中东和北非地区化学、生物、辐射和核事故的准备和应对战略:人工智能增强德尔菲法》。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hassan Farhat, Guillaume Alinier, Nidaa Bajow, Alan Batt, Mariana Charbel Helou, Craig Campbell, Heejun Shin, Luc Mortelmans, Arezoo Dehghani, Carolyn Dumbeck, Roberto Mugavero, Walid Abougalala, Saida Zelfani, James Laughton, Gregory Ciottone, Mohamed Ben Dhiab
{"title":"中东和北非地区化学、生物、辐射和核事故的准备和应对战略:人工智能增强德尔菲法》。","authors":"Hassan Farhat, Guillaume Alinier, Nidaa Bajow, Alan Batt, Mariana Charbel Helou, Craig Campbell, Heejun Shin, Luc Mortelmans, Arezoo Dehghani, Carolyn Dumbeck, Roberto Mugavero, Walid Abougalala, Saida Zelfani, James Laughton, Gregory Ciottone, Mohamed Ben Dhiab","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2024.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) incidents require meticulous preparedness, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study evaluated CBRN response operational flowcharts, tabletop training scenarios methods, and a health sector preparedness assessment tool specific to the MENA region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online Delphi survey engaging international disaster medicine experts was conducted. Content validity indices (CVIs) were used to validate the items. Consensus metrics, including interquartile ranges (IQRs) and Kendall's W coefficient, were utilized to assess the panelists' agreement levels. Advanced artificial intelligence computing methods, including sentiment analysis and machine-learning methods (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding [t-SNE] and k-means), were used to cluster the consensus data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty experts participated in this study. The item-level CVIs for the CBRN response flowcharts, preparedness assessment tool, and tabletop scenarios were 0.96, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively, indicating strong content validity. Consensus analysis demonstrated an IQR of 0 for most items and a strong Kendall's W coefficient, indicating a high level of agreement among the panelists. The t-SNE and k-means identified four clusters with greater European response engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated essential CBRN preparedness and response tools using broad expert consensus, demonstrating their applicability across different geographic areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":"18 ","pages":"e244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparedness and Response Strategies for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Incidents in the Middle East and North Africa: An Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Delphi Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Farhat, Guillaume Alinier, Nidaa Bajow, Alan Batt, Mariana Charbel Helou, Craig Campbell, Heejun Shin, Luc Mortelmans, Arezoo Dehghani, Carolyn Dumbeck, Roberto Mugavero, Walid Abougalala, Saida Zelfani, James Laughton, Gregory Ciottone, Mohamed Ben Dhiab\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/dmp.2024.160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) incidents require meticulous preparedness, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study evaluated CBRN response operational flowcharts, tabletop training scenarios methods, and a health sector preparedness assessment tool specific to the MENA region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online Delphi survey engaging international disaster medicine experts was conducted. Content validity indices (CVIs) were used to validate the items. Consensus metrics, including interquartile ranges (IQRs) and Kendall's W coefficient, were utilized to assess the panelists' agreement levels. Advanced artificial intelligence computing methods, including sentiment analysis and machine-learning methods (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding [t-SNE] and k-means), were used to cluster the consensus data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty experts participated in this study. The item-level CVIs for the CBRN response flowcharts, preparedness assessment tool, and tabletop scenarios were 0.96, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively, indicating strong content validity. Consensus analysis demonstrated an IQR of 0 for most items and a strong Kendall's W coefficient, indicating a high level of agreement among the panelists. The t-SNE and k-means identified four clusters with greater European response engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated essential CBRN preparedness and response tools using broad expert consensus, demonstrating their applicability across different geographic areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"e244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:化学、生物、辐射和核(CBRN)事件需要精心准备,尤其是在中东和北非地区。本研究评估了针对中东和北非地区的化学、生物、辐射及核(CBRN)响应操作流程图、桌面培训情景模拟方法和卫生部门准备情况评估工具:方法:邀请国际灾难医学专家进行在线德尔菲调查。采用内容效度指数(CVI)对项目进行验证。共识度量,包括四分位数间距 (IQR) 和 Kendall's W 系数,用于评估专家小组成员的一致程度。先进的人工智能计算方法,包括情感分析和机器学习方法(t-分布随机邻域嵌入[t-SNE]和k-均值),被用来对共识数据进行聚类:结果:40 位专家参与了这项研究。CBRN 响应流程图、备灾评估工具和桌面情景的项目级 CVI 分别为 0.96、0.85 和 0.84,表明内容具有很强的有效性。共识分析表明,大多数项目的 IQR 为 0,Kendall's W 系数很高,表明专家小组成员之间的意见高度一致。t-SNE 和 k-means 确定了四个欧洲人参与度较高的群组:这项研究利用广泛的专家共识验证了基本的化学、生物、辐射和核准备与响应工具,证明了它们在不同地理区域的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preparedness and Response Strategies for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Incidents in the Middle East and North Africa: An Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Delphi Approach.

Objective: Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) incidents require meticulous preparedness, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study evaluated CBRN response operational flowcharts, tabletop training scenarios methods, and a health sector preparedness assessment tool specific to the MENA region.

Methods: An online Delphi survey engaging international disaster medicine experts was conducted. Content validity indices (CVIs) were used to validate the items. Consensus metrics, including interquartile ranges (IQRs) and Kendall's W coefficient, were utilized to assess the panelists' agreement levels. Advanced artificial intelligence computing methods, including sentiment analysis and machine-learning methods (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding [t-SNE] and k-means), were used to cluster the consensus data.

Results: Forty experts participated in this study. The item-level CVIs for the CBRN response flowcharts, preparedness assessment tool, and tabletop scenarios were 0.96, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively, indicating strong content validity. Consensus analysis demonstrated an IQR of 0 for most items and a strong Kendall's W coefficient, indicating a high level of agreement among the panelists. The t-SNE and k-means identified four clusters with greater European response engagement.

Conclusions: This study validated essential CBRN preparedness and response tools using broad expert consensus, demonstrating their applicability across different geographic areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信