撤销 Xia 等人(2023 年)撰写的 "大流行病期间家访的影响:来自儿童第一随机对照试验的证据 "一文:来自 "儿童第一 "随机对照试验的证据",作者 Xia 等(2023 年)。

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Samantha Xia, Mervett Hefyan, Meghan P McCormick, Maya Goldberg, Emily Swinth, Sharon Huang
{"title":"撤销 Xia 等人(2023 年)撰写的 \"大流行病期间家访的影响:来自儿童第一随机对照试验的证据 \"一文:来自 \"儿童第一 \"随机对照试验的证据\",作者 Xia 等(2023 年)。","authors":"Samantha Xia, Mervett Hefyan, Meghan P McCormick, Maya Goldberg, Emily Swinth, Sharon Huang","doi":"10.1037/fam0001254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports the retraction of \"Home visiting impacts during the pandemic: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of child first\" by Samantha Xia, Mervett Hefyan, Meghan P. McCormick, Maya Goldberg, Emily Swinth and Sharon Huang (<i>Journal of Family Psychology</i>, 2023[Aug], Vol 37[5], 569-580). This article is being retracted at the request of the publisher, and the editor and all authors of the original article consented. The MDRC study team identified two caregivers who were enrolled at baseline but were, themselves, minors. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-81526-001.) Existing research has found that home visiting programs for families with young children can improve children's development and strengthen caregiver and family well-being. However, the pandemic created numerous challenges for home visiting programs, forcing them to deliver services online or in a hybrid format to respond to pandemic-related challenges. Questions remain about the impacts of these programs when delivered at-scale via a hybrid model, especially during this uniquely challenging time. The present study reports 12-month impacts from a randomized controlled trial of Child First-an evidence-based home visiting program that provides psychotherapeutic, parent-child intervention (children ages 0-5) embedded in a coordinated system of care-when implemented as a hybrid service. This study estimates impacts within four domains: families' receipt of services, caregiver psychological well-being and parenting, child behavior, and family economic well-being. After randomly assigning families (<i>N</i> = 226) to receive Child First or typical community services, the research team surveyed caregivers (<i>N</i> = 183) about a year after study enrollment. Results from regression models with site fixed effects revealed suggestive evidence that Child First reduced caregivers' job loss, residential mobility, and self-reported substance abuse, and increased receipt of virtual services during the pandemic. There were null impacts on caregivers' psychological well-being, families' involvement with the child welfare system, children's behaviors, and other indicators of economic well-being. Implications for future research and policy are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retraction of \\\"Home visiting impacts during the pandemic: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of Child First\\\" by Xia et al. (2023).\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Xia, Mervett Hefyan, Meghan P McCormick, Maya Goldberg, Emily Swinth, Sharon Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fam0001254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reports the retraction of \\\"Home visiting impacts during the pandemic: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of child first\\\" by Samantha Xia, Mervett Hefyan, Meghan P. McCormick, Maya Goldberg, Emily Swinth and Sharon Huang (<i>Journal of Family Psychology</i>, 2023[Aug], Vol 37[5], 569-580). This article is being retracted at the request of the publisher, and the editor and all authors of the original article consented. The MDRC study team identified two caregivers who were enrolled at baseline but were, themselves, minors. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-81526-001.) Existing research has found that home visiting programs for families with young children can improve children's development and strengthen caregiver and family well-being. However, the pandemic created numerous challenges for home visiting programs, forcing them to deliver services online or in a hybrid format to respond to pandemic-related challenges. Questions remain about the impacts of these programs when delivered at-scale via a hybrid model, especially during this uniquely challenging time. The present study reports 12-month impacts from a randomized controlled trial of Child First-an evidence-based home visiting program that provides psychotherapeutic, parent-child intervention (children ages 0-5) embedded in a coordinated system of care-when implemented as a hybrid service. This study estimates impacts within four domains: families' receipt of services, caregiver psychological well-being and parenting, child behavior, and family economic well-being. After randomly assigning families (<i>N</i> = 226) to receive Child First or typical community services, the research team surveyed caregivers (<i>N</i> = 183) about a year after study enrollment. Results from regression models with site fixed effects revealed suggestive evidence that Child First reduced caregivers' job loss, residential mobility, and self-reported substance abuse, and increased receipt of virtual services during the pandemic. There were null impacts on caregivers' psychological well-being, families' involvement with the child welfare system, children's behaviors, and other indicators of economic well-being. Implications for future research and policy are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001254\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

