影响急诊科工作人员轮班满意度的因素:急诊科健康状况快速评估

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Brooke Senken MD, Julie Welch MD, Elisa Sarmiento MSPH, Elizabeth Weinstein MD, Emma Cushman, Heather Kelker MD
{"title":"影响急诊科工作人员轮班满意度的因素:急诊科健康状况快速评估","authors":"Brooke Senken MD,&nbsp;Julie Welch MD,&nbsp;Elisa Sarmiento MSPH,&nbsp;Elizabeth Weinstein MD,&nbsp;Emma Cushman,&nbsp;Heather Kelker MD","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>In emergency medicine (EM), the interplay of wellbeing and burnout impacts not only patient care, but the health, productivity, and job satisfaction of EM healthcare workers. The study objective was to use a rapid assessment tool to identify factors that impact EM worker satisfaction, or “wellness,” while on shift in the emergency department (ED) and the association with role and level of satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective descriptive study utilized a QR-code-based electronic survey instrument that included a 7-point Likert shift satisfaction score. A voluntary response sampling was obtained from EM workers at five EDs. Respondents self-reported role and work site. Association and logistic regression analysis were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 755 responses, 467 were dissatisfied (score ≤ 5) and 288 were satisfied (score ≥ 6) with their shifts. Physicians reported higher satisfaction on shift than nurses (OR 2.77, 95% CL 2.01–3.81, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Factors associated with dissatisfied responses included: admission or transfer process (OR 0.40, CL 0.21–0.77, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), boarding patients (OR 0.13, CL 0.06–0.27, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), tools to do my job (OR 0.65, CL 0.46–0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and patient flow (OR 0.72, CL 0.53–0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Factors linked to a satisfied response included: teaching/learning (OR 2.85, CL 1.86–4.37, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and team/coworker interaction (OR 8.92, CL 6.14–12.96, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Satisfaction on shift for EM physicians, nurses, and staff differ and are associated with multiple identifiable factors. Focused attention to work environment and operations could help mitigate on-shift dissatisfaction. Endeavors aimed at cultivating and enhancing a supportive teaching and learning environment with an emphasis on team member and coworker interaction could positively impact and improve wellness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13315","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing emergency medicine worker shift satisfaction: A rapid assessment of wellness in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Brooke Senken MD,&nbsp;Julie Welch MD,&nbsp;Elisa Sarmiento MSPH,&nbsp;Elizabeth Weinstein MD,&nbsp;Emma Cushman,&nbsp;Heather Kelker MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/emp2.13315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>In emergency medicine (EM), the interplay of wellbeing and burnout impacts not only patient care, but the health, productivity, and job satisfaction of EM healthcare workers. The study objective was to use a rapid assessment tool to identify factors that impact EM worker satisfaction, or “wellness,” while on shift in the emergency department (ED) and the association with role and level of satisfaction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This prospective descriptive study utilized a QR-code-based electronic survey instrument that included a 7-point Likert shift satisfaction score. A voluntary response sampling was obtained from EM workers at five EDs. Respondents self-reported role and work site. Association and logistic regression analysis were performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 755 responses, 467 were dissatisfied (score ≤ 5) and 288 were satisfied (score ≥ 6) with their shifts. Physicians reported higher satisfaction on shift than nurses (OR 2.77, 95% CL 2.01–3.81, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Factors associated with dissatisfied responses included: admission or transfer process (OR 0.40, CL 0.21–0.77, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), boarding patients (OR 0.13, CL 0.06–0.27, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), tools to do my job (OR 0.65, CL 0.46–0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and patient flow (OR 0.72, CL 0.53–0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Factors linked to a satisfied response included: teaching/learning (OR 2.85, CL 1.86–4.37, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and team/coworker interaction (OR 8.92, CL 6.14–12.96, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Satisfaction on shift for EM physicians, nurses, and staff differ and are associated with multiple identifiable factors. Focused attention to work environment and operations could help mitigate on-shift dissatisfaction. Endeavors aimed at cultivating and enhancing a supportive teaching and learning environment with an emphasis on team member and coworker interaction could positively impact and improve wellness.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13315\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的 在急诊医学(EM)中,健康和职业倦怠的相互作用不仅会影响患者护理,还会影响急诊科医护人员的健康、工作效率和工作满意度。研究目的是使用快速评估工具来确定影响急诊科(ED)工作人员满意度或 "健康 "的因素,以及这些因素与角色和满意度之间的关系。 方法 这项前瞻性描述性研究采用了基于 QR 码的电子调查工具,其中包括 7 点 Likert 值班满意度评分。从五家急诊室的急诊室工作人员中进行了自愿抽样调查。受访者自我报告了角色和工作地点。进行了关联分析和逻辑回归分析。 结果 在 755 份回复中,467 人对轮班不满意(得分≤ 5),288 人满意(得分≥ 6)。医生对轮班的满意度高于护士(OR 2.77,95% CL 2.01-3.81,p <0.01)。与不满意度相关的因素包括:入院或转院流程(OR 0.40,CL 0.21-0.77,p <0.01)、病人登机(OR 0.13,CL 0.06-0.27,p <0.01)、工作工具(OR 0.65,CL 0.46-0.90,p = 0.01)和病人流程(OR 0.72,CL 0.53-0.98,p = 0.04)。与满意度相关的因素包括:教学(OR 2.85,CL 1.86-4.37,p = 0.01)和团队/同事互动(OR 8.92,CL 6.14-12.96,p = 0.01)。 结论 急诊科医生、护士和工作人员的轮班满意度各不相同,并与多种可识别因素相关。关注工作环境和操作有助于减轻轮班时的不满意度。努力培养和加强支持性的教学环境,强调团队成员和同事之间的互动,可对改善健康状况产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors influencing emergency medicine worker shift satisfaction: A rapid assessment of wellness in the emergency department

Objectives

In emergency medicine (EM), the interplay of wellbeing and burnout impacts not only patient care, but the health, productivity, and job satisfaction of EM healthcare workers. The study objective was to use a rapid assessment tool to identify factors that impact EM worker satisfaction, or “wellness,” while on shift in the emergency department (ED) and the association with role and level of satisfaction.

Methods

This prospective descriptive study utilized a QR-code-based electronic survey instrument that included a 7-point Likert shift satisfaction score. A voluntary response sampling was obtained from EM workers at five EDs. Respondents self-reported role and work site. Association and logistic regression analysis were performed.

Results

Of 755 responses, 467 were dissatisfied (score ≤ 5) and 288 were satisfied (score ≥ 6) with their shifts. Physicians reported higher satisfaction on shift than nurses (OR 2.77, 95% CL 2.01–3.81, p < 0.01). Factors associated with dissatisfied responses included: admission or transfer process (OR 0.40, CL 0.21–0.77, p < 0.01), boarding patients (OR 0.13, CL 0.06–0.27, p < 0.01), tools to do my job (OR 0.65, CL 0.46–0.90, p = 0.01), and patient flow (OR 0.72, CL 0.53–0.98, p = 0.04). Factors linked to a satisfied response included: teaching/learning (OR 2.85, CL 1.86–4.37, p < 0.01) and team/coworker interaction (OR 8.92, CL 6.14–12.96, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Satisfaction on shift for EM physicians, nurses, and staff differ and are associated with multiple identifiable factors. Focused attention to work environment and operations could help mitigate on-shift dissatisfaction. Endeavors aimed at cultivating and enhancing a supportive teaching and learning environment with an emphasis on team member and coworker interaction could positively impact and improve wellness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信