综合药品管理对出院用药信息质量的影响--随机对照试验的次要终点。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Liv Mathiesen, Tram Bich Michelle Nguyen, Ingrid Dæhlen, Morten Mowé, Marianne Lea
{"title":"综合药品管理对出院用药信息质量的影响--随机对照试验的次要终点。","authors":"Liv Mathiesen, Tram Bich Michelle Nguyen, Ingrid Dæhlen, Morten Mowé, Marianne Lea","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality discharge information is important to promote patient safety when patients are transferred from hospital to primary care. Patients with multiple long-term conditions are especially vulnerable to insufficient transfer of medication information, as they use many medications and have complex interactions with the healthcare services. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of integrated medicines management provided to hospitalized multimorbid patients on the quality of the discharge medication information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multimorbid patients ≥18 years, using a minimum of four regular medications from a minimum of two therapeutic medication classes were recruited from the Internal Medicine ward, Oslo University Hospital, Norway, from August 2014 to March 2016 and randomly assigned, 1:1, to the intervention or control group. Intervention patients received integrated medicines management throughout the hospital stay. Control patients received standard care. This paper reports the results of a pre-specified secondary endpoint analysis of a randomized controlled trial; the difference between the intervention and control group in the quality of discharge medication information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis population comprised 384 patients. Integrated medicines management improved the discharge summary quality score of the medication information from 5.8 ± 1.5 to 8.6 ± 2.6 (mean difference 2.7, 95% CI 2.3-3.2, p < 0.001). In total 171 intervention patients (89%) received a patient discharge information letter, compared to 66 control patients (35%), p < 0.001. The quality score of the medication information in the patient discharge information letter was improved from 6.0 ± 1.8 in the control group to 10.0 ± 1.3 in the intervention group (mean difference 4.0, 95% CI 3.6-4.4, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrated medicines management delivered to multimorbid patients during a hospital stay improved the quality of the medication information in discharge summaries as well as patient discharge information letters and ensured that a discharge information letter in lay language was prepared for almost all patients who were involved in the management of their medications after discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of integrated medicines management on quality of discharge medication information - a secondary endpoint in a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Liv Mathiesen, Tram Bich Michelle Nguyen, Ingrid Dæhlen, Morten Mowé, Marianne Lea\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/intqhc/mzae100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality discharge information is important to promote patient safety when patients are transferred from hospital to primary care. Patients with multiple long-term conditions are especially vulnerable to insufficient transfer of medication information, as they use many medications and have complex interactions with the healthcare services. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of integrated medicines management provided to hospitalized multimorbid patients on the quality of the discharge medication information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multimorbid patients ≥18 years, using a minimum of four regular medications from a minimum of two therapeutic medication classes were recruited from the Internal Medicine ward, Oslo University Hospital, Norway, from August 2014 to March 2016 and randomly assigned, 1:1, to the intervention or control group. Intervention patients received integrated medicines management throughout the hospital stay. Control patients received standard care. This paper reports the results of a pre-specified secondary endpoint analysis of a randomized controlled trial; the difference between the intervention and control group in the quality of discharge medication information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis population comprised 384 patients. Integrated medicines management improved the discharge summary quality score of the medication information from 5.8 ± 1.5 to 8.6 ± 2.6 (mean difference 2.7, 95% CI 2.3-3.2, p < 0.001). In total 171 intervention patients (89%) received a patient discharge information letter, compared to 66 control patients (35%), p < 0.001. The quality score of the medication information in the patient discharge information letter was improved from 6.0 ± 1.8 in the control group to 10.0 ± 1.3 in the intervention group (mean difference 4.0, 95% CI 3.6-4.4, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrated medicines management delivered to multimorbid patients during a hospital stay improved the quality of the medication information in discharge summaries as well as patient discharge information letters and ensured that a discharge information letter in lay language was prepared for almost all patients who were involved in the management of their medications after discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Quality in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Quality in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当患者从医院转到基层医疗机构时,高质量的出院信息对于促进患者安全非常重要。患有多种长期疾病的患者尤其容易因用药信息传递不足而受到影响,因为他们使用多种药物,与医疗服务之间存在复杂的相互作用。本研究旨在探讨为住院的多病患者提供综合药物管理对出院用药信息质量的影响:2014年8月至2016年3月期间,挪威奥斯陆大学医院内科病房招募了年龄≥18岁、至少使用两种治疗药物类别中四种常规药物的多病症患者,并按1:1的比例随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组患者在整个住院期间接受综合药物管理。对照组患者接受标准护理。本文报告了一项随机对照试验的预设次要终点分析结果,即干预组与对照组在出院用药信息质量方面的差异:结果:分析对象包括 384 名患者。综合药物管理提高了出院用药信息的质量分数,从 5.8 ± 1.5 提高到 8.6 ± 2.6(平均差异 2.7,95% CI 2.3-3.2,p < 0.001)。共有 171 名干预患者(89%)收到了患者出院信息信,而对照组患者为 66 名(35%),P < 0.001。患者出院告知书中的用药信息质量得分从对照组的 6.0 ± 1.8 提高到干预组的 10.0 ± 1.3(平均差异 4.0,95% CI 3.6-4.4,p < 0.001):结论:在住院期间为多病患者提供综合药物管理服务提高了出院摘要和患者出院告知书中药物信息的质量,并确保为几乎所有出院后参与药物管理的患者准备了通俗易懂的出院告知书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of integrated medicines management on quality of discharge medication information - a secondary endpoint in a randomized controlled trial.

Background: High-quality discharge information is important to promote patient safety when patients are transferred from hospital to primary care. Patients with multiple long-term conditions are especially vulnerable to insufficient transfer of medication information, as they use many medications and have complex interactions with the healthcare services. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of integrated medicines management provided to hospitalized multimorbid patients on the quality of the discharge medication information.

Methods: Multimorbid patients ≥18 years, using a minimum of four regular medications from a minimum of two therapeutic medication classes were recruited from the Internal Medicine ward, Oslo University Hospital, Norway, from August 2014 to March 2016 and randomly assigned, 1:1, to the intervention or control group. Intervention patients received integrated medicines management throughout the hospital stay. Control patients received standard care. This paper reports the results of a pre-specified secondary endpoint analysis of a randomized controlled trial; the difference between the intervention and control group in the quality of discharge medication information.

Results: The analysis population comprised 384 patients. Integrated medicines management improved the discharge summary quality score of the medication information from 5.8 ± 1.5 to 8.6 ± 2.6 (mean difference 2.7, 95% CI 2.3-3.2, p < 0.001). In total 171 intervention patients (89%) received a patient discharge information letter, compared to 66 control patients (35%), p < 0.001. The quality score of the medication information in the patient discharge information letter was improved from 6.0 ± 1.8 in the control group to 10.0 ± 1.3 in the intervention group (mean difference 4.0, 95% CI 3.6-4.4, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Integrated medicines management delivered to multimorbid patients during a hospital stay improved the quality of the medication information in discharge summaries as well as patient discharge information letters and ensured that a discharge information letter in lay language was prepared for almost all patients who were involved in the management of their medications after discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信