法国、德国和英国 ABO 血型不相容红细胞输血的频率和原因。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Aline Mirrione-Savin, Hengameh Aghili Pour, Nicola Swarbrick, Susanne Müller, Caroline Bacquet, Lucile Malard, Michael F Murphy, Pascale Richard, Jennifer Davies, Megan Rowley, Debbi Poles, Imad Sandid, Markus B Funk, Shruthi Narayan, Pierre Tiberghien, Richard Schäfer
{"title":"法国、德国和英国 ABO 血型不相容红细胞输血的频率和原因。","authors":"Aline Mirrione-Savin, Hengameh Aghili Pour, Nicola Swarbrick, Susanne Müller, Caroline Bacquet, Lucile Malard, Michael F Murphy, Pascale Richard, Jennifer Davies, Megan Rowley, Debbi Poles, Imad Sandid, Markus B Funk, Shruthi Narayan, Pierre Tiberghien, Richard Schäfer","doi":"10.1111/bjh.19848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prevention of ABO-incompatible red cell transfusions (ABO-it) requires accurate donor and patient identification and correct application of processes for transfusion safety. In France and Germany, a bedside identity check and ABO compatibility test are performed. In the UK, an identity check, often structured as a bedside checklist, is performed with or without electronic patient identification (ePID). To compare the efficacy of ABO-it bedside preventive measures, frequencies and causes of ABO-it between 2013 and 2022 were investigated in all three countries. Despite differing bedside safety measures, similar average ABO-it frequencies were observed in France (0.19 [SD:0.09]/100 000 issued red cell units) and in the UK (0.28 [SD:0.17]/100 000), whereas a higher frequency (0.71 [SD:0.23]/100 000) was observed in Germany which has similar bedside safety measures to France. ABO-it resulted mostly from erroneous patient identification and transfusion of a red cell unit intended for another patient. In France and Germany, all ABO-it were associated with incorrectly performed identity check and ABO compatibility test. In the UK, most ABO-it were associated with incorrectly performed identity checks. Current measures to prevent ABO-it are not fully effective. Further development and implementation of effective patient identification systems, including electronic information systems, across the entire transfusion process, should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequencies and causes of ABO-incompatible red cell transfusions in France, Germany and the United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Aline Mirrione-Savin, Hengameh Aghili Pour, Nicola Swarbrick, Susanne Müller, Caroline Bacquet, Lucile Malard, Michael F Murphy, Pascale Richard, Jennifer Davies, Megan Rowley, Debbi Poles, Imad Sandid, Markus B Funk, Shruthi Narayan, Pierre Tiberghien, Richard Schäfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.19848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prevention of ABO-incompatible red cell transfusions (ABO-it) requires accurate donor and patient identification and correct application of processes for transfusion safety. In France and Germany, a bedside identity check and ABO compatibility test are performed. In the UK, an identity check, often structured as a bedside checklist, is performed with or without electronic patient identification (ePID). To compare the efficacy of ABO-it bedside preventive measures, frequencies and causes of ABO-it between 2013 and 2022 were investigated in all three countries. Despite differing bedside safety measures, similar average ABO-it frequencies were observed in France (0.19 [SD:0.09]/100 000 issued red cell units) and in the UK (0.28 [SD:0.17]/100 000), whereas a higher frequency (0.71 [SD:0.23]/100 000) was observed in Germany which has similar bedside safety measures to France. ABO-it resulted mostly from erroneous patient identification and transfusion of a red cell unit intended for another patient. In France and Germany, all ABO-it were associated with incorrectly performed identity check and ABO compatibility test. In the UK, most ABO-it were associated with incorrectly performed identity checks. Current measures to prevent ABO-it are not fully effective. Further development and implementation of effective patient identification systems, including electronic information systems, across the entire transfusion process, should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19848\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预防 ABO 红细胞不相容输血(ABO-it)需要准确识别捐献者和患者,并正确执行输血安全流程。在法国和德国,需要进行床旁身份检查和 ABO 相容性测试。在英国,身份检查通常以床旁核对表的形式进行,可使用或不使用患者电子身份识别(ePID)。为了比较ABO-it床旁预防措施的效果,我们对这三个国家2013年至2022年期间发生ABO-it的频率和原因进行了调查。尽管各国采取了不同的床旁安全措施,但在法国(0.19 [SD:0.09]/100,000 签发红细胞单位)和英国(0.28 [SD:0.17]/100,000 签发红细胞单位)观察到的 ABO-it 平均频率相似,而在德国观察到的频率更高(0.71 [SD:0.23]/100,000 签发红细胞单位),因为德国的床旁安全措施与法国相似。ABO-it主要是由于患者身份识别错误和输注了原本输给另一位患者的红细胞。在法国和德国,所有的ABO-it都与错误的身份检查和ABO相容性测试有关。在英国,大多数ABO-it与错误的身份检查有关。目前预防 ABO-it 的措施并不完全有效。应考虑在整个输血过程中进一步开发和实施有效的患者身份识别系统,包括电子信息系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequencies and causes of ABO-incompatible red cell transfusions in France, Germany and the United Kingdom.

Prevention of ABO-incompatible red cell transfusions (ABO-it) requires accurate donor and patient identification and correct application of processes for transfusion safety. In France and Germany, a bedside identity check and ABO compatibility test are performed. In the UK, an identity check, often structured as a bedside checklist, is performed with or without electronic patient identification (ePID). To compare the efficacy of ABO-it bedside preventive measures, frequencies and causes of ABO-it between 2013 and 2022 were investigated in all three countries. Despite differing bedside safety measures, similar average ABO-it frequencies were observed in France (0.19 [SD:0.09]/100 000 issued red cell units) and in the UK (0.28 [SD:0.17]/100 000), whereas a higher frequency (0.71 [SD:0.23]/100 000) was observed in Germany which has similar bedside safety measures to France. ABO-it resulted mostly from erroneous patient identification and transfusion of a red cell unit intended for another patient. In France and Germany, all ABO-it were associated with incorrectly performed identity check and ABO compatibility test. In the UK, most ABO-it were associated with incorrectly performed identity checks. Current measures to prevent ABO-it are not fully effective. Further development and implementation of effective patient identification systems, including electronic information systems, across the entire transfusion process, should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信