Guillermo Romero-Farina, Santiago Aguadé-Bruix, Ignacio Ferreira-González
{"title":"女性不同程度的总和差异灌注评分：对与心脏事件相关的预后变量的影响。","authors":"Guillermo Romero-Farina, Santiago Aguadé-Bruix, Ignacio Ferreira-González","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating the predictive models (PM) for a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) only in women with abnormal summed difference score (SDS ≥ 1), borderline myocardial ischemia (borderline-MIsch: SDS = 1), MIsch (SDS ≥ 2), mild-MIsch (SDS = 2-4), and moderate-severe MIsch (ms-MIsch: SDS ≥ 5).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2000 and January 2018, of 25 943 consecutive patients who underwent gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (gSPECT-MPI) for coronary risk stratification; 717 women (age 68.37 ± 3.4 years) with an abnormal SDS ≥ 1 were included. During the follow-up (mean 4 ± 2.9 years) post-gSPECT-MPI, MACE (unstable angina, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiac death) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the global women cohort with abnormal SDS (n = 717), the PM was angina [hazard ratio (HR): 1.65, P = 0.016], diabetes (HR: 1.72, P = 0.004), beta-blockers (HR: 1.61, P = 0.009), pharmacological stress (HR: 1.74, P = 0.007), ↓ segment (ST) mm ≥ 1 (HR: 1.54, P = 0.039), and moderate-to-severe abnormal summed stress score (ms-SSS) (HR: 2.92, P = 0.001). In borderline-MIsch group (n = 208), the PM was previous myocardial infarction (HR: 3.8, P = 0.001), nitrates (HR: 2.13, P = 0.047), pharmacological stress (HR: 4.81, P < 0.001), and ↓ST mm ≥ 1 (HR: 3.07, P = 0.014). In MIsch group (n = 509), the PM model was ms-SSS (HR: 2.25, P = 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.73, P = 0.011), angina (HR: 1.68, P = 0.029), beta-blockers (HR: 1.59, P = 0.026), and ms-MIsch (HR: 1.62, P = 0.044). In mild-MIsch group (n = 399), the PM was ms-SSS (HR: 2.55, P = 0.003), diabetes (HR: 2.17, P = 0.004), angina (HR: 1.89, P = 0.037), and beta-blockers (HR: 2.01, P = 0.011). In ms-MIsch group (n = 110), the predictive variable for MACE was ms-SSS (HR: 2.27, P = 0.016). The ms-SSS significantly increases the prognostic value of the ms-MIsch (P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with different degrees of abnormal SDS have different PMs of MACE. The ms-SSS stands out as the most significant predictive variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different degrees of summed difference perfusion score in women: influence on the prognostic variables associated with cardiac events.\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo Romero-Farina, Santiago Aguadé-Bruix, Ignacio Ferreira-González\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating the predictive models (PM) for a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) only in women with abnormal summed difference score (SDS ≥ 1), borderline myocardial ischemia (borderline-MIsch: SDS = 1), MIsch (SDS ≥ 2), mild-MIsch (SDS = 2-4), and moderate-severe MIsch (ms-MIsch: SDS ≥ 5).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2000 and January 2018, of 25 943 consecutive patients who underwent gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (gSPECT-MPI) for coronary risk stratification; 717 women (age 68.37 ± 3.4 years) with an abnormal SDS ≥ 1 were included. During the follow-up (mean 4 ± 2.9 years) post-gSPECT-MPI, MACE (unstable angina, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiac death) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the global women cohort with abnormal SDS (n = 717), the PM was angina [hazard ratio (HR): 1.65, P = 0.016], diabetes (HR: 1.72, P = 0.004), beta-blockers (HR: 1.61, P = 0.009), pharmacological stress (HR: 1.74, P = 0.007), ↓ segment (ST) mm ≥ 1 (HR: 1.54, P = 0.039), and moderate-to-severe abnormal summed stress score (ms-SSS) (HR: 2.92, P = 0.001). In borderline-MIsch group (n = 208), the PM was previous myocardial infarction (HR: 3.8, P = 0.001), nitrates (HR: 2.13, P = 0.047), pharmacological stress (HR: 4.81, P < 0.001), and ↓ST mm ≥ 1 (HR: 3.07, P = 0.014). In MIsch group (n = 509), the PM model was ms-SSS (HR: 2.25, P = 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.73, P = 0.011), angina (HR: 1.68, P = 0.029), beta-blockers (HR: 1.59, P = 0.026), and ms-MIsch (HR: 1.62, P = 0.044). In mild-MIsch group (n = 399), the PM was ms-SSS (HR: 2.55, P = 0.003), diabetes (HR: 2.17, P = 0.004), angina (HR: 1.89, P = 0.037), and beta-blockers (HR: 2.01, P = 0.011). In ms-MIsch group (n = 110), the predictive variable for MACE was ms-SSS (HR: 2.27, P = 0.016). The ms-SSS significantly increases the prognostic value of the ms-MIsch (P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with different degrees of abnormal SDS have different PMs of MACE. The ms-SSS stands out as the most significant predictive variable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001921\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Different degrees of summed difference perfusion score in women: influence on the prognostic variables associated with cardiac events.
Objective: Evaluating the predictive models (PM) for a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) only in women with abnormal summed difference score (SDS ≥ 1), borderline myocardial ischemia (borderline-MIsch: SDS = 1), MIsch (SDS ≥ 2), mild-MIsch (SDS = 2-4), and moderate-severe MIsch (ms-MIsch: SDS ≥ 5).
Methods: Between January 2000 and January 2018, of 25 943 consecutive patients who underwent gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (gSPECT-MPI) for coronary risk stratification; 717 women (age 68.37 ± 3.4 years) with an abnormal SDS ≥ 1 were included. During the follow-up (mean 4 ± 2.9 years) post-gSPECT-MPI, MACE (unstable angina, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiac death) was assessed.
Results: In the global women cohort with abnormal SDS (n = 717), the PM was angina [hazard ratio (HR): 1.65, P = 0.016], diabetes (HR: 1.72, P = 0.004), beta-blockers (HR: 1.61, P = 0.009), pharmacological stress (HR: 1.74, P = 0.007), ↓ segment (ST) mm ≥ 1 (HR: 1.54, P = 0.039), and moderate-to-severe abnormal summed stress score (ms-SSS) (HR: 2.92, P = 0.001). In borderline-MIsch group (n = 208), the PM was previous myocardial infarction (HR: 3.8, P = 0.001), nitrates (HR: 2.13, P = 0.047), pharmacological stress (HR: 4.81, P < 0.001), and ↓ST mm ≥ 1 (HR: 3.07, P = 0.014). In MIsch group (n = 509), the PM model was ms-SSS (HR: 2.25, P = 0.001), diabetes (HR: 1.73, P = 0.011), angina (HR: 1.68, P = 0.029), beta-blockers (HR: 1.59, P = 0.026), and ms-MIsch (HR: 1.62, P = 0.044). In mild-MIsch group (n = 399), the PM was ms-SSS (HR: 2.55, P = 0.003), diabetes (HR: 2.17, P = 0.004), angina (HR: 1.89, P = 0.037), and beta-blockers (HR: 2.01, P = 0.011). In ms-MIsch group (n = 110), the predictive variable for MACE was ms-SSS (HR: 2.27, P = 0.016). The ms-SSS significantly increases the prognostic value of the ms-MIsch (P = 0.001).
Conclusion: Women with different degrees of abnormal SDS have different PMs of MACE. The ms-SSS stands out as the most significant predictive variable.
期刊介绍：
Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