报告撤回 Samantha Xia、Mervett Hefyan、Meghan P. McCormick、Maya Goldberg、Emily Swinth 和 Sharon Huang 所著《大流行病期间家访的影响:Samantha Xia、Mervett Hefyan、Meghan P. McCormick、Maya Goldberg、Emily Swinth 和 Sharon Huang 撰写的 "Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of child first"(《家庭心理学杂志》,2023 年 8 月,第 37 卷[5],569-580 页)。应出版商的要求,本文将被撤回,编辑和原文所有作者均表示同意。MDRC 研究小组发现了两名在基线时注册的护理人员,但他们本身是未成年人。(以下为原文摘要,载于 2023-81526-001 号记录)。现有研究发现,针对幼儿家庭的家访计划可以促进儿童的发展,并增强照顾者和家庭的幸福感。然而,大流行病给家访计划带来了许多挑战,迫使它们通过在线或混合形式提供服务,以应对与大流行病相关的挑战。通过混合模式大规模提供服务时,尤其是在这一极具挑战性的时期,这些计划的影响如何,仍然是个问题。本研究报告了 "儿童第一"(Child First)随机对照试验 12 个月的影响。"儿童第一 "是一项循证家访计划,提供心理治疗、亲子干预(0-5 岁儿童),并将其嵌入到一个协调的护理系统中。本研究估算了四个方面的影响:家庭接受服务的情况、照顾者的心理健康和养育情况、儿童行为以及家庭经济状况。在随机分配家庭(226 个家庭)接受 "儿童第一 "服务或典型社区服务后,研究小组在研究注册约一年后对照顾者(183 个家庭)进行了调查。带有地点固定效应的回归模型结果显示,有提示性证据表明,"儿童第一 "减少了照顾者的失业、居住地流动性和自我报告的药物滥用,并增加了大流行期间接受虚拟服务的次数。对照顾者的心理健康、家庭对儿童福利系统的参与、儿童的行为以及其他经济福利指标的影响为零。本文讨论了对未来研究和政策的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retraction of "Home visiting impacts during the pandemic: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of Child First" by Xia et al. (2023).

Reports the retraction of "Home visiting impacts during the pandemic: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of child first" by Samantha Xia, Mervett Hefyan, Meghan P. McCormick, Maya Goldberg, Emily Swinth and Sharon Huang (Journal of Family Psychology, 2023[Aug], Vol 37[5], 569-580). This article is being retracted at the request of the publisher, and the editor and all authors of the original article consented. The MDRC study team identified two caregivers who were enrolled at baseline but were, themselves, minors. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-81526-001.) Existing research has found that home visiting programs for families with young children can improve children's development and strengthen caregiver and family well-being. However, the pandemic created numerous challenges for home visiting programs, forcing them to deliver services online or in a hybrid format to respond to pandemic-related challenges. Questions remain about the impacts of these programs when delivered at-scale via a hybrid model, especially during this uniquely challenging time. The present study reports 12-month impacts from a randomized controlled trial of Child First-an evidence-based home visiting program that provides psychotherapeutic, parent-child intervention (children ages 0-5) embedded in a coordinated system of care-when implemented as a hybrid service. This study estimates impacts within four domains: families' receipt of services, caregiver psychological well-being and parenting, child behavior, and family economic well-being. After randomly assigning families (N = 226) to receive Child First or typical community services, the research team surveyed caregivers (N = 183) about a year after study enrollment. Results from regression models with site fixed effects revealed suggestive evidence that Child First reduced caregivers' job loss, residential mobility, and self-reported substance abuse, and increased receipt of virtual services during the pandemic. There were null impacts on caregivers' psychological well-being, families' involvement with the child welfare system, children's behaviors, and other indicators of economic well-being. Implications for future research and policy are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信