概念验证:用于诊断致痫性脑病的便携式超低场磁共振成像。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1111/epi.18171
Tobias Bauer, Simon Olbrich, Anne Groteklaes, Nils Christian Lehnen, Mousa Zidan, Annalena Lange, Justus Bisten, Lennart Walger, Jennifer Faber, Walter Bruchhausen, Philipp Vollmuth, Ulrich Herrlinger, Alexander Radbruch, Rainer Surges, Hemmen Sabir, Theodor Rüber
{"title":"概念验证:用于诊断致痫性脑病的便携式超低场磁共振成像。","authors":"Tobias Bauer, Simon Olbrich, Anne Groteklaes, Nils Christian Lehnen, Mousa Zidan, Annalena Lange, Justus Bisten, Lennart Walger, Jennifer Faber, Walter Bruchhausen, Philipp Vollmuth, Ulrich Herrlinger, Alexander Radbruch, Rainer Surges, Hemmen Sabir, Theodor Rüber","doi":"10.1111/epi.18171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard in the diagnosis of epilepsy. However, high costs and technical barriers have limited adoption in low- and middle-income countries. Even in high-income nations, many individuals with epilepsy face delays in undergoing MRI. Recent advancements in ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI technology, particularly the development of portable scanners, offer a promising solution to the limited accessibility of MRI. In this study, we present and evaluate the imaging capability of ULF MRI in detecting structural abnormalities typically associated with epilepsy and compare it to high-field MRI at 3 T.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection was conducted within 3 consecutive weeks at the University Hospital Bonn. Inclusion criteria were a minimum age of 18 years, diagnosed epilepsy, and clinical high-field MRI with abnormalities. We used a .064 T Swoop portable MR Imaging System. Both high-field MRI and ULF MRI scans were evaluated independently by two experienced neuroradiologists as part of their clinical routine, comparing pathology detection and diagnosis completeness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three individuals with epilepsy were recruited. One subject presented with a dual pathology. Across the entire cohort, in 17 of 24 (71%) pathologies, an anomaly colocalizing with the actual lesion was observed on ULF MRI. For 11 of 24 (46%) pathologies, the full diagnosis could be made based on ULF MRI. Tumors and posttraumatic lesions could be diagnosed best on ULF MRI, whereas cortical dysplasia and other focal pathologies were the least well diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This single-center series of individuals with epilepsy demonstrates the feasibility and utility of ULF MRI for the field of epileptology. Its integration into epilepsy care offers transformative potential, particularly in resource-limited settings. Further research is needed to position ULF MRI within imaging modalities in the diagnosis of epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proof of concept: Portable ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of epileptogenic brain pathologies.\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Bauer, Simon Olbrich, Anne Groteklaes, Nils Christian Lehnen, Mousa Zidan, Annalena Lange, Justus Bisten, Lennart Walger, Jennifer Faber, Walter Bruchhausen, Philipp Vollmuth, Ulrich Herrlinger, Alexander Radbruch, Rainer Surges, Hemmen Sabir, Theodor Rüber\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard in the diagnosis of epilepsy. However, high costs and technical barriers have limited adoption in low- and middle-income countries. Even in high-income nations, many individuals with epilepsy face delays in undergoing MRI. Recent advancements in ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI technology, particularly the development of portable scanners, offer a promising solution to the limited accessibility of MRI. In this study, we present and evaluate the imaging capability of ULF MRI in detecting structural abnormalities typically associated with epilepsy and compare it to high-field MRI at 3 T.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection was conducted within 3 consecutive weeks at the University Hospital Bonn. Inclusion criteria were a minimum age of 18 years, diagnosed epilepsy, and clinical high-field MRI with abnormalities. We used a .064 T Swoop portable MR Imaging System. Both high-field MRI and ULF MRI scans were evaluated independently by two experienced neuroradiologists as part of their clinical routine, comparing pathology detection and diagnosis completeness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three individuals with epilepsy were recruited. One subject presented with a dual pathology. Across the entire cohort, in 17 of 24 (71%) pathologies, an anomaly colocalizing with the actual lesion was observed on ULF MRI. For 11 of 24 (46%) pathologies, the full diagnosis could be made based on ULF MRI. Tumors and posttraumatic lesions could be diagnosed best on ULF MRI, whereas cortical dysplasia and other focal pathologies were the least well diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This single-center series of individuals with epilepsy demonstrates the feasibility and utility of ULF MRI for the field of epileptology. Its integration into epilepsy care offers transformative potential, particularly in resource-limited settings. Further research is needed to position ULF MRI within imaging modalities in the diagnosis of epilepsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18171\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18171","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高场磁共振成像(MRI)是癫痫诊断的标准。然而,高昂的费用和技术障碍限制了它在中低收入国家的应用。即使在高收入国家,许多癫痫患者也迟迟不能接受磁共振成像检查。超低场(ULF)核磁共振成像技术的最新进展,尤其是便携式扫描仪的开发,为核磁共振成像的有限可及性提供了一个前景广阔的解决方案。在本研究中,我们介绍并评估了超低场磁共振成像在检测典型癫痫相关结构异常方面的成像能力,并将其与 3 T 高场磁共振成像进行了比较:数据收集在波恩大学医院连续 3 周内进行。纳入标准为至少 18 岁、确诊为癫痫、临床高场磁共振成像出现异常。我们使用的是 064 T Swoop 便携式磁共振成像系统。高场磁共振成像和超低频磁共振成像扫描均由两名经验丰富的神经放射科医生进行独立评估,作为他们临床常规工作的一部分,比较病理学检测和诊断的完整性:共招募了 23 名癫痫患者。结果:共招募了 23 名癫痫患者,其中一名患者有双重病理特征。在所有病例中,24 例病理中有 17 例(71%)在超低频磁共振成像中观察到与实际病变共定位的异常。在 24 种病理中,有 11 种(46%)可根据超低频磁共振成像做出全面诊断。超低频磁共振成像对肿瘤和创伤后病变的诊断率最高,而皮质发育不良和其他局灶性病变的诊断率最低:该单中心癫痫患者系列研究证明了超低频磁共振成像在癫痫领域的可行性和实用性。将超低频磁共振成像整合到癫痫治疗中具有变革性的潜力,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。超低频磁共振成像在癫痫诊断成像模式中的定位还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proof of concept: Portable ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of epileptogenic brain pathologies.

