在对慢性腰痛患者进行认知功能治疗期间,前屈能力的改善与疼痛和残疾的改善有关。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ruth Chang, Amity Campbell, Peter Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, Mark Hancock, Lesa Hoffman, Alison McGregor, Robert Laird, Anne Smith
{"title":"在对慢性腰痛患者进行认知功能治疗期间,前屈能力的改善与疼痛和残疾的改善有关。","authors":"Ruth Chang, Amity Campbell, Peter Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, Mark Hancock, Lesa Hoffman, Alison McGregor, Robert Laird, Anne Smith","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to improvements in pain and disability in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT). <b>DESIGN:</b> Longitudinal observational study. <b>METHODS:</b> Two hundred and sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (an average of 4.3 timepoints per participant [range, 1-8]). Spinal range of motion (ROM) and velocity were recorded using 2 inertial measurement units located at T12 and S2. Participants reported (1) average pain intensity (0-10 scale) (pain) and (2) pain-related activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [disability]) via online questionnaires at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate multilevel models were used to evaluate associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, lumbar ROM) and pain/disability. <b>RESULTS:</b> Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced pain (<i>r =</i> -0.81; 95% CI: -0.98, -0.05) and with reduced disability (<i>r</i> = -0.77; 95% CI: -0.95, -0.22). Moderate correlations were observed between increased trunk ROM with reduced pain (<i>r = -</i>0.37; 95% CI: -0.67, 0.04) and with reduced disability (<i>r = -</i>0.32; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.03). There was no evidence of association between changes in lumbar ROM and pain (<i>r = -</i>0.46; 95% CI: -0.90, 0.44) or disability (<i>r = -</i>0.01; 95% CI: -0.56, 0.55). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Reductions in pain and disability were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains \"nonprotective\" spinal movement. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):721-731. Epub 7 October 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12727</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"54 11","pages":"721-731"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvements in Forward Bending Are Related to Improvements in Pain and Disability During Cognitive Functional Therapy for People With Chronic Low Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Chang, Amity Campbell, Peter Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, Mark Hancock, Lesa Hoffman, Alison McGregor, Robert Laird, Anne Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2024.12727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to improvements in pain and disability in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT). <b>DESIGN:</b> Longitudinal observational study. <b>METHODS:</b> Two hundred and sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (an average of 4.3 timepoints per participant [range, 1-8]). Spinal range of motion (ROM) and velocity were recorded using 2 inertial measurement units located at T12 and S2. Participants reported (1) average pain intensity (0-10 scale) (pain) and (2) pain-related activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [disability]) via online questionnaires at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate multilevel models were used to evaluate associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, lumbar ROM) and pain/disability. <b>RESULTS:</b> Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced pain (<i>r =</i> -0.81; 95% CI: -0.98, -0.05) and with reduced disability (<i>r</i> = -0.77; 95% CI: -0.95, -0.22). Moderate correlations were observed between increased trunk ROM with reduced pain (<i>r = -</i>0.37; 95% CI: -0.67, 0.04) and with reduced disability (<i>r = -</i>0.32; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.03). There was no evidence of association between changes in lumbar ROM and pain (<i>r = -</i>0.46; 95% CI: -0.90, 0.44) or disability (<i>r = -</i>0.01; 95% CI: -0.56, 0.55). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Reductions in pain and disability were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains \\\"nonprotective\\\" spinal movement. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):721-731. Epub 7 October 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12727</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"54 11\",\"pages\":\"721-731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12727\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究正在接受认知功能疗法(CFT)治疗的慢性腰背痛(CLBP)患者的前屈改善是否与疼痛和残疾的改善有关。设计:纵向观察研究。方法:261 名慢性腰背痛患者接受了认知功能疗法。在为期 13 周的每个疗程中对前屈进行评估(每位参与者平均接受 4.3 个时间点的评估[范围为 1-8])。使用位于 T12 和 S2 的 2 个惯性测量单元记录脊柱运动范围 (ROM) 和速度。参与者在 0、3、6 和 13 周时通过在线问卷报告(1)平均疼痛强度(0-10 级)(疼痛)和(2)与疼痛相关的活动限制(罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷[残疾])。多变量多层次模型用于评估 3 种脊柱运动测量指标(躯干速度、躯干 ROM、腰椎 ROM)的个体随时间变化率与疼痛/残疾之间的关联。结果:观察到躯干速度增加与疼痛减轻(r = -0.81;95% CI:-0.98,-0.05)和残疾减轻(r = -0.77;95% CI:-0.95,-0.22)之间存在很强的相关性。躯干 ROM 增加与疼痛减轻(r = -0.37;95% CI:-0.67,0.04)和残疾减轻(r = -0.32;95% CI:-0.6,0.03)之间存在中度相关性。没有证据表明腰部 ROM 的变化与疼痛(r = -0.46;95% CI:-0.90,0.44)或残疾(r = -0.01;95% CI:-0.56,0.55)有关。结论:在接受 CFT 的慢性肢体疼痛患者中,疼痛和残疾的减轻与躯干速度的增加密切相关。这些发现与明确训练 "非保护性 "脊柱运动的 CFT 是一致的。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):721-731.Doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12727。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improvements in Forward Bending Are Related to Improvements in Pain and Disability During Cognitive Functional Therapy for People With Chronic Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether improvements in forward bending were related to improvements in pain and disability in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who were undergoing Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-one participants with CLBP received CFT. Forward bending was assessed at each treatment session over 13 weeks (an average of 4.3 timepoints per participant [range, 1-8]). Spinal range of motion (ROM) and velocity were recorded using 2 inertial measurement units located at T12 and S2. Participants reported (1) average pain intensity (0-10 scale) (pain) and (2) pain-related activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [disability]) via online questionnaires at 0, 3, 6, and 13 weeks. Multivariate multilevel models were used to evaluate associations between individual rates of change over time for 3 spinal movement measures (trunk velocity, trunk ROM, lumbar ROM) and pain/disability. RESULTS: Strong correlations were observed for increased trunk velocity with reduced pain (r = -0.81; 95% CI: -0.98, -0.05) and with reduced disability (r = -0.77; 95% CI: -0.95, -0.22). Moderate correlations were observed between increased trunk ROM with reduced pain (r = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.67, 0.04) and with reduced disability (r = -0.32; 95% CI: -0.6, 0.03). There was no evidence of association between changes in lumbar ROM and pain (r = -0.46; 95% CI: -0.90, 0.44) or disability (r = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.56, 0.55). CONCLUSION: Reductions in pain and disability were strongly correlated with increased trunk velocity in people with CLBP who were undergoing CFT. These findings are consistent with CFT that explicitly trains "nonprotective" spinal movement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(11):721-731. Epub 7 October 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12727.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信