significance of cuff pressure in anaesthesia
Background
Inadequate pressure in the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff can lead to compromised ventilation or airway injury. Accurate assessment of ETT cuff pressure is essential and should be performed using a manometer, with an optimal target range of 20–30 cmH2O.
Aim
In this study, we aimed to audit ETT cuff pressures in the operating theatre of our institution, utilizing a manometer from VBM Medizintechnik GmbH™.
Methods
Following approval from the ethics committee, we conducted an audit from January 2023 to November 2023. A convenience sample was utilized, including adult patients who were intubated in our operating rooms (ORs) during either the morning or afternoon shifts at the time of the audit.
Results
A total of 49 patients were evaluated. Our findings revealed that 78 % of the patients had cuff pressures outside the recommended target range, with recorded pressures ranging from 18 cmH2O to 120 cmH2O, and a mean pressure of 63 cmH2O. Nitrous oxide was not used in any of the cases. Cuff inflation was performed using different syringe volumes: a 5 mL syringe was used in one case, a 10 mL syringe in 20 cases, and a 20 mL syringe in 28 cases, with a mean inflation volume of 9 mL. Statistical analysis indicated no significant difference in ETT cuff pressure related to the type of syringe used or the size of the endotracheal tube. Additionally, no correlation was found between the volume of air used for cuff inflation and the resulting ETT cuff pressure.
Conclusion
Our audit revealed that only 22 % of the patients had cuff pressures within the recommended limits, highlighting a significant need for increased awareness and education. As maintaining appropriate cuff pressure is a standard of care, systematic implementation of reliable cuff pressure monitoring is strongly recommended.