Objective: High-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard in the diagnosis of epilepsy. However, high costs and technical barriers have limited adoption in low- and middle-income countries. Even in high-income nations, many individuals with epilepsy face delays in undergoing MRI. Recent advancements in ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI technology, particularly the development of portable scanners, offer a promising solution to the limited accessibility of MRI. In this study, we present and evaluate the imaging capability of ULF MRI in detecting structural abnormalities typically associated with epilepsy and compare it to high-field MRI at 3 T.

Methods: Data collection was conducted within 3 consecutive weeks at the University Hospital Bonn. Inclusion criteria were a minimum age of 18 years, diagnosed epilepsy, and clinical high-field MRI with abnormalities. We used a .064 T Swoop portable MR Imaging System. Both high-field MRI and ULF MRI scans were evaluated independently by two experienced neuroradiologists as part of their clinical routine, comparing pathology detection and diagnosis completeness.

Results: Twenty-three individuals with epilepsy were recruited. One subject presented with a dual pathology. Across the entire cohort, in 17 of 24 (71%) pathologies, an anomaly colocalizing with the actual lesion was observed on ULF MRI. For 11 of 24 (46%) pathologies, the full diagnosis could be made based on ULF MRI. Tumors and posttraumatic lesions could be diagnosed best on ULF MRI, whereas cortical dysplasia and other focal pathologies were the least well diagnosed.

Significance: This single-center series of individuals with epilepsy demonstrates the feasibility and utility of ULF MRI for the field of epileptology. Its integration into epilepsy care offers transformative potential, particularly in resource-limited settings. Further research is needed to position ULF MRI within imaging modalities in the diagnosis of epilepsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信