Eileen J Carter, Katherine Zavez, Carol Schramm, Meagan M Zolla, Katelyn Baron, David B Banach
{"title":"改善围手术期患者青霉素过敏评估的多方面实施策略:一项前后可行性实施研究。","authors":"Eileen J Carter, Katherine Zavez, Carol Schramm, Meagan M Zolla, Katelyn Baron, David B Banach","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention encourages nurses to evaluate penicillin allergies as part of hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programs. We evaluated the feasibility of an implementation strategy to improve nurses' comprehensive documentation of penicillin allergies. We defined feasibility as the uptake and acceptability of documentation procedures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Six-month pre-post feasibility implementation study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient surgical areas of an academic medical center located in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The implementation strategy was guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Model for Behavior Change and included, building an interdisciplinary coalition to iteratively evaluate the implementation effort, educational meetings with surgical prescribers and perioperative nurses, the development and distribution of educational pocket cards, and structured communication messages in the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 426 patients with 487 penicillin allergy records (216 records pre-implementation period, 271 records post-implementation period) were analyzed. Penicillin allergy documentation contained the following information in the pre- versus post-implementation period: symptoms of the reaction (87% vs 87%), timing/years since reaction (8% vs 26%), onset of reaction in relation to taking penicillin (0% vs 21%), how symptoms resolved (0% vs 21%), and penicillin re-exposure (3% vs 21%). Focus groups revealed nurses perceived documentation procedures as highly acceptable. Major drivers of acceptability included the perceived effectiveness of a detailed allergy history and self-efficacy in conducting a detailed allergy history.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses perceived the comprehensive documentation of penicillin allergy history intervention as acceptable, and uptake improved following a theory-informed implementation strategy. We offer implementation strategy components to facilitate nurses' engagement in penicillin allergy evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multifaceted implementation strategy to improve the evaluation of penicillin allergies in perioperative patients: a pre-post feasibility implementation study.\",\"authors\":\"Eileen J Carter, Katherine Zavez, Carol Schramm, Meagan M Zolla, Katelyn Baron, David B Banach\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2024.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention encourages nurses to evaluate penicillin allergies as part of hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programs. We evaluated the feasibility of an implementation strategy to improve nurses' comprehensive documentation of penicillin allergies. We defined feasibility as the uptake and acceptability of documentation procedures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Six-month pre-post feasibility implementation study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient surgical areas of an academic medical center located in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The implementation strategy was guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Model for Behavior Change and included, building an interdisciplinary coalition to iteratively evaluate the implementation effort, educational meetings with surgical prescribers and perioperative nurses, the development and distribution of educational pocket cards, and structured communication messages in the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 426 patients with 487 penicillin allergy records (216 records pre-implementation period, 271 records post-implementation period) were analyzed. Penicillin allergy documentation contained the following information in the pre- versus post-implementation period: symptoms of the reaction (87% vs 87%), timing/years since reaction (8% vs 26%), onset of reaction in relation to taking penicillin (0% vs 21%), how symptoms resolved (0% vs 21%), and penicillin re-exposure (3% vs 21%). Focus groups revealed nurses perceived documentation procedures as highly acceptable. Major drivers of acceptability included the perceived effectiveness of a detailed allergy history and self-efficacy in conducting a detailed allergy history.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses perceived the comprehensive documentation of penicillin allergy history intervention as acceptable, and uptake improved following a theory-informed implementation strategy. We offer implementation strategy components to facilitate nurses' engagement in penicillin allergy evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:美国疾病控制和预防中心鼓励护士评估青霉素过敏症,并将其作为医院抗生素管理计划的一部分。我们评估了改善护士全面记录青霉素过敏的实施策略的可行性。我们将可行性定义为记录程序的接受度和可接受性:设计:为期六个月的实施前-实施后可行性研究:干预措施:干预措施:实施策略以行为改变的能力、机会和动机模型为指导,包括建立跨学科联盟以反复评估实施工作、与手术处方人员和围手术期护士召开教育会议、制作和分发教育口袋卡片以及在电子病历中添加结构化交流信息:共分析了 426 名患者的 487 份青霉素过敏记录(实施前 216 份,实施后 271 份)。实施前与实施后的青霉素过敏记录包含以下信息:反应症状(87% vs 87%)、反应发生的时间/年份(8% vs 26%)、反应发生与服用青霉素的关系(0% vs 21%)、症状如何缓解(0% vs 21%)以及青霉素再次暴露(3% vs 21%)。焦点小组显示,护士们认为记录程序的可接受性很高。可接受性的主要驱动因素包括详细过敏史的感知效果和进行详细过敏史记录的自我效能:结论:护士们认为全面记录青霉素过敏史的干预措施是可接受的,而且在采用理论指导的实施策略后,护士们的接受度有所提高。我们提供了实施策略的组成部分,以促进护士参与青霉素过敏评估。
Multifaceted implementation strategy to improve the evaluation of penicillin allergies in perioperative patients: a pre-post feasibility implementation study.
Objective: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention encourages nurses to evaluate penicillin allergies as part of hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programs. We evaluated the feasibility of an implementation strategy to improve nurses' comprehensive documentation of penicillin allergies. We defined feasibility as the uptake and acceptability of documentation procedures.
Setting: Outpatient surgical areas of an academic medical center located in the U.S.
Intervention: The implementation strategy was guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Model for Behavior Change and included, building an interdisciplinary coalition to iteratively evaluate the implementation effort, educational meetings with surgical prescribers and perioperative nurses, the development and distribution of educational pocket cards, and structured communication messages in the electronic medical record.
Results: A total of 426 patients with 487 penicillin allergy records (216 records pre-implementation period, 271 records post-implementation period) were analyzed. Penicillin allergy documentation contained the following information in the pre- versus post-implementation period: symptoms of the reaction (87% vs 87%), timing/years since reaction (8% vs 26%), onset of reaction in relation to taking penicillin (0% vs 21%), how symptoms resolved (0% vs 21%), and penicillin re-exposure (3% vs 21%). Focus groups revealed nurses perceived documentation procedures as highly acceptable. Major drivers of acceptability included the perceived effectiveness of a detailed allergy history and self-efficacy in conducting a detailed allergy history.
Conclusions: Nurses perceived the comprehensive documentation of penicillin allergy history intervention as acceptable, and uptake improved following a theory-informed implementation strategy. We offer implementation strategy components to facilitate nurses' engagement in penicillin allergy evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.