阿布特罗加压定量吸入器在婴幼儿模型中通过小尺寸喉罩气道的给药效率。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ariel Berlinski, Jessica Fonzie, L Denise Willis
{"title":"阿布特罗加压定量吸入器在婴幼儿模型中通过小尺寸喉罩气道的给药效率。","authors":"Ariel Berlinski, Jessica Fonzie, L Denise Willis","doi":"10.4187/respcare.12055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative bronchospasm in pediatric patients supported through laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) is commonly treated with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) albuterol. The aim of the study was to evaluate delivery of pMDI albuterol through LMAs under different conditions in a model of infant/child supported with a ventilator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared drug delivery efficiency of 4 actuations of albuterol pMDI (captured on a filter placed between the LMA and a test lung), drug deposition in the circuit (elbow) and in the LMA under different experimental conditions. Outcomes were expressed of percentage of nominal dose. We compared devices (valved holding chamber [VHC] and adapter), timing of administration (inspiration and expiration), tidal volumes (50 mL and 100 mL), mode of actuation (single and multiple), and LMA sizes (1, 1.5, and 2). Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the contribution of each to these components to the outcomes. <i>P</i> < .05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results are expressed as median (interquartile range) of pooled data. Drug delivery efficiency was 0% (0-1.1) and 6.3% (3.2-14.7) for adapter and VHC, respectively. Elbow deposition was 25.8% (19.2-63.3) and 2.9% (1.4-6.4) for adapter and VHC, respectively. LMA deposition was 2.6% (1.3-4.6) and 4.6% (2.9-6.1) for adapter and VHC, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that device, timing of actuation, and LMA size explained 33%, 17%, and 8% of the observed variation in delivery efficiency (R<sup>2</sup> 0.63), respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that device and timing of actuation explained 52% and 16% of the observed variation, respectively (R<sup>2</sup> 0.70). Multiple regression analysis poorly explained factors associated with LMA deposition (R<sup>2</sup> 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a VHC, actuating the pMDI during exhalation, and using a small LMA size increased drug delivery efficiency. The adapter was an inefficient add-on device for aerosol delivery with a pMDI through an LMA that caused significant circuit deposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delivery Efficiency of Albuterol Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler Through Small Size Laryngeal Mask Airways in an Infant and Child Model.\",\"authors\":\"Ariel Berlinski, Jessica Fonzie, L Denise Willis\",\"doi\":\"10.4187/respcare.12055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative bronchospasm in pediatric patients supported through laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) is commonly treated with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) albuterol. The aim of the study was to evaluate delivery of pMDI albuterol through LMAs under different conditions in a model of infant/child supported with a ventilator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared drug delivery efficiency of 4 actuations of albuterol pMDI (captured on a filter placed between the LMA and a test lung), drug deposition in the circuit (elbow) and in the LMA under different experimental conditions. Outcomes were expressed of percentage of nominal dose. We compared devices (valved holding chamber [VHC] and adapter), timing of administration (inspiration and expiration), tidal volumes (50 mL and 100 mL), mode of actuation (single and multiple), and LMA sizes (1, 1.5, and 2). Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the contribution of each to these components to the outcomes. <i>P</i> < .05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results are expressed as median (interquartile range) of pooled data. Drug delivery efficiency was 0% (0-1.1) and 6.3% (3.2-14.7) for adapter and VHC, respectively. Elbow deposition was 25.8% (19.2-63.3) and 2.9% (1.4-6.4) for adapter and VHC, respectively. LMA deposition was 2.6% (1.3-4.6) and 4.6% (2.9-6.1) for adapter and VHC, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that device, timing of actuation, and LMA size explained 33%, 17%, and 8% of the observed variation in delivery efficiency (R<sup>2</sup> 0.63), respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that device and timing of actuation explained 52% and 16% of the observed variation, respectively (R<sup>2</sup> 0.70). Multiple regression analysis poorly explained factors associated with LMA deposition (R<sup>2</sup> 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a VHC, actuating the pMDI during exhalation, and using a small LMA size increased drug delivery efficiency. The adapter was an inefficient add-on device for aerosol delivery with a pMDI through an LMA that caused significant circuit deposition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过喉罩通气道(LMA)支持的儿科患者术中支气管痉挛通常使用加压计量吸入器(pMDI)阿布特罗治疗。本研究的目的是在使用呼吸机支持的婴幼儿模型中评估不同条件下通过喉罩气道输送 pMDI 阿布特罗的情况:方法: 我们比较了在不同实验条件下 4 次启动阿布特罗 pMDI 的给药效率(在放置于 LMA 和测试肺之间的过滤器上捕获)、回路(肘部)中的药物沉积以及 LMA 中的药物沉积。结果以额定剂量的百分比表示。我们比较了装置(带阀容纳腔 [VHC] 和适配器)、给药时间(吸气和呼气)、潮气量(50 毫升和 100 毫升)、致动模式(单次和多次)以及 LMA 尺寸(1、1.5 和 2)。多元回归分析用于评估这些因素对结果的影响。结果:结果以汇总数据的中位数(四分位间距)表示。适配器和 VHC 的给药效率分别为 0% (0-1.1) 和 6.3% (3.2-14.7)。适配器和 VHC 的肘部沉积率分别为 25.8%(19.2-63.3)和 2.9%(1.4-6.4)。适配器和 VHC 的 LMA 沉积率分别为 2.6%(1.3-4.6)和 4.6%(2.9-6.1)。多元回归分析表明,装置、启动时机和 LMA 大小分别解释了 33%、17% 和 8% 的输送效率观测变化(R2 0.63)。多元回归分析表明,装置和启动时机分别解释了 52% 和 16% 的观察变异(R2 0.70)。多元回归分析对 LMA 沉积相关因素的解释能力较差(R2 0.22):结论:使用 VHC、在呼气时启动 pMDI 以及使用小尺寸 LMA 均可提高给药效率。适配器是通过 LMA 使用 pMDI 进行气溶胶给药的低效附加装置,会造成严重的回路沉积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delivery Efficiency of Albuterol Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler Through Small Size Laryngeal Mask Airways in an Infant and Child Model.

