对 "在半合成 RNA-seq 数据模拟中忽略归一化的影响会产生人为的假阳性 "和 "在分析人类群体样本时,采用流行的差异表达方法进行反向归一化可大大降低假阳性 "的回应

IF 10.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Xinzhou Ge, Yumei Li, Wei Li, Jingyi Jessica Li
{"title":"对 \"在半合成 RNA-seq 数据模拟中忽略归一化的影响会产生人为的假阳性 \"和 \"在分析人类群体样本时,采用流行的差异表达方法进行反向归一化可大大降低假阳性 \"的回应","authors":"Xinzhou Ge, Yumei Li, Wei Li, Jingyi Jessica Li","doi":"10.1186/s13059-024-03232-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two correspondences raised concerns or comments about our analyses regarding exaggerated false positives found by differential expression (DE) methods. Here, we discuss the points they raise and explain why we agree or disagree with these points. We add new analysis to confirm that the Wilcoxon rank-sum test remains the most robust method compared to the other five DE methods (DESeq2, edgeR, limma-voom, dearseq, and NOISeq) in two-condition DE analyses after considering normalization and winsorization, the data preprocessing steps discussed in the two correspondences.","PeriodicalId":12611,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to \\\"Neglecting normalization impact in semi-synthetic RNA-seq data simulation generates artificial false positives\\\" and \\\"Winsorization greatly reduces false positives by popular differential expression methods when analyzing human population samples\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Xinzhou Ge, Yumei Li, Wei Li, Jingyi Jessica Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13059-024-03232-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two correspondences raised concerns or comments about our analyses regarding exaggerated false positives found by differential expression (DE) methods. Here, we discuss the points they raise and explain why we agree or disagree with these points. We add new analysis to confirm that the Wilcoxon rank-sum test remains the most robust method compared to the other five DE methods (DESeq2, edgeR, limma-voom, dearseq, and NOISeq) in two-condition DE analyses after considering normalization and winsorization, the data preprocessing steps discussed in the two correspondences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03232-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03232-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有两封来信对我们关于差异表达(DE)方法发现的夸大假阳性的分析提出了担忧或意见。在此,我们讨论了他们提出的观点,并解释了我们同意或不同意这些观点的原因。我们添加了新的分析,以确认在考虑了归一化和赢家化(即两封来信中讨论的数据预处理步骤)之后,在双条件 DE 分析中,与其他五种 DE 方法(DESeq2、edgeR、limma-voom、dearseq 和 NOISeq)相比,Wilcoxon 秩和检验仍然是最稳健的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to "Neglecting normalization impact in semi-synthetic RNA-seq data simulation generates artificial false positives" and "Winsorization greatly reduces false positives by popular differential expression methods when analyzing human population samples"
Two correspondences raised concerns or comments about our analyses regarding exaggerated false positives found by differential expression (DE) methods. Here, we discuss the points they raise and explain why we agree or disagree with these points. We add new analysis to confirm that the Wilcoxon rank-sum test remains the most robust method compared to the other five DE methods (DESeq2, edgeR, limma-voom, dearseq, and NOISeq) in two-condition DE analyses after considering normalization and winsorization, the data preprocessing steps discussed in the two correspondences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Biology
Genome Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
241
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Genome Biology stands as a premier platform for exceptional research across all domains of biology and biomedicine, explored through a genomic and post-genomic lens. With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022),* the journal secures its position as the 3rd-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category and the 2nd-ranked research journal in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category by Thomson Reuters. Notably, Genome Biology holds the distinction of being the highest-ranked open-access journal in this category. Our dedicated team of highly trained in-house Editors collaborates closely with our esteemed Editorial Board of international experts, ensuring the journal remains on the forefront of scientific advances and community standards. Regular engagement with researchers at conferences and institute visits underscores our commitment to staying abreast of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信