硫酸镁、利诺卡因和丙泊酚在全身麻醉下进行功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术时减轻血流动力学反应的比较研究:前瞻性随机试验。

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Malipeddi Vamshidhar, Vandana Pakhare, Sunanda Gooty, Ananya Nanda, Ramachandran Gopinath, K Dilip Kumar, Vyshnavi R
{"title":"硫酸镁、利诺卡因和丙泊酚在全身麻醉下进行功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术时减轻血流动力学反应的比较研究:前瞻性随机试验。","authors":"Malipeddi Vamshidhar, Vandana Pakhare, Sunanda Gooty, Ananya Nanda, Ramachandran Gopinath, K Dilip Kumar, Vyshnavi R","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2024.241573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a surgical procedure requiring minimal bleeding to optimize the surgical field. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate, lignocaine, and propofol in attenuating hemodynamic response. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of these agents in reducing hemodynamic response. The secondary objectives included assessing the quality of the surgical field, recovery time, and total neuromuscular dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly allocated 105 patients scheduled for FESS into three groups: lignocaine, propofol, and magnesium sulfate. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded every 5 min for the first 30 min, followed by measurements every 10 min at the end of the procedure. Moreover, recovery time, total neuromuscular blocking dose, and surgical field score were noted upon completion of the procedure. Statistical analysis was conducted using the number cruncher statistical systems version 9.0.8 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three groups showed comparable hemodynamic response and surgical field scores. The recovery time was notably longer in the magnesium sulfate group [10.94 min (2.45)] than in the lignocaine [4.37 min (1.03)] [95% confidence interval (CI) -7.32, -5.83; <i>P</i>=0.000] and propofol groups [4.60 min (0.60)] (95% CI 5.60, 7.095; <i>P</i>=0.000). Moreover, the total neuromuscular blocking agent used was significantly lower in the magnesium sulfate group [5.89 mg (0.47)] than in the lignocaine [6.26 mg (0.56)] (95% CI 0.66, 0.03; <i>P</i>=0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Propofol, magnesium sulfate, and lignocaine exerted equal efficacy in attenuating hemodynamic responses during surgery and ensuring a satisfactory surgical field. However, magnesium sulfate led to significantly longer recovery times compared with propofol and lignocaine. In addition, magnesium sulfate required a significantly lower total dose of neuromuscular blocking agents than lignocaine.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"52 5","pages":"188-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulfate, Lignocaine, and Propofol for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Malipeddi Vamshidhar, Vandana Pakhare, Sunanda Gooty, Ananya Nanda, Ramachandran Gopinath, K Dilip Kumar, Vyshnavi R\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TJAR.2024.241573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a surgical procedure requiring minimal bleeding to optimize the surgical field. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate, lignocaine, and propofol in attenuating hemodynamic response. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of these agents in reducing hemodynamic response. The secondary objectives included assessing the quality of the surgical field, recovery time, and total neuromuscular dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly allocated 105 patients scheduled for FESS into three groups: lignocaine, propofol, and magnesium sulfate. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded every 5 min for the first 30 min, followed by measurements every 10 min at the end of the procedure. Moreover, recovery time, total neuromuscular blocking dose, and surgical field score were noted upon completion of the procedure. Statistical analysis was conducted using the number cruncher statistical systems version 9.0.8 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three groups showed comparable hemodynamic response and surgical field scores. The recovery time was notably longer in the magnesium sulfate group [10.94 min (2.45)] than in the lignocaine [4.37 min (1.03)] [95% confidence interval (CI) -7.32, -5.83; <i>P</i>=0.000] and propofol groups [4.60 min (0.60)] (95% CI 5.60, 7.095; <i>P</i>=0.000). Moreover, the total neuromuscular blocking agent used was significantly lower in the magnesium sulfate group [5.89 mg (0.47)] than in the lignocaine [6.26 mg (0.56)] (95% CI 0.66, 0.03; <i>P</i>=0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Propofol, magnesium sulfate, and lignocaine exerted equal efficacy in attenuating hemodynamic responses during surgery and ensuring a satisfactory surgical field. However, magnesium sulfate led to significantly longer recovery times compared with propofol and lignocaine. In addition, magnesium sulfate required a significantly lower total dose of neuromuscular blocking agents than lignocaine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"volume\":\"52 5\",\"pages\":\"188-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2024.241573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2024.241573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)是一种需要尽量减少出血以优化手术视野的外科手术。本研究旨在评估硫酸镁、木质素卡因和异丙酚在减轻血流动力学反应方面的效果。本研究的首要目标是比较这些药物在减轻血流动力学反应方面的功效。次要目标包括评估手术野的质量、恢复时间和神经肌肉总剂量:我们将 105 名计划接受 FESS 的患者随机分为三组:木质素组、异丙酚组和硫酸镁组。前 30 分钟每 5 分钟记录一次心率和平均动脉压,手术结束后每 10 分钟测量一次心率和平均动脉压。此外,手术结束后还记录了恢复时间、神经肌肉阻断总剂量和手术视野评分。统计分析使用 number cruncher 统计系统 9.0.8 版软件进行:结果:三组患者的血流动力学反应和手术视野评分相当。硫酸镁组的恢复时间[10.94 分钟(2.45)]明显长于木质素组[4.37 分钟(1.03)][95% 置信区间(CI)-7.32,-5.83;P=0.000]和异丙酚组[4.60 分钟(0.60)](95% CI 5.60,7.095;P=0.000)。此外,硫酸镁组[5.89 毫克(0.47)]的神经肌肉阻断剂总用量显著低于木质素组[6.26 毫克(0.56)](95% CI 0.66,0.03;P=0.035):结论:丙泊酚、硫酸镁和木质素卡因在减轻手术过程中的血流动力学反应和确保满意的手术视野方面具有同等功效。然而,与异丙酚和木质碱相比,硫酸镁的恢复时间明显更长。此外,硫酸镁所需的神经肌肉阻断剂总剂量也明显低于木质碱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulfate, Lignocaine, and Propofol for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Objective: This study functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a surgical procedure requiring minimal bleeding to optimize the surgical field. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate, lignocaine, and propofol in attenuating hemodynamic response. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of these agents in reducing hemodynamic response. The secondary objectives included assessing the quality of the surgical field, recovery time, and total neuromuscular dose.

Methods: We randomly allocated 105 patients scheduled for FESS into three groups: lignocaine, propofol, and magnesium sulfate. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded every 5 min for the first 30 min, followed by measurements every 10 min at the end of the procedure. Moreover, recovery time, total neuromuscular blocking dose, and surgical field score were noted upon completion of the procedure. Statistical analysis was conducted using the number cruncher statistical systems version 9.0.8 software.

Results: All three groups showed comparable hemodynamic response and surgical field scores. The recovery time was notably longer in the magnesium sulfate group [10.94 min (2.45)] than in the lignocaine [4.37 min (1.03)] [95% confidence interval (CI) -7.32, -5.83; P=0.000] and propofol groups [4.60 min (0.60)] (95% CI 5.60, 7.095; P=0.000). Moreover, the total neuromuscular blocking agent used was significantly lower in the magnesium sulfate group [5.89 mg (0.47)] than in the lignocaine [6.26 mg (0.56)] (95% CI 0.66, 0.03; P=0.035).

Conclusion: Propofol, magnesium sulfate, and lignocaine exerted equal efficacy in attenuating hemodynamic responses during surgery and ensuring a satisfactory surgical field. However, magnesium sulfate led to significantly longer recovery times compared with propofol and lignocaine. In addition, magnesium sulfate required a significantly lower total dose of neuromuscular blocking agents than lignocaine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信