开胸手术中以痛觉水平指数为导向的浅胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞与竖脊平面阻滞:倾向匹配非劣效性临床试验。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Cosmin Bălan, Cristian Boroş, Bianca Moroşanu, Antonia Coman, Iulia Stănculea, Liana Văleanu, Mihai Şefan, Bogdan Pavel, Ana-Maria Ioan, Adrian Wong, Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi
{"title":"开胸手术中以痛觉水平指数为导向的浅胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞与竖脊平面阻滞:倾向匹配非劣效性临床试验。","authors":"Cosmin Bălan, Cristian Boroş, Bianca Moroşanu, Antonia Coman, Iulia Stănculea, Liana Văleanu, Mihai Şefan, Bogdan Pavel, Ana-Maria Ioan, Adrian Wong, Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01236-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This single-center study explored the efficacy of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in opioid-sparing within Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed anesthesia for elective open-heart surgery. After targeted propensity matching, 19 adult patients given general anesthesia with preincisional SPIPB were compared to 33 with preincisional ESPB. We hypothesized that SPIPB is non-inferior to ESPB in reducing total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, with a non-inferiority margin (δ) set at 0.1 mg. Intraoperative fentanyl dosing targeted a NOL index ≤ 25. Postoperatively, paracetamol 1 g 6-hourly and morphine for numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 were administered. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, as the confidence interval for the median difference of 0.1 mg (95% CI 0.05-0.15) crossed the predefined δ, with the lower bound falling below and the upper bound exceeding δ, p = 0.558. SPIPB led to higher postoperative morphine use at 24 and 48 h: 0 (0-40.6) vs. 59.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.001 and 22.2 (0-42.6) vs. 63.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg<sup>-1</sup>, p = 0.001. Four times fewer SPIPB patients remained morphine-free at 48 h, p < 0.001, and their time to first morphine dose was three times shorter compared to ESPB patients, p = 0.001. SPIPB led to higher time-weighted average NRS scores at rest, 1 (0-1) vs. 1 (1-2), p = 0.004, and with movement, 2 (1-2) vs. 3 (2-3), p = 0.002, calculated over the 48-h period post-extubation. The SPIPB group had a significantly higher average NOL index, p = 0.003, and greater NOL index variability, p = 0.027. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, with SPIPB leading to higher postoperative morphine use, higher pain scores, and reduced nociception control.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nociception level index-directed superficial parasternal intercostal plane block vs erector spinae plane block in open-heart surgery: a propensity matched non-inferiority clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Cosmin Bălan, Cristian Boroş, Bianca Moroşanu, Antonia Coman, Iulia Stănculea, Liana Văleanu, Mihai Şefan, Bogdan Pavel, Ana-Maria Ioan, Adrian Wong, Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-024-01236-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This single-center study explored the efficacy of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in opioid-sparing within Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed anesthesia for elective open-heart surgery. After targeted propensity matching, 19 adult patients given general anesthesia with preincisional SPIPB were compared to 33 with preincisional ESPB. We hypothesized that SPIPB is non-inferior to ESPB in reducing total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, with a non-inferiority margin (δ) set at 0.1 mg. Intraoperative fentanyl dosing targeted a NOL index ≤ 25. Postoperatively, paracetamol 1 g 6-hourly and morphine for numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 were administered. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, as the confidence interval for the median difference of 0.1 mg (95% CI 0.05-0.15) crossed the predefined δ, with the lower bound falling below and the upper bound exceeding δ, p = 0.558. SPIPB led to higher postoperative morphine use at 24 and 48 h: 0 (0-40.6) vs. 59.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.001 and 22.2 (0-42.6) vs. 63.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg<sup>-1</sup>, p = 0.001. Four times fewer SPIPB patients remained morphine-free at 48 h, p < 0.001, and their time to first morphine dose was three times shorter compared to ESPB patients, p = 0.001. SPIPB led to higher time-weighted average NRS scores at rest, 1 (0-1) vs. 1 (1-2), p = 0.004, and with movement, 2 (1-2) vs. 3 (2-3), p = 0.002, calculated over the 48-h period post-extubation. The SPIPB group had a significantly higher average NOL index, p = 0.003, and greater NOL index variability, p = 0.027. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, with SPIPB leading to higher postoperative morphine use, higher pain scores, and reduced nociception control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01236-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01236-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项单中心研究探讨了浅胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞(SPIPB)与直立肌脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)在选择性开胸手术的麻醉中根据痛觉水平(NOL)指数进行阿片类药物保留的疗效。经过有针对性的倾向匹配后,19 名接受全身麻醉的成年患者在手术前接受了 SPIPB,33 名患者在手术前接受了 ESPB。我们假设 SPIPB 在减少术中芬太尼总用量方面不劣于 ESPB,非劣效边距 (δ) 设定为 0.1 毫克。术中芬太尼剂量的目标是 NOL 指数≤25。术后每 6 小时服用 1 克扑热息痛,吗啡剂量为数字评定量表(NRS)≥ 4。本研究无法证明 SPIPB 在术中芬太尼总用量方面劣于 ESPB,因为中位数差异 0.1 毫克(95% CI 0.05-0.15)的置信区间超过了预先设定的δ,下限低于δ,上限超过δ,P = 0.558。SPIPB 导致术后 24 小时和 48 小时吗啡用量增加:0 (0-40.6) vs. 59.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg-1, p -1, p = 0.001。在 48 小时内仍未使用吗啡的 SPIPB 患者人数比 SPIPB 患者少四倍,P = 0.001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nociception level index-directed superficial parasternal intercostal plane block vs erector spinae plane block in open-heart surgery: a propensity matched non-inferiority clinical trial.

This single-center study explored the efficacy of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in opioid-sparing within Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed anesthesia for elective open-heart surgery. After targeted propensity matching, 19 adult patients given general anesthesia with preincisional SPIPB were compared to 33 with preincisional ESPB. We hypothesized that SPIPB is non-inferior to ESPB in reducing total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, with a non-inferiority margin (δ) set at 0.1 mg. Intraoperative fentanyl dosing targeted a NOL index ≤ 25. Postoperatively, paracetamol 1 g 6-hourly and morphine for numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 were administered. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, as the confidence interval for the median difference of 0.1 mg (95% CI 0.05-0.15) crossed the predefined δ, with the lower bound falling below and the upper bound exceeding δ, p = 0.558. SPIPB led to higher postoperative morphine use at 24 and 48 h: 0 (0-40.6) vs. 59.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg-1, p < 0.001 and 22.2 (0-42.6) vs. 63.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg-1, p = 0.001. Four times fewer SPIPB patients remained morphine-free at 48 h, p < 0.001, and their time to first morphine dose was three times shorter compared to ESPB patients, p = 0.001. SPIPB led to higher time-weighted average NRS scores at rest, 1 (0-1) vs. 1 (1-2), p = 0.004, and with movement, 2 (1-2) vs. 3 (2-3), p = 0.002, calculated over the 48-h period post-extubation. The SPIPB group had a significantly higher average NOL index, p = 0.003, and greater NOL index variability, p = 0.027. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, with SPIPB leading to higher postoperative morphine use, higher pain scores, and reduced nociception control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信