肥胖患者的有骨水泥与无骨水泥初级全膝关节置换术:系统回顾

Jordan G Tropf, Timothy P Murphy, Emily Shohfi, John P Cody, Robert W Tracey
{"title":"肥胖患者的有骨水泥与无骨水泥初级全膝关节置换术:系统回顾","authors":"Jordan G Tropf, Timothy P Murphy, Emily Shohfi, John P Cody, Robert W Tracey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > 30) is associated with increased complications. There is a renewed interest in cementless fixation in obese patients. However, the ideal method of TKA fixation in obese patients remains unclear. The literature was systematically reviewed to evaluate survivorship and functional outcomes of cemented versus cementless TKAs performed in obese patients. Complications, revision rates, and patient-reported functional outcomes were examined in studies comparing cemented and cementless fixation methods. Five articles met inclusion criteria to be included in the review. The cementless cohort had lower revision rates in two included studies but no difference in the three other studies examined. Functional outcomes were inconsistently reported. Overlap of patient cohorts and heterogeneity in reporting of functional outcomes precluded a pooled metaanalysis. Cementless TKA may have lower revision rates and better functional outcomes in obese patients, but paucity of data and inconsistency in reporting of functional outcomes prevents definitive conclusions. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):189-195, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"33 3","pages":"189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cemented Versus Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan G Tropf, Timothy P Murphy, Emily Shohfi, John P Cody, Robert W Tracey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > 30) is associated with increased complications. There is a renewed interest in cementless fixation in obese patients. However, the ideal method of TKA fixation in obese patients remains unclear. The literature was systematically reviewed to evaluate survivorship and functional outcomes of cemented versus cementless TKAs performed in obese patients. Complications, revision rates, and patient-reported functional outcomes were examined in studies comparing cemented and cementless fixation methods. Five articles met inclusion criteria to be included in the review. The cementless cohort had lower revision rates in two included studies but no difference in the three other studies examined. Functional outcomes were inconsistently reported. Overlap of patient cohorts and heterogeneity in reporting of functional outcomes precluded a pooled metaanalysis. Cementless TKA may have lower revision rates and better functional outcomes in obese patients, but paucity of data and inconsistency in reporting of functional outcomes prevents definitive conclusions. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):189-195, 2024).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"189-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖患者(体重指数 [BMI] > 30)进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)会增加并发症。人们对肥胖患者的无骨水泥固定重新产生了兴趣。然而,肥胖患者 TKA 固定的理想方法仍不明确。我们系统地回顾了相关文献,以评估肥胖患者接受有骨水泥与无骨水泥 TKA 的存活率和功能结果。在比较有骨水泥和无骨水泥固定方法的研究中,对并发症、翻修率和患者报告的功能结果进行了研究。五篇文章符合纳入标准,被纳入综述。在纳入的两项研究中,无骨水泥固定组的翻修率较低,但在其他三项研究中没有差异。功能结果的报告不一致。患者队列的重叠和功能结果报告的异质性导致无法进行汇总荟萃分析。无骨水泥 TKA 可能会降低肥胖患者的翻修率并改善其功能预后,但数据的匮乏和功能预后报告的不一致阻碍了最终结论的得出。(外科骨科进展杂志》33(3):189-195,2024)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cemented Versus Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > 30) is associated with increased complications. There is a renewed interest in cementless fixation in obese patients. However, the ideal method of TKA fixation in obese patients remains unclear. The literature was systematically reviewed to evaluate survivorship and functional outcomes of cemented versus cementless TKAs performed in obese patients. Complications, revision rates, and patient-reported functional outcomes were examined in studies comparing cemented and cementless fixation methods. Five articles met inclusion criteria to be included in the review. The cementless cohort had lower revision rates in two included studies but no difference in the three other studies examined. Functional outcomes were inconsistently reported. Overlap of patient cohorts and heterogeneity in reporting of functional outcomes precluded a pooled metaanalysis. Cementless TKA may have lower revision rates and better functional outcomes in obese patients, but paucity of data and inconsistency in reporting of functional outcomes prevents definitive conclusions. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):189-195, 2024).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信