Larissa Araújo de Lucena, Marcos Aurélio Araújo Freitas, Camila Mota Guida, Larissa C Hespanhol, Ana Karenina C de Sousa, Júlio César V de Sousa, Ferdinand Gilbert S Maia
{"title":"沙库比妥-缬沙坦可降低导管消融术后心房颤动复发率和左心房容积：系统综述与元分析》。","authors":"Larissa Araújo de Lucena, Marcos Aurélio Araújo Freitas, Camila Mota Guida, Larissa C Hespanhol, Ana Karenina C de Sousa, Júlio César V de Sousa, Ferdinand Gilbert S Maia","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00691-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone catheter ablation, the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan (SV) versus ACE inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) in preventing AF recurrence remains unclear. The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine whether SV offers superior outcomes in this clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched cohorts (PMC), evaluating SV's efficacy in preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence and structural remodeling assessed via left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial volume index (LAVi), with statistical analyses performed using Review Manager 5.1.7 and heterogeneity assessed via I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis comprised 642 patients from three RCTs and one PMC (319 SV-treated). SV significantly reduced AF recurrence [risk ratios (RR) 0.54; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.41-0.70; p < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), a trend also observed when considering RCTs exclusively (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41-0.84; p = 0.004; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Moreover, SV demonstrated a notable reduction in LAVi [mean deviation (MD) -5.34 mL/m<sup>2</sup>; 95% CI -8.77 to -1.91; p = 0.002; I<sup>2</sup> = 57%] compared with ARB, alongside a significant improvement in LVEF (MD 1.83%; 95% CI 1.35-2.32; p < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgroup analyses among patients with hypertension and LVEF < 50% also indicated lower AF recurrence with SV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SV therapy exhibited superior efficacy in reducing AF recurrence compared with ACEi or ARB and demonstrated superior outcomes in attenuating atrial structural remodeling after catheter ablation. These findings underscore the potential of SV as a therapeutic option for patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation, highlighting its efficacy in mitigating AF recurrence and structural remodeling.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO identifier number CRD42024497958.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Araújo de Lucena, Marcos Aurélio Araújo Freitas, Camila Mota Guida, Larissa C Hespanhol, Ana Karenina C de Sousa, Júlio César V de Sousa, Ferdinand Gilbert S Maia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40256-024-00691-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone catheter ablation, the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan (SV) versus ACE inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) in preventing AF recurrence remains unclear. The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine whether SV offers superior outcomes in this clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched cohorts (PMC), evaluating SV's efficacy in preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence and structural remodeling assessed via left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial volume index (LAVi), with statistical analyses performed using Review Manager 5.1.7 and heterogeneity assessed via I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis comprised 642 patients from three RCTs and one PMC (319 SV-treated). SV significantly reduced AF recurrence [risk ratios (RR) 0.54; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.41-0.70; p < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), a trend also observed when considering RCTs exclusively (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41-0.84; p = 0.004; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Moreover, SV demonstrated a notable reduction in LAVi [mean deviation (MD) -5.34 mL/m<sup>2</sup>; 95% CI -8.77 to -1.91; p = 0.002; I<sup>2</sup> = 57%] compared with ARB, alongside a significant improvement in LVEF (MD 1.83%; 95% CI 1.35-2.32; p < 0.00001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgroup analyses among patients with hypertension and LVEF < 50% also indicated lower AF recurrence with SV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SV therapy exhibited superior efficacy in reducing AF recurrence compared with ACEi or ARB and demonstrated superior outcomes in attenuating atrial structural remodeling after catheter ablation. These findings underscore the potential of SV as a therapeutic option for patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation, highlighting its efficacy in mitigating AF recurrence and structural remodeling.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO identifier number CRD42024497958.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00691-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00691-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Introduction: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone catheter ablation, the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan (SV) versus ACE inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) in preventing AF recurrence remains unclear. The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine whether SV offers superior outcomes in this clinical setting.
Methods: This study systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched cohorts (PMC), evaluating SV's efficacy in preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Outcomes included AF recurrence and structural remodeling assessed via left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial volume index (LAVi), with statistical analyses performed using Review Manager 5.1.7 and heterogeneity assessed via I2 statistics.
Results: The analysis comprised 642 patients from three RCTs and one PMC (319 SV-treated). SV significantly reduced AF recurrence [risk ratios (RR) 0.54; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.41-0.70; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%), a trend also observed when considering RCTs exclusively (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41-0.84; p = 0.004; I2 = 0%). Moreover, SV demonstrated a notable reduction in LAVi [mean deviation (MD) -5.34 mL/m2; 95% CI -8.77 to -1.91; p = 0.002; I2 = 57%] compared with ARB, alongside a significant improvement in LVEF (MD 1.83%; 95% CI 1.35-2.32; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses among patients with hypertension and LVEF < 50% also indicated lower AF recurrence with SV.
Conclusion: SV therapy exhibited superior efficacy in reducing AF recurrence compared with ACEi or ARB and demonstrated superior outcomes in attenuating atrial structural remodeling after catheter ablation. These findings underscore the potential of SV as a therapeutic option for patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation, highlighting its efficacy in mitigating AF recurrence and structural remodeling.
Registration: PROSPERO identifier number CRD42024497958.
期刊介绍：
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