Background: Intraoperative bronchospasm in pediatric patients supported through laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) is commonly treated with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) albuterol. The aim of the study was to evaluate delivery of pMDI albuterol through LMAs under different conditions in a model of infant/child supported with a ventilator.

Methods: We compared drug delivery efficiency of 4 actuations of albuterol pMDI (captured on a filter placed between the LMA and a test lung), drug deposition in the circuit (elbow) and in the LMA under different experimental conditions. Outcomes were expressed of percentage of nominal dose. We compared devices (valved holding chamber [VHC] and adapter), timing of administration (inspiration and expiration), tidal volumes (50 mL and 100 mL), mode of actuation (single and multiple), and LMA sizes (1, 1.5, and 2). Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the contribution of each to these components to the outcomes. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Results are expressed as median (interquartile range) of pooled data. Drug delivery efficiency was 0% (0-1.1) and 6.3% (3.2-14.7) for adapter and VHC, respectively. Elbow deposition was 25.8% (19.2-63.3) and 2.9% (1.4-6.4) for adapter and VHC, respectively. LMA deposition was 2.6% (1.3-4.6) and 4.6% (2.9-6.1) for adapter and VHC, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that device, timing of actuation, and LMA size explained 33%, 17%, and 8% of the observed variation in delivery efficiency (R2 0.63), respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that device and timing of actuation explained 52% and 16% of the observed variation, respectively (R2 0.70). Multiple regression analysis poorly explained factors associated with LMA deposition (R2 0.22).

Conclusions: Using a VHC, actuating the pMDI during exhalation, and using a small LMA size increased drug delivery efficiency. The adapter was an inefficient add-on device for aerosol delivery with a pMDI through an LMA that caused significant circuit deposition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信